In the nineteenth century there was a movement to establish a  meat
industry in the area around Nome Alaska. It was founded by a Russian/
Inuit woman, who brought them to Alaska, and established an incredible
industry. Unfortunately after she died, the disposition of her estate
could not be settled, the reindeer went wild, then died, and that was
the end. Range fed reindeer, like range fed cattle carry much less
fat, and in theory fewer contaminants. I say in theory, because the
North is not immune to the pollutants of the south, far from it. And
an environmental disaster has long lasting implications in the north,
partly because of the time it takes for  the reset.  The caribou herd
is still there as a migratory wild species. This would impose a threat
on the reindeer, or vice versa, If the USDA  does its job that would
substantially slow the entire process.  By the way Navy, moose caught
in this area (SE Ontario, ) have warnings not to eat the liver,
because of heavy metal contamination. That alone should give some
pause, is beef liver safe? or is it at safe levels only because the
steer was killed at a relatively young age.
Then of course just how does that cover for the effects of genetics. A
good health care system can't just skim off the cream of customers,
those with chronic ailments are also in need of affordable treatment.

On Dec 9, 10:53 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not gonna happen ...your stuck with what you hve wrought.
>
> On Dec 9, 8:49 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ma'am ! please refer back to my comments on starting a new thread .
>
> > On Dec 9, 10:45 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > You see what you want. And where Palin is concerned its never going to
> > > be good  enoughfor you. Thats what I see. Blind stubborness is never a
> > > good thing. Just as blind following isn't never a good thing.
>
> > > On Dec 9, 8:35 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > no ma'am in time perhaps you will see . i already have !
>
> > > > On Dec 9, 10:20 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > In time I guess we'll see.
>
> > > > > On Dec 9, 8:15 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > sorry ma'am that is not how it sounds to me !
> > > > > > [Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an effort to repeal
> > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory process that 
> > > > > > requires
> > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state approval before
> > > > > > offering
> > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence that repealing 
> > > > > > CON
> > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed that loosening
> > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger market to
> > > > > > provide health care.”
> > > > > > Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin proposed increasing
> > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level to cover
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for more children to 
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the coverage,” Palin
> > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed such an
> > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new commissioners”
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to affordable
> > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform possible. Let’s
> > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which have yet to be
> > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal. ]
>
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:07 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Sounds like she's trying to do good by her state. She is mocing
> > > > > > > forward with finding a way to help insure more of them. Good for 
> > > > > > > her!
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:03 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/05/palin-health-plan/
> > > > > > > > At best, Palin’s proposals are small steps to a larger reform 
> > > > > > > > effort.
> > > > > > > > At worst they’re a wholly inadequate set of ‘pilot programs’ 
> > > > > > > > designed
> > > > > > > > to bolster Palin’s health care credentials without 
> > > > > > > > accomplishing much
> > > > > > > > at all.
>
> > > > > > > > With efforts like these, who needs access to care?:
> > > > > > > > Outdoor activity is not a “silver bullet” to increasing health
> > > > > > > > outcomes, Palin confessed. Other “fiscally responsible” 
> > > > > > > > approaches
> > > > > > > > must be considered:
>
> > > > > > > > - Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an effort to 
> > > > > > > > repeal
> > > > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory process that 
> > > > > > > > requires
> > > > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state approval before 
> > > > > > > > offering
> > > > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence that 
> > > > > > > > repealing CON
> > > > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed that 
> > > > > > > > loosening
> > > > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger market to
> > > > > > > > provide health care.”
>
> > > > > > > > - Purchasing insurance across state lines: In a throw-back to 
> > > > > > > > Sen.
> > > > > > > > John McCain’s (R-AZ) health care plan, Palin promised to 
> > > > > > > > “support
> > > > > > > > efforts on a national level for allowance of residents in one 
> > > > > > > > state to
> > > > > > > > look for insurance in other states, again all in the name of
> > > > > > > > competition, resulting, ideally, in more affordability, in 
> > > > > > > > addition to
> > > > > > > > supporting other national initiatives that newly election
> > > > > > > > administration coming into office can provide opportunity for.”
>
> > > > > > > > - Web-MD Alaska: Called, ‘Live Well Alaska,’ this website “pulls
> > > > > > > > together all the best advises for healthy eating and exercise 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > quitting smoking and it also incentivizes healthy life styles 
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > Alaskan stories and health challenges..” “Alaskans are 
> > > > > > > > unfortunately
> > > > > > > > becoming dangerously unhealthy due to poor diet or little or no
> > > > > > > > exercise…each of us must take personal responsibility for our 
> > > > > > > > level of
> > > > > > > > health, those things we can control, and not look to government 
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > make us healthy…’Live Well Alaska’ will help.”
>
> > > > > > > > - Alaska Health Care Commission: “The purpose of this is to 
> > > > > > > > provide
> > > > > > > > recommendations for and foster developments of the state wide 
> > > > > > > > plan to
> > > > > > > > address the quality, accessibility, and availability, of health 
> > > > > > > > care
> > > > > > > > here in Alaska and this is the result of our Health Care 
> > > > > > > > Council’s
> > > > > > > > recommendations to do so.”
>
> > > > > > > > - Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin proposed 
> > > > > > > > increasing
> > > > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level to 
> > > > > > > > cover an
> > > > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for more children 
> > > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the coverage,” Palin
> > > > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed such an
> > > > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new 
> > > > > > > > commissioners” with
> > > > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to affordable
> > > > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform possible. 
> > > > > > > > Let’s
> > > > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which have yet 
> > > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal.
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 9:29 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Bush cut the budget to both the FDA and USDA including the 
> > > > > > > > > inspectors.
> > > > > > > > > He and the Republican congress also eliminated the country of 
> > > > > > > > > origin
> > > > > > > > > labels required on food. He has done everything possible to 
> > > > > > > > > protect
> > > > > > > > > his corporate buddies. Of course it backfires like all his 
> > > > > > > > > harebrained
> > > > > > > > > schemes did. Topps out of business over the beef recalls and 
> > > > > > > > > 25
> > > > > > > > > deaths. Dogs and cats dead from tainted food from China. 
> > > > > > > > > Excessive
> > > > > > > > > amounts of lead on imported toys because we wanted cheaper 
> > > > > > > > > and cheaper
> > > > > > > > > products. Top dollar medicines that are only minimally 
> > > > > > > > > effective if
> > > > > > > > > not deadly. Corporate bottom lines got fatter while Bush' 
> > > > > > > > > constituents
> > > > > > > > > died. Funny how the American's cried when Japan halted 
> > > > > > > > > imports of
> > > > > > > > > American beef. They obviously don't trust our food. I live 
> > > > > > > > > here and I
> > > > > > > > > don't trust it. That probably explains why conservatives pray 
> > > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > every 
> > > > > > > > > mealhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080217171845AACOE76
> > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 9:02 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > i like the idea of people exercising and eating healthy 
> > > > > > > > > > foods . and
> > > > > > > > > > isn't it a tragedy that we can't trust the foods we buy 
> > > > > > > > > > over the
> > > > > > > > > > counter because of the cuts in funding by the republicans 
> > > > > > > > > > and the lack
> > > > > > > > > > of over sight by the bush FDA
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 4:52 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Palin's Health Plan Focuses on 'Outdoor Activities' and 
> > > > > > > > > > > Consumption
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > 'Wild 
> > > > > > > > > > > Game'http://www.alternet.org/blogs/healthwellness/110446/
> > > > > > > > > > > A moose a day keeps the doctor away.
> > > > > > > > > > > After inexplicably describing the September bailout of 
> > > > > > > > > > > Wall Street as
> > > > > > > > > > > a package that would "help those who are concerned about 
> > > > > > > > > > > health care
> > > > > > > > > > > reform," Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) yesterday unveiled a 
> > > > > > > > > > > patchwork of
> > > > > > > > > > > health care proposals to "improve Alaska's health and 
> > > > > > > > > > > education."
> > > > > > > > > > > Palin's initiatives include a greater emphasis on outdoor 
> > > > > > > > > > > activity:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > With amazing outdoor activities in fresh clean air and 
> > > > > > > > > > > consumption of
> > > > > > > > > > > healthy clean protein in the form of wild game and 
> > > > > > > > > > > Alaska's sea food.
> > > > > > > > > > > We got berries, we've got Alaskan-grown produce and those 
> > > > > > > > > > > things need
> > > > > > > > > > > to be promoted.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Listen here:- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to