Very cool. We have deer here that walk down our street towards the
greenbelt. I'd love to see some moose or reindeer doing that!

On Dec 9, 9:40 am, margareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have mule deer here. In this province they are currently so
> numerous that hundreds are killed on the highways. The medical info.
> on moose, comes with hunting information. Bull moose are also
> notorious for attacking small cars,  When out of season, it is
> necessary to be wary of them when driving at night. Under those
> circumstances, the meat usually does not  offset the cost of the car
> repairs. With so many out of work, many families will be eating wild
> meat this winter.
> I saw a film about the 'ghost reindeer' of the Nome area, and was
> intrigued. If you check with the National Geographic, or any
> encyclopaedia, you would find that caribou, and reindeer are native
> North American and North Eurasian subspecies. that feed on lichens
> etc. through ou the northern regions, and at one time as far south as
> Maine. Of course many lawns are now being ornamented with the red
> nosed version these days.
>
> On Dec 9, 11:23 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Then of course just how does that cover for the effects of genetics.
> > A
> > good health care system can't just skim off the cream of customers,
> > those with chronic ailments are also in need of affordable treatment.
> > *********************
> > I agree...and I think Palin will address those needs with her new
> > commission.
> > BTW...very interesting tidbit of info you gave. How do you come to
> > know so much about the reindeer and moose?
>
> > On Dec 9, 9:18 am, margareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > In the nineteenth century there was a movement to establish a  meat
> > > industry in the area around Nome Alaska. It was founded by a Russian/
> > > Inuit woman, who brought them to Alaska, and established an incredible
> > > industry. Unfortunately after she died, the disposition of her estate
> > > could not be settled, the reindeer went wild, then died, and that was
> > > the end. Range fed reindeer, like range fed cattle carry much less
> > > fat, and in theory fewer contaminants. I say in theory, because the
> > > North is not immune to the pollutants of the south, far from it. And
> > > an environmental disaster has long lasting implications in the north,
> > > partly because of the time it takes for  the reset.  The caribou herd
> > > is still there as a migratory wild species. This would impose a threat
> > > on the reindeer, or vice versa, If the USDA  does its job that would
> > > substantially slow the entire process.  By the way Navy, moose caught
> > > in this area (SE Ontario, ) have warnings not to eat the liver,
> > > because of heavy metal contamination. That alone should give some
> > > pause, is beef liver safe? or is it at safe levels only because the
> > > steer was killed at a relatively young age.
> > > Then of course just how does that cover for the effects of genetics. A
> > > good health care system can't just skim off the cream of customers,
> > > those with chronic ailments are also in need of affordable treatment.
>
> > > On Dec 9, 10:53 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Not gonna happen ...your stuck with what you hve wrought.
>
> > > > On Dec 9, 8:49 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > ma'am ! please refer back to my comments on starting a new thread .
>
> > > > > On Dec 9, 10:45 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You see what you want. And where Palin is concerned its never going 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > be good  enoughfor you. Thats what I see. Blind stubborness is 
> > > > > > never a
> > > > > > good thing. Just as blind following isn't never a good thing.
>
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:35 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > no ma'am in time perhaps you will see . i already have !
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:20 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > In time I guess we'll see.
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:15 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > sorry ma'am that is not how it sounds to me !
> > > > > > > > > [Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an effort to 
> > > > > > > > > repeal
> > > > > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory process that 
> > > > > > > > > requires
> > > > > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state approval before
> > > > > > > > > offering
> > > > > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence that 
> > > > > > > > > repealing CON
> > > > > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed that 
> > > > > > > > > loosening
> > > > > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger market 
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > provide health care.”
> > > > > > > > > Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin proposed 
> > > > > > > > > increasing
> > > > > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level to 
> > > > > > > > > cover
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for more 
> > > > > > > > > children to be
> > > > > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the coverage,” Palin
> > > > > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed such an
> > > > > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new 
> > > > > > > > > commissioners”
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to affordable
> > > > > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform 
> > > > > > > > > possible. Let’s
> > > > > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which have 
> > > > > > > > > yet to be
> > > > > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal. ]
>
> > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:07 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Sounds like she's trying to do good by her state. She is 
> > > > > > > > > > mocing
> > > > > > > > > > forward with finding a way to help insure more of them. 
> > > > > > > > > > Good for her!
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:03 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/05/palin-health-plan/
> > > > > > > > > > > At best, Palin’s proposals are small steps to a larger 
> > > > > > > > > > > reform effort.
> > > > > > > > > > > At worst they’re a wholly inadequate set of ‘pilot 
> > > > > > > > > > > programs’ designed
> > > > > > > > > > > to bolster Palin’s health care credentials without 
> > > > > > > > > > > accomplishing much
> > > > > > > > > > > at all.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > With efforts like these, who needs access to care?:
> > > > > > > > > > > Outdoor activity is not a “silver bullet” to increasing 
> > > > > > > > > > > health
> > > > > > > > > > > outcomes, Palin confessed. Other “fiscally responsible” 
> > > > > > > > > > > approaches
> > > > > > > > > > > must be considered:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an 
> > > > > > > > > > > effort to repeal
> > > > > > > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory process 
> > > > > > > > > > > that requires
> > > > > > > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state approval 
> > > > > > > > > > > before offering
> > > > > > > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence that 
> > > > > > > > > > > repealing CON
> > > > > > > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed that 
> > > > > > > > > > > loosening
> > > > > > > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger 
> > > > > > > > > > > market to
> > > > > > > > > > > provide health care.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Purchasing insurance across state lines: In a 
> > > > > > > > > > > throw-back to Sen.
> > > > > > > > > > > John McCain’s (R-AZ) health care plan, Palin promised to 
> > > > > > > > > > > “support
> > > > > > > > > > > efforts on a national level for allowance of residents in 
> > > > > > > > > > > one state to
> > > > > > > > > > > look for insurance in other states, again all in the name 
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > competition, resulting, ideally, in more affordability, 
> > > > > > > > > > > in addition to
> > > > > > > > > > > supporting other national initiatives that newly election
> > > > > > > > > > > administration coming into office can provide opportunity 
> > > > > > > > > > > for.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Web-MD Alaska: Called, ‘Live Well Alaska,’ this website 
> > > > > > > > > > > “pulls
> > > > > > > > > > > together all the best advises for healthy eating and 
> > > > > > > > > > > exercise and
> > > > > > > > > > > quitting smoking and it also incentivizes healthy life 
> > > > > > > > > > > styles with
> > > > > > > > > > > Alaskan stories and health challenges..” “Alaskans are 
> > > > > > > > > > > unfortunately
> > > > > > > > > > > becoming dangerously unhealthy due to poor diet or little 
> > > > > > > > > > > or no
> > > > > > > > > > > exercise…each of us must take personal responsibility for 
> > > > > > > > > > > our level of
> > > > > > > > > > > health, those things we can control, and not look to 
> > > > > > > > > > > government to
> > > > > > > > > > > make us healthy…’Live Well Alaska’ will help.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Alaska Health Care Commission: “The purpose of this is 
> > > > > > > > > > > to provide
> > > > > > > > > > > recommendations for and foster developments of the state 
> > > > > > > > > > > wide plan to
> > > > > > > > > > > address the quality, accessibility, and availability, of 
> > > > > > > > > > > health care
> > > > > > > > > > > here in Alaska and this is the result of our Health Care 
> > > > > > > > > > > Council’s
> > > > > > > > > > > recommendations to do so.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin 
> > > > > > > > > > > proposed increasing
> > > > > > > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty 
> > > > > > > > > > > Level to cover an
> > > > > > > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for more 
> > > > > > > > > > > children to be
> > > > > > > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the coverage,” 
> > > > > > > > > > > Palin
> > > > > > > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed 
> > > > > > > > > > > such an
> > > > > > > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new 
> > > > > > > > > > > commissioners” with
> > > > > > > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to 
> > > > > > > > > > > affordable
> > > > > > > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform 
> > > > > > > > > > > possible. Let’s
> > > > > > > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which 
> > > > > > > > > > > have yet to be
> > > > > > > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 9:29 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bush cut the budget to both the FDA and USDA including 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the inspectors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > He and the Republican
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to