what part of she admitted it don't you understand ? an if you are still having trouble excepting it look on google . On Dec 14, 8:39 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > Tell me where I'm wrong. Tell me where in the article above it shows > evidence that Palin used her personal email accounts for government > business. > > If I'm wrong, why have no charges been filed? If I'm wrong why was it > written at motherjones; "her emails--if the legal reviewers do not > censor them for political purposes--might still make interesting, and > perhaps important, reading.". If in fact there was evidence they would > not have written their attack in terms of "might still" or "and > perhaps important"? > > It is you who will not see. You WANT Palin to be guilty so you see > guilt where none currently exists. > > On Dec 14, 3:33 am, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > well i guess your answer proves " there are non so blind as those who > > will not see ? " > > > On Dec 13, 4:02 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mike, > > > > This doesn't prove a thing. Read it and pay attention to what is being > > > said. I take three things away from this; > > > > (1) "...the suit alleges.". > > > > So we have a suit filed by Andrée McLeod that contends Palin did this. > > > This proves nothing. > > > > (2) "In one notable e-mail, a Palin aide apologized for discussing > > > state business on a public account. "Whoops!" Palin aide Frank Bailey > > > wrote, after addressing an e-mail to the governor's official state > > > address. "Frank, this is not the Governor's personal account," a > > > secretary reminded him. ". > > > > So the only example cited in this article is an email that an aide, > > > Frank Bailey, wrote. There is still no evidence that Palin broke the > > > law. > > > > (3) "A spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign has acknowledged the > > > use of private accounts. "As a champion of government accountability > > > and transparency, Governor Palin was exercising an abundance of > > > caution to ensure that all state and personal business matters were > > > being kept separate,"". > > > > So Palin has acknowledged using private email accounts, which she MUST > > > do, because by law she can't use her official email account for > > > personal emails. Note that this is NOT acknowledging the use of > > > private email accounts for government business. > > > > Somehow I suspect if these charges were against Obama you would be > > > correctly interpreting what has been written, but because this is > > > against Palin you see what you want to see. > > > > On Dec 13, 3:27 pm, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Sarah Palin > > > > Palin Sued for Private E-Mails About State Business > > > > By Matthew Mosk > > > > ANCHORAGE -- In a lawsuit filed in Alaska Superior Court, a Republican > > > > activist seeks to force Gov. Sarah Palin to produce copies of official > > > > correspondence she sent and received on private e-mail accounts. > > > > > Andrée McLeod filed the suit Wednesday and publicized it in a news > > > > release today. "Rather than using her state e-mail account, throughout > > > > her two-year tenure as Governor of Alaska, defendant Sarah Palin, as a > > > > matter of routine, has used, and, on information and belief, continues > > > > to use, (at least) two private e-mail accounts... to conduct official > > > > business of the State of Alaska," the suit alleges. > > > > > The suit is the latest front in a battle McLeod is waging over Palin's > > > > e-mail. In June, she filed an open-records request and received four > > > > boxes of redacted e-mails. But more than 1,100 others were withheld, > > > > an action Palin justified by claiming executive privilege. McLeod > > > > appealed that claim last month before going to court last week. > > > > > McLeod has questioned whether Palin was using private e-mail accounts > > > > to conduct state business in a manner that would skirt open-records > > > > laws. In one notable e-mail, a Palin aide apologized for discussing > > > > state business on a public account. "Whoops!" Palin aide Frank Bailey > > > > wrote, after addressing an e-mail to the governor's official state > > > > address. "Frank, this is not the Governor's personal account," a > > > > secretary reminded him. > > > > > A spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign has acknowledged the use > > > > of private accounts. "As a champion of government accountability and > > > > transparency, Governor Palin was exercising an abundance of caution to > > > > ensure that all state and personal business matters were being kept > > > > separate," Meghan Stapleton said recently. "Governor Palin is > > > > committed to serving with the highest regard toward ethics." > > > > > But McLeod said she believes the Palin administration fostered a > > > > "culture of corruption" in Alaska where neither she nor her top aides > > > > were accountable to rules of transparency in government. > > > > > "The extent of the use of these private e-mail accounts demonstrates > > > > the extent of deception that the governor is operating under," McLeod > > > > said in an interview today. "The process is corrupt. The overall > > > > question now becomes, how did it become so broken that nobody could > > > > tell her, 'Don't do that.' That's why I'm going to the courts." > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:20 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Come back when I find anything you made up? Geez, that wasn't > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > You made up ==> 'Palin used private email accounts for government > > > > > business'. Well, you didn't make it up, but you have repeated it. > > > > > > You've been given ample opportunity to prove she did it. As expected, > > > > > you did not provide any links. Lots of cheap talk but you can't ever > > > > > seem to prove a damn thing. > > > > > > On Dec 13, 2:23 pm, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > come on back when you can find anything i made up sparky ! > > > > > > mean while like it or not palin used private emails for government > > > > > > business . > > > > > > On Dec 13, 2:05 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > Considering your penchant for making stuff up, I'm not counting > > > > > > > on you > > > > > > > using that information any time soon. > > > > > > > > As for there being "no question that palin used yahoo and other > > > > > > > email > > > > > > > accounts for government emails".. perhaps you have no question, > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > then again, you'll accept any story as long as it's anti-Palin, > > > > > > > so I'm > > > > > > > not surprised. > > > > > > > > Fact is, I did Google this and it came up empty. I've searched for > > > > > > > quotes, I've searched for charges, I've searched for copies of > > > > > > > emails > > > > > > > that would prove this and all I can find are people such as you > > > > > > > making > > > > > > > the accusation but never substantiating it. I guess you guys > > > > > > > think if > > > > > > > you repeat the lie often enough it will make it true. > > > > > > > > You might want to try employing some common sense. Do you really > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > motherjones would have written "her emails--if the legal > > > > > > > reviewers do > > > > > > > not censor them for political purposes--might still make > > > > > > > interesting, > > > > > > > and perhaps important, reading." if evidence existed? And how can > > > > > > > legal reviewers censor them if they're already out there? Duh! > > > > > > > > I don't suppose you're going to actually prove Palin admitted to > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > by providing a link, are you? ...I didn't think so. > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:16 am, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > wow! gee thanks for sharing that information with me it might > > > > > > > > come in > > > > > > > > handy some day . now let me share something with you there is no > > > > > > > > question that palin used yahoo and other email accounts for > > > > > > > > government > > > > > > > > emails she has admitted doing so during the campaign the only > > > > > > > > question > > > > > > > > is what was she trying to hide when she did so . if you really > > > > > > > > want > > > > > > > > her exact quote when she admitted her actions you might try > > > > > > > > googling > > > > > > > > it . > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:14 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > > > You probably know this but I'll tell you anyway; when you are > > > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > an article such as this, words contained within quotations > > > > > > > > > can be > > > > > > > > > attributed to an identified source. Words not in quotes > > > > > > > > > belong to the > > > > > > > > > author. As you can see from this passage there are no quotes. > > > > > > > > > That > > > > > > > > > means this is the author's opinion and nothing more. I tried > > > > > > > > > to help > > > > > > > > > you out by pointing out there were no quotes but you chose to > > > > > > > > > ignore > > > > > > > > > me. See if I try to help you again. At least I know you're > > > > > > > > > not a legal > > > > > > > > > scholar as you clearly have no idea what constitutes > > > > > > > > > 'evidence'. > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 3:57 pm, mike 532 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The problem: Palin had used at least two nonofficial email > > > > > > > > > > accounts > > > > > > > > > > (such as a Yahoo account) to conduct her state business. > > > > > > > > > > Given that > > > > > > > > > > the governor's office did not have access to those > > > > > > > > > > accounts, its > > > > > > > > > > information specialists had concluded that the only way to > > > > > > > > > > gather all > > > > > > > > > > her emails would be to search the state email accounts for > > > > > > > > > > about 70 > > > > > > > > > > people who worked within the executive offices of the > > > > > > > > > > governor and > > > > > > > > > > look for emails to and from Palin's nonofficial email > > > > > > > > > > accounts. > > > > > > > > > > Palin's office estimated it would cost almost a thousand > > > > > > > > > > dollars for > > > > > > > > > > each search of these 70 or so official accounts. > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 3:28 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > Please point out a QUOTE in this article from Palin or > > > > > > > > > > > her office that > > > > > > > > > > > confirms she used private email accounts for official > > > > > > > > > > > state business? > > > > > > > > > > > I'll help you.. there > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
