I've got pics of 2-ply koran, 2-ply osama, 2-ply hillary, but nowhere can i
find a pic of 2-ply barry (or even b-ho). Could it be that that pic might
make it difficult to tell if one is clean or not?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jim Willis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since Obama abdicated honesty by claiming to be the tax slasher and
> defender of the universe apparently he, "and his ilk" are attempting
> to double down; gut shoot the inside straight and blanket themselves
> in constitutional credence. Honestly, this takes more cajones than an
> elephant about to mount Rosie O'Donnell. Gee, even that picture makes
> me somewhat ill.
>
> For those of us paying attention to the Obama instead of gushing
> homage we've noticed a call from the chosen one and his supporters to
> a return to the constitution and those founding principals abiding
> within the text. To the huddled masses chanting, "yes we can" this
> communal soliloquy might fly yet, for we in the top ten percent,
> firing over 90% of neurons along our synapsetic highway this is the
> epitome of lipstick on a pig.
>
> Conservatives read our constitution much as liberals read a wine list
> with pinky finger outstretched. We know it, we get it and we are
> consumed by it. We believe it to be sacrosanct and unassailable. To
> we, the people, it is an inspired document of divine genesis. For
> liberals it is merely two ply on a scroll.
>
> We have witnessed testimony, wherein posited profundities postulated
> that his holiest Barack conjoined with the ACLU, will end the
> transgression of Bush II and restore constitutionality to these amber
> waves of grain upon which God shed his grace. Oh really?
>
> The ACLU was founded by a Communist, with communist ideals, communist
> goals, and they continue to impose a Communist like agenda on America
> daily. The founder of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin stated clearly… "My
> chief aversion is the system of greed, private profit, privilege and
> violence which makes up the control of the world today, and which has
> brought it to the tragic crisis of unprecedented hunger and
> unemployment Therefore, I am for Socialism, disarmament and
> ultimately, for the abolishing of the State itself, I seek the social
> ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole
> control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
> This revelation on its face would be, "in all intellectual circles"
> game, set and match. Yet, draw near and prepare to be dazzled with
> this soon to be award winning composition, for in this endeavor, with
> talent on loan from Rush, I draw inspiration from the almighty and
> have only just begun.
> Federal Judge Phyllis Hamilton, "a Clinton appointee" recently upheld
> a ruling requiring seventh-grade students to pretend they're Muslims,
> wear Islamic garb, memorize verses from the Quran, pray to Allah and
> even to play "jihad games" in California public schools.(WND)
>
> The ACLU has refused to comment on the ruling except to say they find,
> "nothing actionable" in the ruling. Translation: the ACLU doesn't have
> a problem with it. If California public schools were requiring
> students to memorize Bible verses the ACLU would have lawyers kicking
> down the school doors and would be all over local school boards like
> Rosie O'Donnell on a baked ham. You just know they would.
>
> In 1989 the ACLU began a crusade to remove the Mount Soledad Cross
> located in the center of a Korean War Memorial in San Diego,
> California. The Cross was erected in 1954. While continuing a battle
> to have the Cross removed they have defended Muslims who have
> demanded, "Foot Basins" in airports, football stadiums and other
> public places. Foot Basins are used by Muslims in preparation for
> prayer. "Why are we constructing places of worship for them inside our
> airports?" said an airport official who requested anonymity. "Why are
> we catering to their rituals? We don't do it for any other
> religion."(WND) As Christians, let's ask airport officials for a
> chapel and see how long it takes for the ACLU to come to our aid.
> Waiting……….waiting……..
>
> While absolutely berating pharmacists, who, "because of religious
> convictions" have refused to sell "Levonelle", commonly referred to as
> the morning after pill. The ACLU defends Muslim taxi drivers who have
> refused to carry passengers who have been drinking alcohol or possess
> alcohol. The ACLU has even gone as far as to defend the rights of
> Muslim taxi drivers to refuse to carry blind patrons who avail
> themselves of a Seeing Eye dog. The Islamic religion considers dogs
> unclean. If Timmy's in the well does it matter if Lassie has had a
> bath? In a related case, it wasn't a surprise when the ACLU came to
> the defense of Muslims employed at Target stores who refused to scan
> pork products. Got Bacon?
>
> At this point I imagine liberal foreheads to be throbbing and I know
> just how to push them over the edge. Abortion, utter the word and
> liberals go running for a soapbox. In 1973 the United States Supreme
> Court found a right to privacy in the constitution where one did not
> exist. Since then over 40 million abortions have been performed.
> Abortion angers conservatives on two fronts. We believe abortion to be
> immoral and an adulteration of our constitution.
>
> The ACLU, "with a nod from the courts" has taken abortion out of the
> public debate, "or so they thought" and relegated this most important
> decision to nine justices and not to the people. Now, the ACLU is
> going after the tax exempt status of churches who dare speak out
> against abortion on moral grounds, calling such speech political. In
> 1987, the ACLU Foundation and the New York Civil Liberties Union filed
> an amicus brief in support of Abortion Rights Mobilization to secure
> standing in a suit challenging the tax exempt status of the Catholic
> Church. The Catholic Church was charged with violating its tax-exempt
> status by taking a stand against abortion. This is important and
> deserving of explanation. First the ACLU takes a pro-abortion stance
> and asks for judicial relief insomuch as abortion is a legal question
> to be removed from the political debate. After a Supreme Court
> affirmation of this argument the ACLU reverses itself and makes the
> wild claim that abortion is a political topic and those who would
> engage in the abortion debate are involved in political speech. That
> takes chutzpah folks.
> The evidence is overwhelming and I could continue to list it for days.
> The ACLU is anti-Christianity and anti-American. There can be no other
> conclusion and those who would argue differently are either an order
> of French fries short of a happy meal of need to have their
> medications refilled.
>
> Now; as to liberals suddenly drawing a bright red line as to
> constitutionality, this is just too damn easy, really it is. If you
> are a liberal with asthma, get your inhaler. If you're a leftist
> alcoholic, get your ripple. And, if you're Oprah, go shopping; you
> won't understand this.
>
> Article one, two and three provides for all federal powers allowed to
> our most benevolent government. {Sarcasm Mine} In little words, for
> you liberal little people those powers are these; provide for a common
> defense, negotiate international treaties and lastly, to settle
> disputes between the states in the arena of commerce. Period! To
> simplify; all of these sanctimonious social engineering programs
> exalted by Barry don't pass the smell test or any constitutional one.
> Sorry, you anti-Zionist Zombies, you lose. Better luck next time. But
> hey, thanks for playing.
> Conservative Springfield 13 Nov 08
> >
>
--
*~@):~{>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
