I think it's mostly contrived and when Trump puts people back to work ,doesn't enslave black folks , and that women will not be expected to be barefoot and pregnant the furor will die down
On Jan 30, 2017 9:22 AM, "Keith In Tampa" <[email protected]> wrote: > Good Point Mitch! > > I am genuinely hoping that some of this outright hatred, opposition and > blatant, "In Your Face" Confrontation Agenda dies down and is curtailed. > It's annoying, and it makes me want to go and slap the piss out of a > Secular Progressive Moonbat. > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:22 AM, mitchscove <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Funny thing is that the Delta Airlines "systems outage" caused 150 flight >> cancellations. Trumps vetting review caused inconvenience to 109 >> travelers. Getting around Soros' terrorists to get to the airports was >> likely more of an inconvenience than either Trump or Delta caused. >> >> >> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 7:13:11 AM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote: >>> >>> For some crazy reason I was put on the no fly list maybe 10 years ago, >>> so I'm often "detained," sometimes for a couple hours. We were in Europe >>> for the holidays and I got nabbed in Barcelona and Lisbon. I was held up >>> in Lisbon for almost 4 hours, got the full-monty pat down. I've sent in >>> documentation at least a half dozen times to get of the list, but to no >>> avail. >>> >>> Agreed about the double standard of Obama's 6 month ban. Not a blip >>> from the press that I can remember. If he hasn't, Trump needs to hit this >>> on his daily twitter. >>> >>> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 3:47:20 AM UTC-6, mitchscove wrote: >>> >>>> Sounds like Obama's 6 month Iraqi ban. Remember all the demonstrations >>>> that caused? Me neither. All the left wing media outlets are doing >>>> contortions, in their normal mode of selective outrage, to make it sound >>>> like Obama's ban was just and right while Trump's 90 day review of vetting >>>> procedures is mean spirited. It doesn't help that McCain has decided to >>>> make himself a useful idiot to validate extreme media bias. >>>> >>>> If not letting Senate democrats obstruct his administration before it >>>> gets off the ground is a blunder, then I would agree. The Secretary of >>>> State would know people who should be excepted from his order. What week >>>> is this in the Democrats' confirmation hearing obstruction? As I >>>> understand the situation, of the hundreds of thousands of foreigners who >>>> enter the country, 100 people were detained for further questioning. >>>> Shoot, I was detained for further questioning boarding an Orlando to >>>> Cleveland flight because I forgot to put my wallet in the tray before >>>> walking barefooted through the metal detector a few years ago. >>>> >>>> On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 12:29:29 PM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Whilst I fully agree conceptually on his immigrant "ban," >>>>> implementation has been quirky at best, should have planned better. >>>>> >>>>> Also, I wonder how much covert surveillance operations might have been >>>>> blown due to its hasty implementation..... >>>>> >>>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
