Since January, christian rebels have stepped up their raids, burning farms and schools and killing at least 400 people in the districts of Kitgum and Gulu, local authorities said. They have also abducted hundreds of young men and women, marching them to training camps in the Sudan, where their leader, Joseph Kony, holds court.
The rebel group began in 1986 as the Holy Spirit Movement, a Christian fundamentalist revolt under the leadership of a cult leader, Alice Lakwena, who claimed to give her followers immunity from bullets by anointing them with holy water. The holy water didn't work, and the movement was crushed by the army. Miss Lakwena fled to Kenya, where she was imprisoned in 1987. But with Sudanese help, Mr. Kony revived the revolt and has been plaguing Mr. Museveni since 1990. Mr. Kony is a former faith healer who wears white robes and claims to talk directly to God. His followers embrace an eclectic group of beliefs, including prohibitions against riding bicycles, killing pigs and eating white-feathered chickens. Punishment is severe: the rebels have chopped off the feet of young men caught riding bicycles. ---- - Yaakov Teitel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaakov_Teitel> an American-born Israeli, was arrested in the aftermath of the 2009 Tel Aviv gay center shooting <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Tel_Aviv_gay_center_shooting> for putting up posters that praised the attack. Although Teitel confessed to the gay center shooting, Israeli police have determined that he had no part in the attack.[24] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-24> In 2009 Teitel was arrested and indicted for several acts of domestic terror, namely a pipe bomb attack against leftist intellectual Zeev Sternhell <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeev_Sternhell>, the murders of a Palestinian taxi driver and a West Bank shepherd in 1997, and sending a booby-trapped package to the home of a Messianic Jewish <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messianic_Jewish> family in Ariel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_%28city%29>.[25] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-25>[26 ] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-26>[ 27] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-27> A search of his home revealed a cache of guns and parts used in explosive devices.[28] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-28> As of January 2011, the case was still pending trial.[29] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-29> On January 16, 2013 Teitel was convicted of two murders, two attempted murders, and several other charges.[30] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-30>[31 ] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism#cite_note-31> On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:08:50 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Examples please. > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:24 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> blame Christians and Jews and label them as terrorists >> --- >> because zionists and xians also commit terrorism worldwide. >> >> On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:06:47 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>> Typical from the likes of Joy Behar, Whoopie Goldberg, Rosie O'Donnell, >>> and other women who don't have a clue: "Let's blame Christians and Jews >>> and label them as terrorists"; but the truth is, there is no comparison, >>> there is no truth in this lie, and you and your far left extremist brethren >>> look foolish in making such comparisons. But enjoy! You'd fit right in >>> on "The View". >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:33 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> you are convinced that these folks, *e.g*.; the Islamic Levant, pose >>>> no threat to Americans. >>>> --- >>>> wrong again ... they are just as much of a threat as zionist or xian >>>> terrorists. >>>> yes ... the religious are a violent lot to avoid. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 6:52:11 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have no intent of leaving to go to the Middle East. It would seem >>>>> to me that you would feel much more comfortable there, since you are >>>>> convinced that these folks, *e.g*.; the Islamic Levant, pose no >>>>> threat to Americans. >>>>> >>>>> ull Definition of WARMONGER >>>>> *:* one who urges or attempts to stir up war >>>>> — *war·mon·ger·ing* *noun* >>>>> See warmonger defined for English-language learners » >>>>> <http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/warmonger> >>>>> See warmonger defined for kids » >>>>> <http://www.wordcentral.com/cgi-bin/student?book=Student&va=warmonger> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Clearly the term "War Monger" does not describe me in the least. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:56 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No doubt, Madge is from your side of the aisle..... >>>>>> --- >>>>>> wrong again, warmonger. >>>>>> Bibi and those in our government that he extorts are from your side >>>>>> of the isle. >>>>>> when are you leaving for the middle east to go fight in your silly >>>>>> religious war? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:49:04 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, Madge is most definitely from the Dept. of State, joining you >>>>>>> and your Peeps in singing "We Are The World, We Are The >>>>>>> Children".....No >>>>>>> doubt, Madge is from your side of the aisle..... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:34 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your >>>>>>>> side of the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> I describe her as a zionist warmonger and you think I'm on her side? >>>>>>>> get a clue ... I don't support zionists or warmongering neocons. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:13:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your >>>>>>>>> side of the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice; so you need to >>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>>>> boning up on who is and is not aligned with you. You've >>>>>>>>> successfully (and >>>>>>>>> correctly) quoted your favorite web sites today....You just need to >>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>> down who is and is not aligned with you, and SueBaby is on your side! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> as a mentee of Madeline Albright, Rice is a zionist to ignore ... >>>>>>>>>> and you have no clue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:15:31 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Geesh......You have no clue. You really don't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, plainolamerican < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Rice >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://allenbwest.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> October 13, 2014 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: rice] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever >>>>>>>>>>>>> learn it’s a bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk >>>>>>>>>>>>> show? The >>>>>>>>>>>>> former U.S. Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for >>>>>>>>>>>>> her five >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunday talk show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi >>>>>>>>>>>>> attack was a >>>>>>>>>>>>> “spontaneous reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on >>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>> former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to >>>>>>>>>>>>> appear. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The >>>>>>>>>>>>> Press and continued to staunchly defend her original statement >>>>>>>>>>>>> about the >>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Islam video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That >>>>>>>>>>>>> information >>>>>>>>>>>>> turned out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But >>>>>>>>>>>>> the notion >>>>>>>>>>>>> that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the >>>>>>>>>>>>> American >>>>>>>>>>>>> people is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply >>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrated.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Riiiight. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking >>>>>>>>>>>>> on a Sunday talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>>>>>> had no clue. After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his >>>>>>>>>>>>> intel >>>>>>>>>>>>> briefings. And I guess Obama is “too tired” from all those >>>>>>>>>>>>> fundraisers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Inform >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — >>>>>>>>>>>>> further advanced the idea that she is either blatantly >>>>>>>>>>>>> incompetent or just >>>>>>>>>>>>> REALLY blatantly incompetent. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As reported by the Washington Free Beacon >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the >>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>>>>>> to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant >>>>>>>>>>>>> (ISIS or >>>>>>>>>>>>> ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obama >>>>>>>>>>>>> administration is still not considering boots on the ground. >>>>>>>>>>>>> “This is very >>>>>>>>>>>>> early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do >>>>>>>>>>>>> what we >>>>>>>>>>>>> can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurds, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Meet the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Press.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the >>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing >>>>>>>>>>>>> expecting >>>>>>>>>>>>> different results.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that >>>>>>>>>>>>> when the enemy is still capable of conducting offensive >>>>>>>>>>>>> operations — which >>>>>>>>>>>>> the entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly >>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it >>>>>>>>>>>>> was just >>>>>>>>>>>>> two weeks ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anbar >>>>>>>>>>>>> province north of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss >>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn’t given the Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> support, where are the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>> “moderate opposition?” You mean the fellas who say they’ll >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue to >>>>>>>>>>>>> fight Bashar al-Assad regardless of what resources we provide? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps Ms. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice needs to sit in front of a map and understand that ISIS is >>>>>>>>>>>>> at Abu >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gharaib — you know that place where the progressive socialists >>>>>>>>>>>>> kept telling >>>>>>>>>>>>> us about when Bush was president. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been no recommendation from the American military commanders, >>>>>>>>>>>>> either on >>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground or here in Washington, that the United States put any >>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>> combat forces into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>> at the >>>>>>>>>>>>> White House and I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The >>>>>>>>>>>>> president >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been very plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or >>>>>>>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>>>>>>> would benefit from, American ground troops in combat again.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting >>>>>>>>>>>>> such an option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> question is >>>>>>>>>>>>> why would these commanders bring up the option — which they did >>>>>>>>>>>>> back in >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011 for a residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent >>>>>>>>>>>>> ideologue >>>>>>>>>>>>> in Barack Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> telling >>>>>>>>>>>>> the commanders what is and is not required in this “very >>>>>>>>>>>>> significant >>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be >>>>>>>>>>>>> conducted >>>>>>>>>>>>> over a long period of time.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground >>>>>>>>>>>>> options ready to be presented — but we have a rookie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Commander-in-Chief >>>>>>>>>>>>> telling them to “talk to the hand.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same >>>>>>>>>>>>> sheet of music as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on >>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunday Show addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dempsey >>>>>>>>>>>>> pointed to Mosul as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be >>>>>>>>>>>>> recommended. ABC’s Martha Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be >>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> effective against ISIS if we had U.S. troops on the ground >>>>>>>>>>>>> spotting >>>>>>>>>>>>> targets?” “Yeah. There will be circumstances when the answer to >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> question will likely be yes, but I haven’t encountered one right >>>>>>>>>>>>> now,” >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dempsey said.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be >>>>>>>>>>>>> totally effective in Kobani. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground >>>>>>>>>>>>> campaign at some point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security >>>>>>>>>>>>> Forces] are >>>>>>>>>>>>> ready to go back on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My >>>>>>>>>>>>> instinct at this >>>>>>>>>>>>> point is that that will require a different kind of advising and >>>>>>>>>>>>> assisting >>>>>>>>>>>>> because of the complexity of that fight.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses >>>>>>>>>>>>> from the senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in >>>>>>>>>>>>> combination with SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and SecState >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kerry spells serious trouble for our Republic and its national >>>>>>>>>>>>> security. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts >>>>>>>>>>>>> have various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>> one hand, >>>>>>>>>>>>> we’re trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Iraqi >>>>>>>>>>>>> army, the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> capacity and we have seen some success in that regard. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Syrian side, >>>>>>>>>>>>> we also have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate >>>>>>>>>>>>> opposition, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to >>>>>>>>>>>>> fight >>>>>>>>>>>>> Assad and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice >>>>>>>>>>>>> continued. >>>>>>>>>>>>> “Our air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by >>>>>>>>>>>>> merely >>>>>>>>>>>>> what happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi >>>>>>>>>>>>> Army got >>>>>>>>>>>>> routed just two weeks ago? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out >>>>>>>>>>>>> and blamed ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more >>>>>>>>>>>>> credibility sticking to that lie than trying to make up new ones. >>>>>>>>>>>>> ISIS must >>>>>>>>>>>>> be laughing and thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in >>>>>>>>>>>>> arising at such >>>>>>>>>>>>> a time of American weakness and incompetence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - New Members >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group >>>>>>>>>>>> /PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group >>>>>>>>>> /PoliticalForum >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group >>>>>>>> /PoliticalForum >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
