What ability?

On Oct 3, 1:36 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So why do you attack her on "Personal" Issues, that have nothing to do
> with her ability to be VP?
>
> On Oct 3, 5:01 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Maybe I can clarify a few things. I do not hate Sarah Palin. However,
> > I do not think she is the best choice for VP of this nation. Those are
> > two completely separate things.
> > Secondly, the fact that I do not think she would make a good VP has
> > nothing to do with "me" because I don't fit any of those criteria:
> > a) I'm not too liberal to function... I'm middle of the road
> > b) I'm not fat
> > c) I'm not ugly
> > Sorry to disprove your assertion, but I don't hate Palin, and the fact
> > that she won't make a good VP has nothing to do with me and everything
> > to do with her.
>
> > On Oct 3, 7:27 am, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > My personal polling indicates the women who hate Palin are either:
>
> > > a)  Too liberal to function
> > > b)  Fat
> > > c)  Ugly
> > > d)  All of the above
>
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Travis
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 7:20 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin
>
> > > I am glad I have no knowledge of my ex's whereabouts. and haven't for 30 
> > > years.   Excellent article.  thanks.
>
> > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >   Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin
> > >   By Belinda Luscombe
>
> > >   Some polls are suggesting that after gaining an initial bump, McCain's 
> > > campaign is being hobbled by Sarah Palin's vice-presidential candidacy. 
> > > The voters who are deserting her fastest, some of whom are even calling 
> > > on her to withdraw, are mostly women.
>
> > >   Ah, women, the consistently, tragically underestimated constituency. 
> > > What the Democrats learned during the primaries and the Republicans might 
> > > now be finding out the hard way, I learned at my very academic, 
> > > well-regarded all-girls high school: that is never to discount the 
> > > ability of women to open a robust, committed, well-thought-out vat of 
> > > hatred for another girl.
>
> > >   Women are weapons-grade haters. Hillary Clinton knows it. Palin knows 
> > > it too. When women get their hate on, they don't just dislike, or find 
> > > disfavor with, or sort of not really appreciate. They loathe — deeply, 
> > > richly, sustainingly. I do not say this to disparage my gender; women 
> > > also love in more or less the same way.
>
> > >   When men disagree, the steps to resolution are reasonably clear and 
> > > unsophisticated. Acts of physical violence are visited upon one another's 
> > > person or property, and the whole thing blows over. Women? Nu-unh. We 
> > > savor the discord. We draw it out. We share our contempt with our 
> > > friends, like a useful stock tip, or really good salsa. And then we all 
> > > go hate together: a mutually encouraging group activity for when the book 
> > > group gets quiet.
>
> > >   The hatred women have for Sarah Palin, and others had for Hillary 
> > > before her, is not necessarily about politics. Anybody can run the 
> > > numbers on how many people Palin's pro-life, pro-gun, socially 
> > > conservative policies will seduce and how many they will alienate. 
> > > Rather, the test that the McCain campaign failed to put her through was 
> > > the Abbotsleigh Ladies College test. (Named after my high school. Go, 
> > > green and gold!). It's a simple three-point pass-fail exam: Will the 
> > > other girls like her?
>
> > >   Here's why Palin doesn't make the grade:
>
> > >   1. She's too pretty. This is very bad news. At school, pretty girls 
> > > tend to be liked only by other pretty girls. The rest of us, whose looks 
> > > hover somewhere around underwhelming, resent them and whisper archly of 
> > > their "unearned attention." So, if everyone calls your candidate "hot," 
> > > you're in a whole mess of trouble. If the Pakistani head-of-state more or 
> > > less hits on her, well, yes, she'll get a sympathy vote, but we're in 
> > > Dukakis-in-the-tank territory. It's an admiration vaporizer. (Of course a 
> > > candidate can't be too ugly, or it will scare the men, who are clearly 
> > > shallow as a gender.)
>
> > >   2. She's too confident. This also bodes ill. Women have self-esteem 
> > > issues. But they also have other-women's-esteem issues. As almost any 
> > > woman — from the head of the Budgerigar Breeders association to Queen 
> > > Elizabeth — can attest, it's almost impossible to get confidence right. 
> > > Too timid and you're a pushover. Too self-aggrandizing and you're a bad 
> > > word unless it's about a dog, or Project Runway's Kenley. Or Michelle, my 
> > > best friend until 9th grade, after she won that debating prize and got 
> > > cocky.
>
> > >   3. She could embarrass us. History is not on Palin's side. Every time a 
> > > woman gets a plum job, be she Hewlett-Packard's ex-boss, Carly Fiorina, 
> > > or CBS's Katie Couric, there's always that whispery fear that people will 
> > > think she got the job just because she's a woman. So if things don't go 
> > > well — and a couple of YouTube clips have suggested that they're 
> > > certainly not going well for Palin — women are the first to turn on her 
> > > for making it harder for the rest of us to louse up at work.
>
> > >   The fact of the matter is once a female decides it's over with another 
> > > female, it's like an end-stage marriage. No matter how seemingly benign, 
> > > every attribute becomes an affront: the hair, the voice, the husband, the 
> > > moose-shooting, the glasses, the big family, the making rape victims pay 
> > > for their own rape test kits.
>
> > >   I know, I know. With all this extra baggage a female candidate has to 
> > > bear, the chances of finding a woman whom other women won't hate seem 
> > > skinnier than last year's jeans. But don't despair, if all else fails, we 
> > > could just do what we always do and just vote in some guy. It's worked so 
> > > well for us in the past.
>
> > >     a.. Find this article at:
> > >     
> > > b..http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1846832,00.html-Hidequoted
> > >  text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to