frank if you can prove Palin did not use private email accounts for government business after she admitted that had done so please go ahead and do it .
On Dec 14, 6:23 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark, > > It's still entertaining. Time and again Mike makes a claim, to which > it is easily proven wrong, and rather than address the facts he > repeats his same line. > > It's be proven by his very own reference that an unborn fetus is > alive. Not only can he not mount an argument against the definition > but he chids you for questioning a later definition, which is clearly > philosophical. > > Here it's been proven that Palin has not admitted to using a personal > email account for government business and again, he can't defend it, > so he repeats the same old line. All I've asked for is a quote or a > link to something that proves the evidence exists and Mike can't do > it. Milke twists things so badly that he could actually argue that > frogs can fly because they eat flies. > > What I'd really like to see is someone, such as Hollywood, whom I > believe Mike does respect, to jump in here and add his two cents. At > least Hollywood takes the time to defend his positions. > > On Dec 14, 2:03 pm, mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > frank, arguing is murky is a tee total waste of your time. his little > > mind functions in a reality unknown to sane people. save your breath. > > > On Dec 14, 1:05 pm, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > sorry frank as much as you would like it not to be true palin admitted > > > using private emails for government business ! > > > > On Dec 14, 10:52 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > None. Let's look at what was said; > > > > > "A spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign has acknowledged the > > > > use of private accounts." > > > > > She uses personal email accounts. Everyone does. Does it say she > > > > acknowledged using them for government business? No.. it's YOU who > > > > wants to infer this from the statement. > > > > > "As a champion of government accountability > > > > and transparency, Governor Palin was exercising an abundance of > > > > caution to ensure that all state and personal business matters were > > > > being kept separate," > > > > > Here she is explicitly stating the importance of separating matters of > > > > personal business from state. Coming immediately following the > > > > acknowledgement that she uses personal email accounts, this HAS to > > > > mean she uses personal email accounts for matters of personal > > > > business, and her official email accounts for matters pertaining to > > > > the state. I'm pretty certain she wouldn't admit to using a personal > > > > account for government business and immediately follow that up by > > > > stating how she's used an abundance of caution to ensure she didn't do > > > > this. Come on Mike, use your head. > > > > > She admitted using personal email accounts as does most everyone else > > > > these days. She does not admit using personal email accounts for > > > > government business? Stop telling me to Google this.. I have, > > > > extensively, and I find NO EVIDENCE of this. All I'm seeing is more > > > > evidence of you being incapable of simple reading comprehension. > > > > > On Dec 14, 8:49 am, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > what part of she admitted it don't you understand ? > > > > > an if you are still having trouble excepting it look on google . > > > > > On Dec 14, 8:39 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > Tell me where I'm wrong. Tell me where in the article above it shows > > > > > > evidence that Palin used her personal email accounts for government > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > If I'm wrong, why have no charges been filed? If I'm wrong why was > > > > > > it > > > > > > written at motherjones; "her emails--if the legal reviewers do not > > > > > > censor them for political purposes--might still make interesting, > > > > > > and > > > > > > perhaps important, reading.". If in fact there was evidence they > > > > > > would > > > > > > not have written their attack in terms of "might still" or "and > > > > > > perhaps important"? > > > > > > > It is you who will not see. You WANT Palin to be guilty so you see > > > > > > guilt where none currently exists. > > > > > > > On Dec 14, 3:33 am, Florida Cracker 532 <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > well i guess your answer proves " there are non so blind as > > > > > > > those who > > > > > > > will not see ? " > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 4:02 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > > This doesn't prove a thing. Read it and pay attention to what > > > > > > > > is being > > > > > > > > said. I take three things away from this; > > > > > > > > > (1) "...the suit alleges.". > > > > > > > > > So we have a suit filed by Andrée McLeod that contends Palin > > > > > > > > did this. > > > > > > > > This proves nothing. > > > > > > > > > (2) "In one notable e-mail, a Palin aide apologized for > > > > > > > > discussing > > > > > > > > state business on a public account. "Whoops!" Palin aide Frank > > > > > > > > Bailey > > > > > > > > wrote, after addressing an e-mail to the governor's official > > > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > address. "Frank, this is not the Governor's personal account," a > > > > > > > > secretary reminded him. ". > > > > > > > > > So the only example cited in this article is an email that an > > > > > > > > aide, > > > > > > > > Frank Bailey, wrote. There is still no evidence that Palin > > > > > > > > broke the > > > > > > > > law. > > > > > > > > > (3) "A spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign has > > > > > > > > acknowledged the > > > > > > > > use of private accounts. "As a champion of government > > > > > > > > accountability > > > > > > > > and transparency, Governor Palin was exercising an abundance of > > > > > > > > caution to ensure that all state and personal business matters > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > being kept separate,"". > > > > > > > > > So Palin has acknowledged using private email accounts, which > > > > > > > > she MUST > > > > > > > > do, because by law she can't use her official email account for > > > > > > > > personal emails. Note that this is NOT acknowledging the use of > > > > > > > > private email accounts for government business. > > > > > > > > > Somehow I suspect if these charges were against Obama you would > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > correctly interpreting what has been written, but because this > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > against Palin you see what you want to see. > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:27 pm, Florida Cracker 532 > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Palin > > > > > > > > > Palin Sued for Private E-Mails About State Business > > > > > > > > > By Matthew Mosk > > > > > > > > > ANCHORAGE -- In a lawsuit filed in Alaska Superior Court, a > > > > > > > > > Republican > > > > > > > > > activist seeks to force Gov. Sarah Palin to produce copies of > > > > > > > > > official > > > > > > > > > correspondence she sent and received on private e-mail > > > > > > > > > accounts. > > > > > > > > > > Andrée McLeod filed the suit Wednesday and publicized it in a > > > > > > > > > news > > > > > > > > > release today. "Rather than using her state e-mail account, > > > > > > > > > throughout > > > > > > > > > her two-year tenure as Governor of Alaska, defendant Sarah > > > > > > > > > Palin, as a > > > > > > > > > matter of routine, has used, and, on information and belief, > > > > > > > > > continues > > > > > > > > > to use, (at least) two private e-mail accounts... to conduct > > > > > > > > > official > > > > > > > > > business of the State of Alaska," the suit alleges. > > > > > > > > > > The suit is the latest front in a battle McLeod is waging > > > > > > > > > over Palin's > > > > > > > > > e-mail. In June, she filed an open-records request and > > > > > > > > > received four > > > > > > > > > boxes of redacted e-mails. But more than 1,100 others were > > > > > > > > > withheld, > > > > > > > > > an action Palin justified by claiming executive privilege. > > > > > > > > > McLeod > > > > > > > > > appealed that claim last month before going to court last > > > > > > > > > week. > > > > > > > > > > McLeod has questioned whether Palin was using private e-mail > > > > > > > > > accounts > > > > > > > > > to conduct state business in a manner that would skirt > > > > > > > > > open-records > > > > > > > > > laws. In one notable e-mail, a Palin aide apologized for > > > > > > > > > discussing > > > > > > > > > state business on a public account. "Whoops!" Palin aide > > > > > > > > > Frank Bailey > > > > > > > > > wrote, after addressing an e-mail to the governor's official > > > > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > > address. "Frank, this is not the Governor's personal > > > > > > > > > account," a > > > > > > > > > secretary reminded him. > > > > > > > > > > A spokeswoman for the McCain-Palin campaign has acknowledged > > > > > > > > > the use > > > > > > > > > of private accounts. "As a champion of government > > > > > > > > > accountability and > > > > > > > > > transparency, Governor Palin was exercising an abundance of > > > > > > > > > caution to > > > > > > > > > ensure that all state and personal business matters were > > > > > > > > > being kept > > > > > > > > > separate," Meghan Stapleton said recently. "Governor Palin is > > > > > > > > > committed to serving with the highest regard toward ethics." > > > > > > > > > > But McLeod said she believes the Palin administration > > > > > > > > > fostered a > > > > > > > > > "culture of corruption" in Alaska where neither she nor her > > > > > > > > > top aides > > > > > > > > > were accountable to rules of transparency in government. > > > > > > > > > > "The extent of the use of these private e-mail accounts > > > > > > > > > demonstrates > > > > > > > > > the extent of deception that the governor is operating > > > > > > > > > under," McLeod > > > > > > > > > said in an interview today. "The process is corrupt. The > > > > > > > > > overall > > > > > > > > > question now becomes, how did it become so broken that nobody > > > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > tell her, 'Don't do that.' That's why I'm going to the > > > > > > > > > courts." > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 3:20 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Come back when I find anything you made up? Geez, that > > > > > > > > > > wasn't > > > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > You made up ==> 'Palin used private email accounts for > > > > > > > > > > government > > > > > > > > > > business'. Well, you didn't make it up, but you have > > > > > > > > > > repeated it. > > > > > > > > > > > You've been given ample opportunity to prove she did it. As > > > > > > > > > > expected, > > > > > > > > > > you did not provide any links. Lots of cheap talk but you > > > > > > > > > > can't ever > > > > > > > > > > seem to prove a damn thing. > > > > > > > > > > > On > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
