Well I can't disagree with you there. But IMO, to only vote "nay" against the nutjob left isn't enough. They need to aggressively be passing legislation to roll back the crap the nutjob left is doing and has done. A prime example would be how they did essentially nothing to repeal and replace Obamacare (hell, the republicans didn't even put pen to paper and come up with an alternative until this year)! Same with sitting idly by and doing nothing as the POS in Chief used his pen and his phone to shit all over the Constitution and pass his own immigration laws.
And don't even get me started on the Legislative Branch's TOTAL AND COMPLETE failure to exercise proper oversight of government agencies. We never hear about the crap these agencies do until it blows up. If they were doing their job and reigning in the excesses of government, they'd be passing laws to restrict what these non-elected bureaucrats can do with taxpayer dollars. They have a duty and an obligation to keep the other branches of government in check, and quite frankly, have failed MISERABLY at doing so. I also wouldn't mind seeing them checking the power of the Supreme Court as well, considering the diarrhea that recently flowed freely from the mouth of the SC's biggest leftloon hack, Ruth Bader Ginsburg! She should have been censured at the very least IMO. On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with the criteria used to judge "effectiveness.....To > me, anyone who votes "Nay" for anything even looked at or brought up by a > Democrat is effective to me. > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:17 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> 2.5 to 1, in fact. See if yours made the list... >> >> >> http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/stories/5278/least-effective-members-congress?utm_medium=cm&utm_source=outbrain&utm_campaign=rt.cm.ob.dt.5278#1-Sen-Robert-P-Casey-Jr >> >> I can almost understand the newbies who have only been there 3 years and >> haven't purchased enough influence, but look at how many of these have been >> there for YEARS without sponsoring even a single bill that ever made it >> through committee! >> >> You have to wonder about the abject stupidity of a constituency that >> would continue re-electing such failures. :( >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
