Sure. It is out of control and has been for years. I hope Trump shuts the 
spigot off entirely and forces these gd businesses to start hiring 
Americans in America!

On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 10:45:17 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote:
>
> This is why one asks questions thanks perp
>
> On Jan 29, 2017 9:39 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> If you talk to people in the tech industry, they have been screaming 
>> about tech companies importing H1B visa foreigners to take jobs here in 
>> America for years.
>>
>> Now, we're seeing the same issue in healthcare. Ever notice how these 
>> massive health systems are gobbling up all the smaller (county) hospitals 
>> and merging with other mid-larger ones? And they're buying out all of the 
>> doctors' practices too? Well guess what? These hospitals - even though they 
>> make millions every year in profit - are categorized as non-profits. And 
>> they are exempt from the government caps on H1B visas. So they're filling 
>> their positions with them like crazy. The universities are doing the same.
>>
>> So yeah, the "legal" immigrants are very much a huge problem and one the 
>> government and media have kept hidden from the public for FAR too long. We 
>> have tens of millions of people in this country - some educated and some 
>> not - who can't find jobs. This shit needs to stop. The f*cking government 
>> has spent years encouraging students here to get STEM degrees only to tell 
>> them when they get one that there are no jobs b/c they've either been 
>> outsourced to India or they're hiring Indians and Chinese to do them here.
>>
>> On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 5:06:04 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote:
>>>
>>> Legal immigrants aren't the problem to extent that the illegals are but 
>>> they are drawing attention to the legal immigrants. The percentage of sheer 
>>> numbers of citizens being displaced by out sourcing and illegal immigrants 
>>> far out weights legal immigration
>>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2017 3:57 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's the deluge of immigrants, both legal and illegal, pouring 
>>> into Western Nations. 
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The *Immigration Act of 1990* (Pub.L. 101–649 
>>> <http://legislink.org/us/pl-101-649>, 104 Stat. 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large> 4978 
>>> <http://legislink.org/us/stat-104-4978>, enacted November 29, 1990) was 
>>> signed into law by George H. W. Bush 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush> on November 29, 1990.
>>> [1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-1> It 
>>> was first introduced by Senator Ted Kennedy 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy> in 1989. It was a national 
>>> reform of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965>. 
>>> It increased total, overall immigration to allow 700,000 immigrants to come 
>>> to the U.S. per year for the fiscal years '92–'94, and 675,000 per year 
>>> after that.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>  It 
>>> provided family based immigration visa, created five distinct employment 
>>> based visas, categorized by occupation, as well as the diversity visa 
>>> program which created a lottery to admit immigrants from "low admittance" 
>>> countries [3] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-US_immigration_legislation-3>
>>>  or 
>>> countries where their citizenry was underrepresented in the U.S.
>>>
>>> Besides these immigrant visas there was also changes in nonimmigrant 
>>> visas like the H-1B visa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa> for 
>>> highly skilled workers. There were also cutbacks in the allotment of visas 
>>> available for extended relatives.[4] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Immigration_Act_of_1990_Blue_title-4>
>>>  The Temporary protected status 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_protected_status> visa was 
>>> also created where Congress established a procedure by which the Attorney 
>>> General may provide TPS to immigrants in the United States who are 
>>> temporarily unable to safely return to their home country because of 
>>> ongoing armed conflict, an environmental disaster, or other extraordinary 
>>> and temporary condition. It specifically benefited citizens of El 
>>> Salvador <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Salvador>.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>
>>> Other aspects of the act include lifting the English testing process for 
>>> naturalization which was imposed in the Naturalization Act of 1906 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1906> [5] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Boundless-5>
>>>  and 
>>> eliminating the exclusion of homosexuals under the medically unsound 
>>> classification of "sexual deviant" that was present in the passage of the 
>>> 1965 Act.[6] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Homosexual_liberation-6>
>>>  George 
>>> H. W. Bush is quoted in saying "I am also pleased to note that this Act 
>>> facilitates immigration not just in numerical terms, but also in terms of 
>>> basic entry rights of those beyond our borders."[7] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-G_Bush-7> 
>>> The 
>>> administration, therefore, saw the importance of this amendment in 
>>> extending a welcoming to those previously excluded nations/individuals.
>>>
>>> Contents  [hide] 
>>>
>>>    - 1Family reunification 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Family_reunification>
>>>    - 2Job-based immigration 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Job-based_immigration>
>>>    - 3Diversity Immigrant Visas 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Diversity_Immigrant_Visas>
>>>    - 4Comments from the Bush Administration 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Comments_from_the_Bush_Administration>
>>>    - 5Non-immigrant visas 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Non-immigrant_visas>
>>>    - 6Significance 
>>>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#Significance>
>>>    - 7References 
>>>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#References>
>>>
>>> Family reunification[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=1>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Family reunification remained a priority as it had been in the Immigration 
>>> and Nationality Act of 1965 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965>. 
>>> This act expanded the number of family-based immigration visas allotted per 
>>> year to 480,000 but to do this it also made the definition of family more 
>>> exclusive by limiting it to immediate family members.[4] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Immigration_Act_of_1990_Blue_title-4>
>>> Job-based immigration[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=2>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Job-based immigration was divided amongst five occupational categories 
>>> in the 1990 Immigration act (in the 1965 act only two existed.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>  The 
>>> act provided 140,000 visas per year for job based immigration.[4] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Immigration_Act_of_1990_Blue_title-4>
>>>  These 
>>> categories were:
>>>
>>>    - EB-1 visa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-1_visa> (for an alien 
>>>    of extraordinary ability 
>>>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_of_extraordinary_ability>)
>>>    - EB-2 visa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-2_visa>
>>>    - EB-3 visa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-3_visa>
>>>    - EB-4 visa 
>>>    
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EB-4_visa&action=edit&redlink=1>
>>>    - EB-5 visa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EB-5_visa>
>>>
>>> The EB 4 visa is a vague but has to do with religious workers who wish 
>>> to continue their career in the U.S. The reason for this distinct category 
>>> is because the other visas require employer contact and labor certification 
>>> through the U.S. Department of Labor 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Labor>, 
>>> while the religious worker visa applicant is not strictly limited to 
>>> employer-sponsored entry.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>
>>> In addition to having to be employer-sponsored, in most cases, the 
>>> foreigner had to be applying to work in an area of labor shortage in the 
>>> U.S. and if this was not the case, the employer had to bargain on their 
>>> behalf and proves that they had exhausted all other domestic recruiting 
>>> efforts.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>> Diversity Immigrant Visas[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=3>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Diversity Immigrant Visa 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Immigrant_Visa> was a new, 
>>> important facet of the amendment that had never been instituted in national 
>>> immigration policy before. "Starting in 1991, every year the Attorney 
>>> General <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General>, 
>>> decides from information gathered over the most recent five year period the 
>>> regions or country that are considered High Admission or Low Admission 
>>> States"[8] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-8> from 
>>> this analysis citizens of certain nations are deemed eligible or ineligible 
>>> to apply for a diversity visa. "A High Admission region or country is one 
>>> that has had 50,000 immigrants or more acquire a permanent residency visa. 
>>> The High Admission regions are not given visas under this act in order to 
>>> promote diversity."[3] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-US_immigration_legislation-3>
>>>  Starting 
>>> in fiscal year 1995, the cap of 55,000 visas were allotted as "diversity" 
>>> visas. Today it is more around 50,000. Changes have been made to the 
>>> diversity visa requirements almost every other year (if not more) since 
>>> 1990 to assess which countries qualify (see Diversity Immigrant Visa 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Immigrant_Visa>). In 1990 the 
>>> qualifying countries were as follows: Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Austria, 
>>> Belgium, Czech republic, Slovakia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France 
>>> (including Guadeloupe and New Caledonia), Germany, Great Britain and 
>>> Northern Ireland (including Bermuda and Gibraltar), Hungary, Iceland, 
>>> Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, 
>>> Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, San Marino, Sweden, 
>>> Switzerland and Tunisia.[9] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Stanford-9>
>>>  There 
>>> are a number of qualifications to obtaining this visa besides being from 
>>> one of the qualifying zones. You must:
>>>
>>>    - Have a high school diploma
>>>    - Have 2 years work experience and 2 years job training
>>>
>>> In addition, the SOS keeps track of age, occupation, education, etc. of 
>>> all immigrants obtaining this visa. The selection of qualifying applicants 
>>> is random. Once you are approved and granted a visa, family unification 
>>> does extend to these visa holders. Children and spouses are eligible for 
>>> permanent residency. This policy, notably, positively effected displaced 
>>> Tibetans from 1991–1994 who were given 1,000 visas per year.[3] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-US_immigration_legislation-3>
>>> Comments from the Bush Administration[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=4>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> George Bush: "S. 358 accomplishes what this Administration sought from 
>>> the outset of the immigration reform process: a complementary blending of 
>>> our tradition of family reunification with increased immigration of skilled 
>>> individuals to meet our economic needs."
>>>
>>> "Today I am pleased to sign S. 358, the 'Immigration Act of 1990'—the 
>>> most comprehensive reform of our immigration laws in 66 years."
>>>
>>> "Immigration reform began in 1986 with an effort to close the "back 
>>> door" on illegal immigration through enactment of the 1986 Immigration 
>>> Reform and Control Act 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Reform_and_Control_Act_of_1986> 
>>> (IRCA). 
>>> Now, as we open the "front door" to increased legal immigration, I am 
>>> pleased that this Act also provides needed enforcement authority."
>>>
>>> "I am also pleased to note that this Act facilitates immigration not 
>>> just in numerical terms, but also in terms of basic entry rights of those 
>>> beyond our borders. S. 358 revises the politically related "exclusion 
>>> grounds" for the first time since their enactment in 1952."[7] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-G_Bush-7>
>>> Non-immigrant visas[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=5>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Controversy over the immigration act of 1990 stemmed mostly from the 
>>> expansion of the green cards available for foreign laborers while limiting 
>>> the access to temporary visas such as the H-1B visa 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa> for visiting scholars. A 
>>> bulletin released by the Stanford University News Service in Sept. 1991 
>>> claims that "Stanford, and other universities, will have to do more 
>>> paperwork to hire short-term visiting professors and researchers under the 
>>> H-1 visa program."[9] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Stanford-9>
>>>
>>> The bill also introduced a cap of 65,000 per year to H-1B and excluded 
>>> nurses, entertainers, athletes, and artists from qualifying.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>  Another 
>>> short term visa is "D" category nonimmigrants who work "aboard sea or air 
>>> carriers or as longshore workers" there were more constraints added to 
>>> their ability to obtain visas as well.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>>
>>> However, it also created new categories of nonimmigrant visas. The O and 
>>> P categories were for extraordinarily skilled foreigners in the realm of 
>>> entertainment, athletics, science, etc. Their admittance depended upon 
>>> "consultation with the appropriate unions," usually who are asking them to 
>>> the U.S. and their time allowed here depended on how long the 
>>> event/activity they were participating in lasted.[2] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Fordham_Journal_Highlights-2>
>>> Significance[edit 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_Act_of_1990&action=edit&section=6>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chart_of_foreign_born_in_the_US_labor_force_1900_to_2007.png>
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chart_of_foreign_born_in_the_US_labor_force_1900_to_2007.png>
>>> Foreign-born in US labor force 1900-2015
>>>
>>> After it became law, the United States would admit 700,000 new 
>>> immigrants annually, up from 500,000 before the bill's passage. The new 
>>> system continued to favor people with family members that already worked in 
>>> the United States, but added 50,000 "diversity visas" for countries from 
>>> which few were emigrating, as well as 40,000 permanent job-related workers 
>>> and 65,000 temporary worker visas.[10] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-10> 
>>> Additional 
>>> provisions strengthened the U.S. Border Patrol 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Border_Patrol> and altered language 
>>> regarding disease restrictions in a way that permitted the Secretary of 
>>> Health and Human Services 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services> to 
>>> remove AIDS <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS> from the list of 
>>> illnesses making a prospective immigrant ineligible to enter the country.
>>> [11] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Aids_restriction_lifted-11>
>>>
>>> Following the passage of this act, there were more immigrants admitted 
>>> to the U.S. in this decade than any prior decade in U.S. history with 10–11 
>>> million documented entries.[5] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Boundless-5>
>>>
>>> This act also led to the creation of the *Jordan Commission or the U.S. 
>>> Commission on Immigration Reform*. The Commission released 4 reports 
>>> covering every aspect of U.S. Immigration policy and evaluated its quality 
>>> and effectiveness, making recommendations based on their findings.[12] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Jordan_Commish-12>
>>>
>>> The report concluded with the following statement of principles: 
>>> "Properly-regulated immigration and immigrant policy serves the national 
>>> interest by ensuring the entry of those who will contribute most to our 
>>> society and helping lawful newcomers adjust to life in the United States. 
>>> It must give due consideration to shifting economic realities. A 
>>> well-regulated system sets priorities for admission; facilitates nuclear 
>>> family reunification; gives employers access to a global labor market while 
>>> protecting U.S. workers; helps to generate jobs and economic growth; and 
>>> fulfills our commitment to resettle refugees as one of several elements of 
>>> humanitarian protection of the persecuted."[12] 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990#cite_note-Jordan_Commish-12>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1948 
>>>
>>> The Displaced Persons Act allows up to 200,000 refugees displaced by 
>>> World War II to enter the U.S.
>>> 1950 
>>>
>>> Internal Security Act allows the deportation of any immigrants who were 
>>> ever members of the Communist Party.
>>> 1952 
>>>
>>> Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the McCarran-Walter Act) 
>>> consolidates earlier immigration legislation into one law and eliminates 
>>> race as a basis of exclusion. However, race continues to be a factor 
>>> because the quota system remains in place, except for immigrants from the 
>>> western hemisphere. Immigration from any country is capped at 1/6th of 1% 
>>> of the population of that nationality based on the 1920 census.
>>> 1965 
>>>
>>> The Immigration Act of 1965 gets rid of the nationality quotas, but 
>>> limits annual immigration from the eastern hemisphere to 170,000, with a 
>>> limit of 20,000 immigrants per country, and for the first time caps annual 
>>> immigration from the western hemisphere at 120,000, without the country 
>>> limit. In addition, a preference system is established for family members 
>>> of U.S. citizens.
>>> 1966 
>>>
>>> Cuban Adjustment Act allows Cubans to apply for permanent resident 
>>> status after residing in the U.S. for two years.
>>> 1975 
>>>
>>> At the end of the Vietnam War, the U.S. passes the Indochina Migration 
>>> and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975 that resettles about 200,000 Vietnamese 
>>> and Cambodian refugees in the U.S. and gives them a special parole status. 
>>> The program was extended to Laotians in 1976.
>>> 1978 
>>>
>>> The immigration caps outlined in the 1965 Immigration Act are replaced 
>>> with an overall annual limit of 290,000.
>>> 1980 
>>>
>>> The Refugee Act defines refugees as a person who flees his or her 
>>> country “on account of race, religion, nationality, or political opinion.” 
>>> Refugees are considered a different category than immigrants. The president 
>>> and Congress are granted the authority to establish an annual ceiling on 
>>> the number of refugees allowed into the U.S. The act also lowers the annual 
>>> limit of immigrants to 270,000, from 290,000.
>>> 1986 
>>>
>>> The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) allows immigrants 
>>> who had entered the U.S. before Jan. 1, 1982, to apply for legal status but 
>>> required them to pay fines, fees, and back taxes. It also gives the same 
>>> rights to immigrants who worked in agricultural jobs for 90 days before May 
>>> 1982. About 3 million immigrants gained legal status through the law. The 
>>> act also requires employers to verify work status of all new hires and fine 
>>> those who hire undocumented workers.
>>> 1990 
>>>
>>> The Immigration Act of 1990 sets an annual ceiling of 700,000 immigrants 
>>> for three years, and 675,000 thereafter.
>>> 1996 
>>>
>>> The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act broadens 
>>> the definition of “aggravated felony” and increases the number of crimes 
>>> classified as such so immigrants could be deported for a wider range of 
>>> crimes. The law is applied retroactively. The act also increased the number 
>>> of Border Patrol agents and established an “expedited removal” procedure to 
>>> deport immigrants without a formal hearing.
>>>
>>> Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act sharply 
>>> cuts legal permanent residents’ eligibility for many public-assistance 
>>> benefits, including food stamps, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), 
>>> Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and Medicaid.
>>> 2005 
>>>
>>> The REAL ID Act of 2005 requires states to verify a person’s immigration 
>>> status or citizenship before issuing licenses, expands restrictions on 
>>> refugees requesting asylum, and limits the habeas corpus rights of 
>>> immigrants.
>>> 2006 
>>>
>>> The REAL ID Act of 2005 requires states to verify a person’s immigration 
>>> status or citizenship before issuing licenses, expands restrictions on 
>>> refugees requesting asylum, and limits the habeas corpus rights of 
>>> immigrants.
>>> 2014 
>>>
>>> On Nov. 20, 2014, President Barack Obama announced he was taking 
>>> executive action to delay the deportation of some 5 million illegal 
>>> immigrants. Under the new policy people who are parents of U.S. citizens or 
>>> legal residents will receive deportation deferrals and authorization to 
>>> work legally if they have been in the U.S. for more than five years and 
>>> pass background checks. 
>>>
>>> On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 11:41:10 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it's the deluge of immigrants, both legal and illegal, pouring 
>>>> into Western Nations. 
>>>>
>>>> I've often said of late:  we, as a Nation could survive the onslaught 
>>>> of massive (Legal & Illegal) immigration, maybe for another decade.  We, 
>>>> as 
>>>> a Nation could most likely survive our massive debt for probably another 
>>>> decade.  We can't survive both the debt and the massive influx, and 
>>>> survive 
>>>> for another decade.  
>>>>
>>>> Something had to come to a head, and our "Cultures", both here and in 
>>>> Western Europa, were due for a "Culture Change" and both Americans and 
>>>> even 
>>>> their European socialist counterparts knew it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Kamakazee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A few things; first and foremost, the internet.  Organizing the 
>>>>> protesting has never been more efficient or easy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Secondly, and related, most of us feel the need to take care of our 
>>>>> "own" first.  
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, "things" (socially, politically, economically) have gone to 
>>>>> far to an extreme. 
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 9:57:52 AM UTC-6, gtheist957 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What does everyone think is the onus for the populist/ anti globalist 
>>>>>> movements and why now? 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>  
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>  
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to