Me, too! :-) Goodnight.

On Nov 13, 9:19 pm, Doc Holliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ohhh I must study more...............
>
> Peace,
> Doc
>
> On Nov 13, 9:16 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I got sideswiped by Alcibiades and Pericles.
>
> > On Nov 13, 9:08 pm, Doc Holliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Are you sure? I still read him today. When does the fat lady sing?
>
> > > Peace,
> > > Doc
>
> > > On Nov 13, 9:02 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > But the State had the last word on Socrates, Doc.
>
> > > > On Nov 13, 8:33 pm, Doc Holliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > “May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts
> > > > > sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing
> > > > > men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition
> > > > > had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and
> > > > > security of self-government.” [emphasis added] Thomas Jefferson
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­­­-------------------------------------------------------------------------­-­-­------------------
> > > > > Are you a Zionist who spins or the other?
>
> > > > > Socrates produced a definite psychic upheaval in his fellow-
> > > > > conversationalists by helping them to see that they not only did not
> > > > > know what they thought they knew, they also were ignorant of their own
> > > > > ignorance in this regard.
>
> > > > > A Perennialist sage met a ruler. The ruler said: "If you wish, you may
> > > > > ask a favor of me." The sage replied: "I cannot seek favors from a
> > > > > slave of my slaves." "How is that?" asked the ruler. The sage replied:
> > > > > "I have two slaves who are your masters: greed and self-love."
>
> > > > > To immature people, someone helping them to become aware of their own
> > > > > ignorance doesn't seem to be help, but ridicule. Such assistance in
> > > > > recognizing their incorrect appraisal of themselves and the world
> > > > > seems to them a repudiation of their very selves and consequently
> > > > > terrible and unjustified.
>
> > > > > Peace,
> > > > > Doc
>
> > > > > On Nov 13, 8:23 pm, Jim Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Nice try, try harder!
>
> > > > > > On Nov 13, 8:14 pm, Doc Holliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Impeach Bush To Stop 
> > > > > > > Pardonshttp://www.democrats.com/pardon?cid=ZGVtczM2OTY0OWRlbXM=
>
> > > > > > > 9214 of100000people have signed – see totals by state and
> > > > > > > Congressional District.
> > > > > > > President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney stand 
> > > > > > > accused of
> > > > > > > 39 grave and impeachable offenses, including war crimes, torture,
> > > > > > > warrantless wiretapping, and outing a covert CIA operative.
>
> > > > > > > Most of these offenses are felonies for which Bush and Cheney can 
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > criminally prosecuted after they leave office. But prosecutions 
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be impossible if Bush issues blanket pre-emptive pardons for Dick
> > > > > > > Cheney, Scooter Libby, other senior officials, and even himself.
>
> > > > > > > Can Bush do this? Absolutely. Gerald Ford set the precedent in 
> > > > > > > 1974
> > > > > > > when he gave Richard Nixon a blanket pre-emptive pardon for any 
> > > > > > > crime
> > > > > > > he "may have committed."
>
> > > > > > > Presidential pardon power is nearly unlimited under the 
> > > > > > > Constitution.
> > > > > > > We support efforts in Congress to outlaw pre-emptive or 
> > > > > > > self-pardons,
> > > > > > > but even if a bill passes Congress before Bush leave office, Bush 
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > certainly veto it. So how can we stop Bush's pardons?
>
> > > > > > > The Founding Fathers clearly anticipated a corrupt President might
> > > > > > > pardon his co-conspirators, and specified impeachment as the 
> > > > > > > remedy.
>
> > > > > > > George Mason, the father of the Bill of Rights, argued at the
> > > > > > > Constitutional Convention that the President might use his 
> > > > > > > pardoning
> > > > > > > power to "pardon crimes which were advised by himself" or, before
> > > > > > > indictment or conviction, "to stop inquiry and prevent detection."
>
> > > > > > > James Madison, the father of the U.S. Constitution, added that 
> > > > > > > "if the
> > > > > > > President be connected, in any suspicious manner, with any 
> > > > > > > person, and
> > > > > > > there be grounds to believe he will shelter [pardon] him, the 
> > > > > > > House of
> > > > > > > Representatives can impeach him; they can remove him if found 
> > > > > > > guilty."
>
> > > > > > > As your constituent, I urge you to impeach George Bush and Dick 
> > > > > > > Cheney
> > > > > > > before they issue pardons. But if that fails, I urge you to 
> > > > > > > impeach
> > > > > > > George Bush and Dick Cheney afterwards for issuing pardons that
> > > > > > > constitute obstruction of justice and abuse of power.
>
> > > > > > > A post-inaugural impeachment would prohibit those impeached from 
> > > > > > > ever
> > > > > > > holding federal office, either elected or appointed. Arguably,
> > > > > > > impeachment would also nullify pre-impeachment pardons and permit
> > > > > > > prosecutions. Finally, impeachment would tell future Presidents 
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > cannot abuse their pardon power to put themselves above the law.
>
> > > > > > > In 1776, Thomas Paine famously wrote, "in America, the law is 
> > > > > > > King."
> > > > > > > Congress must not allow a President to commit crimes with 
> > > > > > > impunity, or
> > > > > > > it makes the President a dictator - or a King.
>
> > > > > > > Peace,
> > > > > > > Doc
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 13, 7:58 pm, Jim Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Since Obama abdicated honesty by claiming to be the tax slasher 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > defender of the universe apparently he, “and his ilk” are 
> > > > > > > > attempting
> > > > > > > > to double down; gut shoot the inside straight and blanket 
> > > > > > > > themselves
> > > > > > > > in constitutional credence. Honestly, this takes more cajones 
> > > > > > > > than an
> > > > > > > > elephant about to mount Rosie O’Donnell. Gee, even that picture 
> > > > > > > > makes
> > > > > > > > me somewhat ill.
>
> > > > > > > > For those of us paying attention to the Obama instead of gushing
> > > > > > > > homage we’ve noticed a call from the chosen one and his 
> > > > > > > > supporters to
> > > > > > > > a return to the constitution and those founding principals 
> > > > > > > > abiding
> > > > > > > > within the text. To the huddled masses chanting, “yes we can” 
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > communal soliloquy might fly yet, for we in the top ten percent,
> > > > > > > > firing over 90% of neurons along our synapsetic highway this is 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > epitome of lipstick on a pig.
>
> > > > > > > > Conservatives read our constitution much as liberals read a 
> > > > > > > > wine list
> > > > > > > > with pinky finger outstretched. We know it, we get it and we are
> > > > > > > > consumed by it. We believe it to be sacrosanct and 
> > > > > > > > unassailable. To
> > > > > > > > we, the people, it is an inspired document of divine genesis. 
> > > > > > > > For
> > > > > > > > liberals it is merely two ply on a scroll.
>
> > > > > > > > We have witnessed testimony, wherein posited profundities 
> > > > > > > > postulated
> > > > > > > > that his holiest Barack conjoined with the ACLU, will end the
> > > > > > > > transgression of Bush II and restore constitutionality to these 
> > > > > > > > amber
> > > > > > > > waves of grain upon which God shed his grace. Oh really?
>
> > > > > > > > The ACLU was founded by a Communist, with communist ideals, 
> > > > > > > > communist
> > > > > > > > goals, and they continue to impose a Communist like agenda on 
> > > > > > > > America
> > > > > > > > daily. The founder of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin stated clearly… 
> > > > > > > > “My
> > > > > > > > chief aversion is the system of greed, private profit, 
> > > > > > > > privilege and
> > > > > > > > violence which makes up the control of the world today, and 
> > > > > > > > which has
> > > > > > > > brought it to the tragic crisis of unprecedented hunger and
> > > > > > > > unemployment Therefore, I am for Socialism, disarmament and
> > > > > > > > ultimately, for the abolishing of the State itself, I seek the 
> > > > > > > > social
> > > > > > > > ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class 
> > > > > > > > and sole
> > > > > > > > control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.”
> > > > > > > > This revelation on its face would be, “in all intellectual 
> > > > > > > > circles”
> > > > > > > > game, set and match. Yet, draw near and prepare to be dazzled 
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > this soon to be award winning composition, for in this 
> > > > > > > > endeavor, with
> > > > > > > > talent on loan from Rush, I draw inspiration from the almighty 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > have only just begun.
> > > > > > > > Federal Judge Phyllis Hamilton, “a Clinton appointee” recently 
> > > > > > > > upheld
> > > > > > > > a ruling requiring seventh-grade students to pretend they're 
> > > > > > > > Muslims,
> > > > > > > > wear Islamic garb, memorize verses from the Quran, pray to 
> > > > > > > > Allah and
> > > > > > > > even to play "jihad games" in California public schools.(WND)
>
> > > > > > > > The ACLU has refused to comment on the ruling except to say 
> > > > > > > > they find,
> > > > > > > > “nothing actionable” in the ruling. Translation: the ACLU 
> > > > > > > > doesn’t have
> > > > > > > > a problem with it. If California public schools were requiring
> > > > > > > > students to memorize Bible verses the ACLU would have lawyers 
> > > > > > > > kicking
> > > > > > > > down the school doors and would be all over local school boards 
> > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > Rosie O’Donnell on a baked ham. You just know they would.
>
> > > > > > > > In 1989 the ACLU began a crusade to remove the Mount Soledad 
> > > > > > > > Cross
> > > > > > > > located in the center of a Korean War Memorial in San Diego,
> > > > > > > > California. The Cross was erected in 1954. While continuing a 
> > > > > > > > battle
> > > > > > > > to have the Cross removed they have defended Muslims who have
> > > > > > > > demanded, “Foot Basins” in airports, football stadiums and other
> > > > > > > > public places. Foot Basins are used by Muslims in preparation 
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > prayer. "Why are we constructing places of worship for them 
> > > > > > > > inside our
> > > > > > > > airports?" said an airport official who requested anonymity. 
> > > > > > > > "Why are
> > > > > > > > we catering to their rituals?
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to