No, Madge is most definitely from the Dept. of State, joining you and your Peeps in singing "We Are The World, We Are The Children".....No doubt, Madge is from your side of the aisle.....
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:34 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your side of > the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice > --- > I describe her as a zionist warmonger and you think I'm on her side? > get a clue ... I don't support zionists or warmongering neocons. > > > On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:13:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >> Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your side of >> the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice; so you need to start boning up on >> who is and is not aligned with you. You've successfully (and correctly) >> quoted your favorite web sites today....You just need to get down who is >> and is not aligned with you, and SueBaby is on your side! >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> as a mentee of Madeline Albright, Rice is a zionist to ignore ... and >>> you have no clue. >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:15:31 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>> >>>> Geesh......You have no clue. You really don't. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Susan Rice >>>>> --- >>>>> a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://allenbwest.com/> >>>>>> incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? >>>>>> >>>>>> Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on >>>>>> October 13, 2014 >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: rice] >>>>>> >>>>>> So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever learn >>>>>> it’s a bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk show? The former >>>>>> U.S. Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for her five Sunday >>>>>> talk show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi attack was a >>>>>> “spontaneous reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on because >>>>>> former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to appear. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The Press >>>>>> and continued to staunchly defend her original statement about the >>>>>> anti-Islam video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That >>>>>> information >>>>>> turned out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the >>>>>> notion >>>>>> that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American >>>>>> people is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply >>>>>> demonstrated.” >>>>>> >>>>>> Riiiight. >>>>>> >>>>>> So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking on a >>>>>> Sunday talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he probably had >>>>>> no >>>>>> clue. After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his intel briefings. >>>>>> And >>>>>> I guess Obama is “too tired” from all those fundraisers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... >>>>>> >>>>>> Inform >>>>>> >>>>>> Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — further >>>>>> advanced the idea that she is either blatantly incompetent or just REALLY >>>>>> blatantly incompetent. >>>>>> >>>>>> As reported by the Washington Free Beacon >>>>>> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, >>>>>> “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the strategy >>>>>> to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS >>>>>> or >>>>>> ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the Obama >>>>>> administration is still not considering boots on the ground. “This is >>>>>> very >>>>>> early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do what we >>>>>> can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the Kurds, >>>>>> and >>>>>> ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able to >>>>>> control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the >>>>>> Press.” >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the >>>>>> definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing expecting >>>>>> different results.” >>>>>> >>>>>> Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that when >>>>>> the enemy is still capable of conducting offensive operations — which the >>>>>> entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly not >>>>>> destroying >>>>>> them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States has >>>>>> been missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it was just two >>>>>> weeks ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al Anbar >>>>>> province >>>>>> north of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. >>>>>> >>>>>> And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss hasn’t given >>>>>> the Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes is not support, where >>>>>> are the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, what “moderate >>>>>> opposition?” You mean the fellas who say they’ll continue to fight Bashar >>>>>> al-Assad regardless of what resources we provide? Perhaps Ms. Rice needs >>>>>> to >>>>>> sit in front of a map and understand that ISIS is at Abu Gharaib — you >>>>>> know >>>>>> that place where the progressive socialists kept telling us about when >>>>>> Bush >>>>>> was president. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There has >>>>>> been no recommendation from the American military commanders, either on >>>>>> the >>>>>> ground or here in Washington, that the United States put any ground >>>>>> combat >>>>>> forces into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone at the White >>>>>> House and I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The president has >>>>>> been very plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or even would >>>>>> benefit from, American ground troops in combat again.” >>>>>> >>>>>> I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting such an >>>>>> option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The question is why >>>>>> would >>>>>> these commanders bring up the option — which they did back in 2011 for a >>>>>> residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent ideologue in >>>>>> Barack >>>>>> Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is telling the >>>>>> commanders what is and is not required in this “very significant >>>>>> counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be >>>>>> conducted >>>>>> over a long period of time.” >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground options >>>>>> ready to be presented — but we have a rookie Commander-in-Chief telling >>>>>> them to “talk to the hand.” >>>>>> >>>>>> As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” >>>>>> >>>>>> And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same sheet of >>>>>> music as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on another Sunday >>>>>> Show addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. Dempsey pointed >>>>>> to >>>>>> Mosul as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be recommended. ABC’s >>>>>> Martha Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be more effective against ISIS if >>>>>> we had U.S. troops on the ground spotting targets?” “Yeah. There will be >>>>>> circumstances when the answer to that question will likely be yes, but I >>>>>> haven’t encountered one right now,” Dempsey said.” >>>>>> >>>>>> C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be totally >>>>>> effective in Kobani. >>>>>> >>>>>> “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground campaign at >>>>>> some point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security Forces] are ready to >>>>>> go >>>>>> back on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My instinct at this point is >>>>>> that that will require a different kind of advising and assisting because >>>>>> of the complexity of that fight.” >>>>>> >>>>>> I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses from the >>>>>> senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in combination with >>>>>> SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, and SecState Kerry spells >>>>>> serious trouble for our Republic and its national security. >>>>>> >>>>>> This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts have >>>>>> various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the one hand, >>>>>> we’re >>>>>> trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means the Iraqi >>>>>> army, >>>>>> the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up that capacity >>>>>> and we have seen some success in that regard. On the Syrian side, we also >>>>>> have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate opposition, and >>>>>> giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to fight Assad >>>>>> and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice continued. “Our >>>>>> air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by merely what >>>>>> happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity for the >>>>>> Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi Army got routed >>>>>> just two weeks ago? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out and >>>>>> blamed ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more credibility >>>>>> sticking to that lie than trying to make up new ones. ISIS must be >>>>>> laughing >>>>>> and thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in arising at such a time of >>>>>> American weakness and incompetence. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> >>>>>> >>>>>> - New Members >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> >>>>>> 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> >>>>>> • Privacy >>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • >>>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>>> >>>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
