*"more proof that he's an idiot".*

=====

Or.....That you are; and like most Secular Progressive Democrats, social
justice warriors, and other imbeciles;  you haven't a clue.


On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Trump believes that we can nip this problem in the bud rather succinctly;
> and with calculated, strategic combat operations.
> ---
> more proof that he's an idiot.
>
>
> On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 10:29:58 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> A couple of points and an observation to your post Geoffrey:
>>
>> First,  Donald Trump is the only candidate that I've heard in the last 16
>> years who expresses his belief that this whole Terrorism threat can be
>> remediated within a very short time.  Unlike President Bush, President
>> Obama, and purported terrorist experts John McCain and Lindsey "Chinless"
>> Graham, all who emphasize and repeat constantly that this Middle Eastern
>> terrorism, caused by only a few "Radical Islamic Fundamentalists"  (Because
>> Islam is a religion of peace);  will take years; even decades to get a
>> handle on.  McCain even said on several occasions that this was truly a
>> "Hundred Year War"!  Trump believes that we can nip this problem in the bud
>> rather succinctly; and with calculated, strategic combat operations.
>>
>> I agree with him, and have never bought into this whole campaign of
>> taking decades to whip this Islamic Jihad.
>>
>> Second, President Obama has literally decimated our military, both from
>> an economic standpoint;  e.g.; equipment; troop strength;  technology;
>> etc.;  I dare say that our military is far worse in 2016 than it was in
>> 1980 after President Carter did the same thing to our military.
>>
>> More importantly, President Obama as purposely and tactfully done away
>> with and attacked those military leaders, strategists;  Generals; and
>> logistics personnel who were conservative;  those who didn't see the
>> Islamic world in his purview; and I believe Obama has literally gutted our
>> military leadership purposely....One can only assume for whatever reason(s)
>> this was done.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ​Had this taken place in a redneck bar in Mississippi, the casualty rate
>>> would have been no more than two or three, including Omar himself as a
>>> casualty.
>>> ​
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:17 AM, geoffrey theist <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> First of all there is no way to prevent another Orlando attack. Besides
>>>> had it been carried out in a bar full of rednecks in Mississippi this
>>>> wouldn't still be making news.
>>>>   Terrorism is being used to justify the creation of a
>>>> police/surveillance state in this country the article submitted by Travis
>>>> only backs that up.we also have the Patriot act 1 and 2, NSA surveillance
>>>> of electronic communications without a warrant, Suspension of habeas
>>>> corpus, attacks on civil liberties and our bill of rights. I can go on and
>>>> on. I will not quite quote Ben Franklin by saying those who are willing to
>>>> sacrifice freedom for security will wind up with neither.
>>>>   Secondly how many lives and resources are we going to waste with no
>>>> results before we say enough is enough. Our middle east policy is a
>>>> complete and total failure. We are once again bogged down in an endless
>>>> quagmire much like viet nam. We don't have the will or the leadership to
>>>> win a tactical conflict such as this. Killing the enemy before they get
>>>> here is bush doctrine bullshit that hasn't worked. I guess we have been
>>>> under the erroneous impression that these Muslims don't have the capacity
>>>> to react or adapt to our tactics which     brings us back to we can't
>>>> prevent another Orlando style attack.
>>>> If you don't  want your house set on fire arsonist shouldn't be your
>>>> invited guests.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to