as a mentee of Madeline Albright, Rice is a zionist to ignore ... and you have no clue.
On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:15:31 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Geesh......You have no clue. You really don't. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Susan Rice >> --- >> a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. >> >> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <http://allenbwest.com/> >>> incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? >>> >>> Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on October >>> 13, 2014 >>> >>> [image: rice] >>> >>> So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever learn it’s >>> a bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk show? The former U.S. >>> Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for her five Sunday talk >>> show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi attack was a “spontaneous >>> reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on because former >>> Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to appear. >>> >>> Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The Press and >>> continued to staunchly defend her original statement about the anti-Islam >>> video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That information turned >>> out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the notion that >>> somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people >>> is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.” >>> >>> Riiiight. >>> >>> So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking on a >>> Sunday talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he probably had no >>> clue. After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his intel briefings. And >>> I guess Obama is “too tired” from all those fundraisers. >>> >>> Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... >>> >>> Inform >>> >>> Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — further >>> advanced the idea that she is either blatantly incompetent or just REALLY >>> blatantly incompetent. >>> >>> As reported by the Washington Free Beacon >>> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, >>> >>> “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the strategy >>> to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS or >>> ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the Obama >>> administration is still not considering boots on the ground. “This is very >>> early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do what we >>> can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the Kurds, and >>> ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able to >>> control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the >>> Press.” >>> >>> I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the >>> definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing expecting >>> different results.” >>> >>> Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that when the >>> enemy is still capable of conducting offensive operations — which the >>> entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly not destroying >>> them. >>> >>> Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States has been >>> missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it was just two weeks >>> ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al Anbar province north >>> of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. >>> >>> And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss hasn’t given >>> the Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes is not support, where >>> are the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, what “moderate >>> opposition?” You mean the fellas who say they’ll continue to fight Bashar >>> al-Assad regardless of what resources we provide? Perhaps Ms. Rice needs to >>> sit in front of a map and understand that ISIS is at Abu Gharaib — you know >>> that place where the progressive socialists kept telling us about when Bush >>> was president. >>> >>> Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There has been >>> no recommendation from the American military commanders, either on the >>> ground or here in Washington, that the United States put any ground combat >>> forces into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone at the White >>> House and I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The president has >>> been very plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or even would >>> benefit from, American ground troops in combat again.” >>> >>> I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting such an >>> option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The question is why would >>> these commanders bring up the option — which they did back in 2011 for a >>> residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent ideologue in Barack >>> Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is telling the >>> commanders what is and is not required in this “very significant >>> counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be conducted >>> over a long period of time.” >>> >>> I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground options ready >>> to be presented — but we have a rookie Commander-in-Chief telling them to >>> “talk to the hand.” >>> >>> As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” >>> >>> And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same sheet of music >>> as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on another Sunday Show >>> addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. Dempsey pointed to Mosul >>> as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be recommended. ABC’s Martha >>> Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be more effective against ISIS if we had >>> U.S. troops on the ground spotting targets?” “Yeah. There will be >>> circumstances when the answer to that question will likely be yes, but I >>> haven’t encountered one right now,” Dempsey said.” >>> >>> C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be totally >>> effective in Kobani. >>> >>> “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground campaign at some >>> point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security Forces] are ready to go back >>> on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My instinct at this point is that >>> that will require a different kind of advising and assisting because of the >>> complexity of that fight.” >>> >>> I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses from the >>> senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in combination with >>> SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, and SecState Kerry spells >>> serious trouble for our Republic and its national security. >>> >>> This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts have >>> various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the one hand, we’re >>> trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means the Iraqi army, >>> the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up that capacity >>> and we have seen some success in that regard. On the Syrian side, we also >>> have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate opposition, and >>> giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to fight Assad >>> and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice continued. “Our >>> air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by merely what >>> happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” >>> >>> There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity for the >>> Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi Army got routed >>> just two weeks ago? >>> >>> I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out and blamed >>> ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more credibility sticking >>> to that lie than trying to make up new ones. ISIS must be laughing and >>> thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in arising at such a time of >>> American weakness and incompetence. >>> >>> *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __._,_.___ >>> ------------------------------ >>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Visit Your Group >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> >>> >>> >>> - New Members >>> >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> >>> >>> 1 >>> >>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> >>> >>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>> >>> __,_._,___ >>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
