we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on repealing laws, not creating new ones --- yeah, the blue laws, homophobic, and pro-xian laws have got to go.
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 2:27:01 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Hey Perp! > > I agree with you; and for years I was pretty much advocating what you are > suggesting; that we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on repealing > laws, not creating new ones, and the only "New" government agency created > should be one for placing terminated government agents back into the > private sector. > > I still feel that way. > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:09 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Well I can't disagree with you there. But IMO, to only vote "nay" against >> the nutjob left isn't enough. They need to aggressively be passing >> legislation to roll back the crap the nutjob left is doing and has done. A >> prime example would be how they did essentially nothing to repeal and >> replace Obamacare (hell, the republicans didn't even put pen to paper and >> come up with an alternative until this year)! Same with sitting idly by and >> doing nothing as the POS in Chief used his pen and his phone to shit all >> over the Constitution and pass his own immigration laws. >> >> And don't even get me started on the Legislative Branch's TOTAL AND >> COMPLETE failure to exercise proper oversight of government agencies. We >> never hear about the crap these agencies do until it blows up. If they were >> doing their job and reigning in the excesses of government, they'd be >> passing laws to restrict what these non-elected bureaucrats can do with >> taxpayer dollars. >> >> They have a duty and an obligation to keep the other branches of >> government in check, and quite frankly, have failed MISERABLY at doing so. >> >> I also wouldn't mind seeing them checking the power of the Supreme Court >> as well, considering the diarrhea that recently flowed freely from the >> mouth of the SC's biggest leftloon hack, Ruth Bader Ginsburg! She should >> have been censured at the very least IMO. >> >> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure I agree with the criteria used to judge >>> "effectiveness.....To me, anyone who votes "Nay" for anything even looked >>> at or brought up by a Democrat is effective to me. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:17 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> 2.5 to 1, in fact. See if yours made the list... >>>> >>>> >>>> http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/stories/5278/least-effective-members-congress?utm_medium=cm&utm_source=outbrain&utm_campaign=rt.cm.ob.dt.5278#1-Sen-Robert-P-Casey-Jr >>>> >>>> I can almost understand the newbies who have only been there 3 years >>>> and haven't purchased enough influence, but look at how many of these have >>>> been there for YEARS without sponsoring even a single bill that ever made >>>> it through committee! >>>> >>>> You have to wonder about the abject stupidity of a constituency that >>>> would continue re-electing such failures. :( >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
