Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your side of the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice --- I describe her as a zionist warmonger and you think I'm on her side? get a clue ... I don't support zionists or warmongering neocons.
On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:13:21 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Madaline "I Just Discovered I Am A Jewess" Albright is from your side of > the aisle Plain Ol'....As is Susan Rice; so you need to start boning up on > who is and is not aligned with you. You've successfully (and correctly) > quoted your favorite web sites today....You just need to get down who is > and is not aligned with you, and SueBaby is on your side! > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> as a mentee of Madeline Albright, Rice is a zionist to ignore ... and you >> have no clue. >> >> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:15:31 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>> Geesh......You have no clue. You really don't. >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Susan Rice >>>> --- >>>> a silver spoon fed warmongering zionist to ignore. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:47:51 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <http://allenbwest.com/> >>>>> incompetent or just REALLY blatantly incompetent? >>>>> >>>>> Written by Allen West <http://allenbwest.com/author/allen/> on >>>>> October 13, 2014 >>>>> >>>>> [image: rice] >>>>> >>>>> So I just have to wonder, will the Obama administration ever learn >>>>> it’s a bad idea to wheel out Susan Rice on a Sunday talk show? The former >>>>> U.S. Ambassador to the UN will always be remembered for her five Sunday >>>>> talk show appearances where she claimed the Benghazi attack was a >>>>> “spontaneous reaction to a crude anti-Islam video” and she was on because >>>>> former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “too tired” to appear. >>>>> >>>>> Rice later appeared as National Security Advisor on Meet The Press and >>>>> continued to staunchly defend her original statement about the anti-Islam >>>>> video — which we now know was a lie. She said, “That information turned >>>>> out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct. But the notion that >>>>> somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American >>>>> people >>>>> is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.” >>>>> >>>>> Riiiight. >>>>> >>>>> So if there’s ANYONE you’d think Obama wouldn’t want speaking on a >>>>> Sunday talk show it would be Susan Rice — but then hey, he probably had >>>>> no >>>>> clue. After all, he’s only been to 42.1 percent of his intel briefings. >>>>> And >>>>> I guess Obama is “too tired” from all those fundraisers. >>>>> >>>>> Susan Rice: Fight Against ISIS A... >>>>> >>>>> Inform >>>>> >>>>> Nonetheless, yesterday Rice — the National Security Advisor — further >>>>> advanced the idea that she is either blatantly incompetent or just REALLY >>>>> blatantly incompetent. >>>>> >>>>> As reported by the Washington Free Beacon >>>>> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/rice-defends-us-islamic-state-strategy/>, >>>>> >>>>> “On Sunday, Rice said the United States would not reevaluate the strategy >>>>> to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS >>>>> or >>>>> ISIL), despite its recent territorial advances, and said that the Obama >>>>> administration is still not considering boots on the ground. “This is >>>>> very >>>>> early days of the strategy. The strategy is very clear. We’ll do what we >>>>> can from the air. We will support the Iraqi security forces, the Kurds, >>>>> and >>>>> ultimately over time, the moderate opposition in Syria to be able to >>>>> control territory and take the fight to ISIL,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the >>>>> Press.” >>>>> >>>>> I believe a very astute and brilliant person once stated, “the >>>>> definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing expecting >>>>> different results.” >>>>> >>>>> Would someone please advise the National Security Advisor that when >>>>> the enemy is still capable of conducting offensive operations — which the >>>>> entire world sees — you ain’t degrading nothin’ — certainly not >>>>> destroying >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> Seems like the National Security Advisor of the United States has been >>>>> missing some intel briefings herself. First of all, it was just two weeks >>>>> ago that ISIS overran an Iraqi Army base in western Al Anbar province >>>>> north >>>>> of Fallujah — more troops were massacred. >>>>> >>>>> And if she was reading this website, she’d know her boss hasn’t given >>>>> the Kurds any support whatsoever — a few airstrikes is not support, where >>>>> are the arms for the Kurds Ms. Rice? And lastly, what “moderate >>>>> opposition?” You mean the fellas who say they’ll continue to fight Bashar >>>>> al-Assad regardless of what resources we provide? Perhaps Ms. Rice needs >>>>> to >>>>> sit in front of a map and understand that ISIS is at Abu Gharaib — you >>>>> know >>>>> that place where the progressive socialists kept telling us about when >>>>> Bush >>>>> was president. >>>>> >>>>> Here’s another example of the absurdity of Susan Rice: “There has been >>>>> no recommendation from the American military commanders, either on the >>>>> ground or here in Washington, that the United States put any ground >>>>> combat >>>>> forces into Iraq. That has not come up the chain to anyone at the White >>>>> House and I don’t anticipate that it will,” Rice said. “The president has >>>>> been very plain that this is not a campaign that requires, or even would >>>>> benefit from, American ground troops in combat again.” >>>>> >>>>> I seem to recall the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs presenting such an >>>>> option before a Senate Armed Services Committee. The question is why >>>>> would >>>>> these commanders bring up the option — which they did back in 2011 for a >>>>> residual force in Iraq — when you have an intransigent ideologue in >>>>> Barack >>>>> Hussein Obama who, in his vast military experience, is telling the >>>>> commanders what is and is not required in this “very significant >>>>> counter-terrorism operation with many moving parts which will be >>>>> conducted >>>>> over a long period of time.” >>>>> >>>>> I’m quite sure military planners have the American ground options >>>>> ready to be presented — but we have a rookie Commander-in-Chief telling >>>>> them to “talk to the hand.” >>>>> >>>>> As Oprah said about Obama, “brilliant.” >>>>> >>>>> And once again the Obama administration isn’t on the same sheet of >>>>> music as his generals — because CJCS Gen. Dempsey was on another Sunday >>>>> Show addressing same issue. As the Beacon reports, Gen. Dempsey pointed >>>>> to >>>>> Mosul as an instance where U.S. ground troops may be recommended. ABC’s >>>>> Martha Raddatz asked Dempsey, “Would we be more effective against ISIS if >>>>> we had U.S. troops on the ground spotting targets?” “Yeah. There will be >>>>> circumstances when the answer to that question will likely be yes, but I >>>>> haven’t encountered one right now,” Dempsey said.” >>>>> >>>>> C’mon Gen. Dempsey, you know darn well that SOFLAMs* would be totally >>>>> effective in Kobani. >>>>> >>>>> “Mosul will likely be the decisive battle in the ground campaign at >>>>> some point in the future. When [the Iraqi Security Forces] are ready to >>>>> go >>>>> back on the offensive (uh, in my lifetime?) My instinct at this point is >>>>> that that will require a different kind of advising and assisting because >>>>> of the complexity of that fight.” >>>>> >>>>> I must admit, rarely have I seen such politicized responses from the >>>>> senior uniformed leader of our military, which taken in combination with >>>>> SecDef Hagel, National Security Advisor Rice, and SecState Kerry spells >>>>> serious trouble for our Republic and its national security. >>>>> >>>>> This statement by Rice demonstrates her delusion: “Our efforts have >>>>> various, different lines of effort, as we call them. On the one hand, >>>>> we’re >>>>> trying to build up the capacity of the Iraqis, which means the Iraqi >>>>> army, >>>>> the Kurds – the Peshmerga inside of Iraq… we’re building up that capacity >>>>> and we have seen some success in that regard. On the Syrian side, we also >>>>> have a longer-term challenge of supporting the moderate opposition, and >>>>> giving them, while they have great will, greater capacity to fight Assad >>>>> and to fight ISIL.” So, this is going to take time,” Rice continued. “Our >>>>> air campaign is off to a strong start… it can’t be judged by merely what >>>>> happens in one particular town or in one particular region.” >>>>> >>>>> There is no air campaign. We are not building up any capacity for the >>>>> Kurdish Peshmerga Army. And where were we when the Iraqi Army got routed >>>>> just two weeks ago? >>>>> >>>>> I think it would have been better if Rice had just come out and blamed >>>>> ISIS on an anti-Islam video — she would have had more credibility >>>>> sticking >>>>> to that lie than trying to make up new ones. ISIS must be laughing and >>>>> thanking the moon god Allah for its luck in arising at such a time of >>>>> American weakness and incompetence. >>>>> >>>>> *Special Operations Forces Laser Markers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> __._,_.___ >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Visit Your Group >>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbXZidTc1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyNDQxNzk-> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - New Members >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaTJhdGtzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjQ0MTc5> >>>>> >>>>> 1 >>>>> >>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGJzNDVnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzI0NDE3OQ--> >>>>> >>>>> • Privacy >>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • >>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>>>> >>>>> __,_._,___ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
