Bull Hockey Plain Ol! You've been marching down that Socialist Road To Utopia for at least a year now! --- wrong again, xian puke. we know who promotes socialism and why.
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 9:01:06 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Bull Hockey Plain Ol! You've been marching down that Socialist Road To > Utopia for at least a year now! > > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I think Keith and I were both talking about the socialist bullshit you >> seem to be in favor of >> --- >> I'm not in favor of socialism or those who promote it. That's my biggest >> beef with the DNC, Hillary, and Bernie's klan. >> Among the Libertarian circles, Socialism and Communism are frequently >> regarded as the greatest evil — that is, to say, the greatest opposition to >> liberty, and anything to oppose freedom must considered an evil. >> >> Republicans made great strides in America when they took up causes for >> personal liberty. >> Here's a good article on party platforms in US history: >> http://factmyth.com/factoids/democrats-and-republicans-switched-platforms/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 5:14:12 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>> >>> >>> I think Keith and I were both talking about the socialist bullshit you >>> seem to be in favor of anymore. >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 6:08:31 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote: >>>> >>>> we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on repealing laws, not >>>> creating new ones >>>> --- >>>> yeah, the blue laws, homophobic, and pro-xian laws have got to go. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 2:27:01 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Perp! >>>>> >>>>> I agree with you; and for years I was pretty much advocating what you >>>>> are suggesting; that we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on >>>>> repealing laws, not creating new ones, and the only "New" government >>>>> agency >>>>> created should be one for placing terminated government agents back into >>>>> the private sector. >>>>> >>>>> I still feel that way. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:09 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well I can't disagree with you there. But IMO, to only vote "nay" >>>>>> against the nutjob left isn't enough. They need to aggressively be >>>>>> passing >>>>>> legislation to roll back the crap the nutjob left is doing and has done. >>>>>> A >>>>>> prime example would be how they did essentially nothing to repeal and >>>>>> replace Obamacare (hell, the republicans didn't even put pen to paper >>>>>> and >>>>>> come up with an alternative until this year)! Same with sitting idly by >>>>>> and >>>>>> doing nothing as the POS in Chief used his pen and his phone to shit all >>>>>> over the Constitution and pass his own immigration laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> And don't even get me started on the Legislative Branch's TOTAL AND >>>>>> COMPLETE failure to exercise proper oversight of government agencies. We >>>>>> never hear about the crap these agencies do until it blows up. If they >>>>>> were >>>>>> doing their job and reigning in the excesses of government, they'd be >>>>>> passing laws to restrict what these non-elected bureaucrats can do with >>>>>> taxpayer dollars. >>>>>> >>>>>> They have a duty and an obligation to keep the other branches of >>>>>> government in check, and quite frankly, have failed MISERABLY at doing >>>>>> so. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also wouldn't mind seeing them checking the power of the Supreme >>>>>> Court as well, considering the diarrhea that recently flowed freely from >>>>>> the mouth of the SC's biggest leftloon hack, Ruth Bader Ginsburg! She >>>>>> should have been censured at the very least IMO. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure I agree with the criteria used to judge >>>>>>> "effectiveness.....To me, anyone who votes "Nay" for anything even >>>>>>> looked >>>>>>> at or brought up by a Democrat is effective to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:17 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2.5 to 1, in fact. See if yours made the list... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/stories/5278/least-effective-members-congress?utm_medium=cm&utm_source=outbrain&utm_campaign=rt.cm.ob.dt.5278#1-Sen-Robert-P-Casey-Jr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can almost understand the newbies who have only been there 3 >>>>>>>> years and haven't purchased enough influence, but look at how many of >>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>> have been there for YEARS without sponsoring even a single bill that >>>>>>>> ever >>>>>>>> made it through committee! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have to wonder about the abject stupidity of a constituency >>>>>>>> that would continue re-electing such failures. :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>>> For options & help see >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
