d.b. I would have no reason or chance to. I've already explained I'm not a lawyer. Did you read and comprehend the post as I suggested? I was not the one claiming that lawyers in St. Louis, or anyone else in the U.S. were practicing Sharia Law in U.S. court rooms. That little stunt was pulled by your pal Gaar. I've noticed neither you nor Gaar has addressed that particular post.
Apparantly you did NOT scroll up and read my post to Gaar timed in at 11:02pm last night. Did I not openly state in that post any lawyer defending a client in a U.S. court on based on Sharia law would almost certainly be tossed out on his ear, at the very least ignored? Yes or no? Now, how have I been "defending honor-killings and/or Sharia Law"? On Nov 16, 12:22 am, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 16, 12:58 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm NOT repeating the obvious. to the oblivious. > > Not a bad line, just don't try it in court. > > Meanwhile, you fail to see the nuance in neon, the Sharia tactic. And > you're not alone, the FBI just filed as a friend to Sharia law - which > states that any lie or deception is applicable to Infidel court. > > Mimicking a clod, you look for literal translations under "Sharia". > Now, who in the right legal mind would openly advertise "Sharia > lawyer" in America? No one, except CAIR and the ACLU - by implication. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
