I think Keith and I were both talking about the socialist bullshit you seem to be in favor of anymore.
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 6:08:31 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote: > > we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on repealing laws, not > creating new ones > --- > yeah, the blue laws, homophobic, and pro-xian laws have got to go. > > On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 2:27:01 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: >> >> Hey Perp! >> >> I agree with you; and for years I was pretty much advocating what you >> are suggesting; that we needed to have a Congress focused strictly on >> repealing laws, not creating new ones, and the only "New" government agency >> created should be one for placing terminated government agents back into >> the private sector. >> >> I still feel that way. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:09 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Well I can't disagree with you there. But IMO, to only vote "nay" >>> against the nutjob left isn't enough. They need to aggressively be passing >>> legislation to roll back the crap the nutjob left is doing and has done. A >>> prime example would be how they did essentially nothing to repeal and >>> replace Obamacare (hell, the republicans didn't even put pen to paper and >>> come up with an alternative until this year)! Same with sitting idly by and >>> doing nothing as the POS in Chief used his pen and his phone to shit all >>> over the Constitution and pass his own immigration laws. >>> >>> And don't even get me started on the Legislative Branch's TOTAL AND >>> COMPLETE failure to exercise proper oversight of government agencies. We >>> never hear about the crap these agencies do until it blows up. If they were >>> doing their job and reigning in the excesses of government, they'd be >>> passing laws to restrict what these non-elected bureaucrats can do with >>> taxpayer dollars. >>> >>> They have a duty and an obligation to keep the other branches of >>> government in check, and quite frankly, have failed MISERABLY at doing so. >>> >>> I also wouldn't mind seeing them checking the power of the Supreme Court >>> as well, considering the diarrhea that recently flowed freely from the >>> mouth of the SC's biggest leftloon hack, Ruth Bader Ginsburg! She should >>> have been censured at the very least IMO. >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I agree with the criteria used to judge >>>> "effectiveness.....To me, anyone who votes "Nay" for anything even looked >>>> at or brought up by a Democrat is effective to me. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:17 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2.5 to 1, in fact. See if yours made the list... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/stories/5278/least-effective-members-congress?utm_medium=cm&utm_source=outbrain&utm_campaign=rt.cm.ob.dt.5278#1-Sen-Robert-P-Casey-Jr >>>>> >>>>> I can almost understand the newbies who have only been there 3 years >>>>> and haven't purchased enough influence, but look at how many of these >>>>> have >>>>> been there for YEARS without sponsoring even a single bill that ever made >>>>> it through committee! >>>>> >>>>> You have to wonder about the abject stupidity of a constituency that >>>>> would continue re-electing such failures. :( >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
