I am speaking on the subject you posted Palin and her health care plan
for her state. Whats the problem?

On Dec 9, 10:25 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ma'am you might wish to check with the board moderator . but i think
> there is a rule about changing the topic of a thread . and as i have
> said if you wish to post on another subject start a thread with that
> name . I am sure you would find someone who would respond to you !
>
> On Dec 9, 12:13 pm, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Tell you what Mikey. You stop your personal attacks on Palin and I'll
> > leave you be. But since you woun't do that no matter what...don't
> > expect me to adhere to your demands.
>
> > On Dec 9, 10:10 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > sorry ma'am ! but much like your advice on spelling and punctuation it
> > > is unwanted .  it would be nice if you could stick to the topic
> > > instead of launching into personal attacks .
>
> > > On Dec 9, 11:48 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Thats right Mikey. You get a gold star today!
>
> > > > On Dec 9, 9:20 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > ma'am ! as you can see from the title the topic of this thread is
> > > > > palin and healthcare .
>
> > > > > On Dec 9, 10:53 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Not gonna happen ...your stuck with what you hve wrought.
>
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:49 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > ma'am ! please refer back to my comments on starting a new thread 
> > > > > > > .
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:45 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > You see what you want. And where Palin is concerned its never 
> > > > > > > > going to
> > > > > > > > be good  enoughfor you. Thats what I see. Blind stubborness is 
> > > > > > > > never a
> > > > > > > > good thing. Just as blind following isn't never a good thing.
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:35 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > no ma'am in time perhaps you will see . i already have !
>
> > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:20 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > In time I guess we'll see.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:15 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > sorry ma'am that is not how it sounds to me !
> > > > > > > > > > > [Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an effort 
> > > > > > > > > > > to repeal
> > > > > > > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory process 
> > > > > > > > > > > that requires
> > > > > > > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state approval 
> > > > > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > > offering
> > > > > > > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence that 
> > > > > > > > > > > repealing CON
> > > > > > > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed that 
> > > > > > > > > > > loosening
> > > > > > > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger 
> > > > > > > > > > > market to
> > > > > > > > > > > provide health care.”
> > > > > > > > > > > Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin proposed 
> > > > > > > > > > > increasing
> > > > > > > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty 
> > > > > > > > > > > Level to cover
> > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for more 
> > > > > > > > > > > children to be
> > > > > > > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the coverage,” 
> > > > > > > > > > > Palin
> > > > > > > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed 
> > > > > > > > > > > such an
> > > > > > > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new 
> > > > > > > > > > > commissioners”
> > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to 
> > > > > > > > > > > affordable
> > > > > > > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform 
> > > > > > > > > > > possible. Let’s
> > > > > > > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which 
> > > > > > > > > > > have yet to be
> > > > > > > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal. ]
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 10:07 am, NavyBrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like she's trying to do good by her state. She 
> > > > > > > > > > > > is mocing
> > > > > > > > > > > > forward with finding a way to help insure more of them. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Good for her!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 8:03 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/05/palin-health-plan/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > At best, Palin’s proposals are small steps to a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > larger reform effort.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > At worst they’re a wholly inadequate set of ‘pilot 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > programs’ designed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to bolster Palin’s health care credentials without 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > accomplishing much
> > > > > > > > > > > > > at all.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > With efforts like these, who needs access to care?:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Outdoor activity is not a “silver bullet” to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > increasing health
> > > > > > > > > > > > > outcomes, Palin confessed. Other “fiscally 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > responsible” approaches
> > > > > > > > > > > > > must be considered:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Greater deregulation: Palin had previously led an 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > effort to repeal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Certificate of Need laws, (CON) — “a regulatory 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > process that requires
> > > > > > > > > > > > > certain health care providers to obtain state 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > approval before offering
> > > > > > > > > > > > > certain new or expanded service.” Despite evidence 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that repealing CON
> > > > > > > > > > > > > laws would drive-up health care costs, Palin claimed 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that loosening
> > > > > > > > > > > > > CON laws would “invite more competition in our larger 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > market to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > provide health care.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Purchasing insurance across state lines: In a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > throw-back to Sen.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > John McCain’s (R-AZ) health care plan, Palin promised 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to “support
> > > > > > > > > > > > > efforts on a national level for allowance of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > residents in one state to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > look for insurance in other states, again all in the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > name of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > competition, resulting, ideally, in more 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > affordability, in addition to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > supporting other national initiatives that newly 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > election
> > > > > > > > > > > > > administration coming into office can provide 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > opportunity for.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Web-MD Alaska: Called, ‘Live Well Alaska,’ this 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > website “pulls
> > > > > > > > > > > > > together all the best advises for healthy eating and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > exercise and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > quitting smoking and it also incentivizes healthy 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > life styles with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Alaskan stories and health challenges..” “Alaskans 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are unfortunately
> > > > > > > > > > > > > becoming dangerously unhealthy due to poor diet or 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > little or no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > exercise…each of us must take personal responsibility 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for our level of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > health, those things we can control, and not look to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > government to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > make us healthy…’Live Well Alaska’ will help.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Alaska Health Care Commission: “The purpose of this 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is to provide
> > > > > > > > > > > > > recommendations for and foster developments of the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > state wide plan to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > address the quality, accessibility, and availability, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of health care
> > > > > > > > > > > > > here in Alaska and this is the result of our Health 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Care Council’s
> > > > > > > > > > > > > recommendations to do so.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Boost funding to Denali Kid Care (SCHIP): Palin 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > proposed increasing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > eligibility from 175% to 200% of the Federal Poverty 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Level to cover an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > additional 1,300 kids. “It’s going to be good for 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > more children to be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on the rolls to have the opportunity for the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > coverage,” Palin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > announced. When questioned why she previously opposed 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > such an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > expansion, Palin explained that she appointed “new 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > commissioners” with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a “new vision.”
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What’s missing from Palin’s plan is broad access to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > affordable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > coverage or cost-containment measures to make reform 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > possible. Let’s
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hope her Health Care Commission, the members of which 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have yet to be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > appointed, offers a more comprehensive proposal.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 9:29 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bush cut the budget to both the FDA and USDA 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > including the inspectors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He and the Republican congress also eliminated the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > country of origin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > labels required on food. He has done everything 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible to protect
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > his corporate buddies. Of course it backfires like 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all his harebrained
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > schemes did. Topps out of business over the beef 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recalls and 25
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > deaths. Dogs and cats dead from tainted food from 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > China. Excessive
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > amounts of lead on imported toys because we wanted 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheaper and cheaper
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > products. Top dollar medicines that are only 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > minimally effective if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not deadly. Corporate bottom lines got fatter while 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bush' constituents
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > died. Funny how the American's cried when Japan 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > halted imports of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > American beef. They obviously don't trust our food. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I live here and I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't trust it. That probably explains why 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > conservatives pray before
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > every 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mealhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080217171845AACOE76
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9, 9:02 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i like the idea of people exercising and eating 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > healthy foods . and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > isn't it a tragedy that we can't trust the foods 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we buy over the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counter because of the cuts in funding by the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > republicans and the lack
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to