you guys said experience didn't matter when you picked palin so we
took you at your word .

On Dec 29, 1:26 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Read the articles, she wants to be appointed now.  She can't wait and
> RUN for the office.  If an appointment is the only means to fill such
> a position, then by all means, appoint someone with EXPERIENCE, not
> just *deep political ties* and a family curse over their head.
>
> Where is all the outrage of lack of experience from the Dems on this
> one?
>
> On Dec 29, 10:53 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "I never implied it was *just the dems*, spare me the drama. "
>
> > "Why does Caroline Kennedy get a free pass from the Dems? "
>
> > It's not a free pass, it's the way things are done routinely.
>
> > *****************
>
> > "It is tacky to say the least for Kennedy to even announce she
> > is seeking appointment but states she will not run for office."
>
> > Where do you get that?
> > " Asked whether she would run for the office if Gov. David Paterson
> > doesn't appoint her, she replied: 
> > "Absolutely."http://www.progressiveinvolvement.com/progressive_involvement/2008/12...
>
> > On Dec 29, 10:46 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I never implied it was *just the dems*, spare me the drama.
>
> > > It is the law and to prevent appointment (monarchy style government),
> > > the law should be changed to allow elections in situtations such as
> > > this.  It is tacky to say the least for Kennedy to even announce she
> > > is seeking appointment but states she will not run for office.  Says
> > > much about her character, or should I say, lack of?
>
> > > Where is the outrage from the Dems about her lack of *experience* in
> > > politics?  Her *strong* political ties?  Which, btw, scare me to
> > > death...maybe it's the whole family curse thingy.  Her experience as a
> > > mother and community volunteer are two experiences she list and is
> > > being ignored by the dems.  Why is that?
>
> > > On Dec 29, 10:24 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > So are you proposing special elections for vacated seats?
> > > > I'm not sure I agree with appointments but right now there doesn't
> > > > seem to be a better way. But, it is the law, and it's not just Dems
> > > > that do it.
>
> > > > On Dec 29, 9:49 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > stab....not stap  Why use spell check, when we have you?  =D
>
> > > > > Doesn't matter if the seat is being vacated in the middle of a term or
> > > > > not, the law should be changed to prevent appointment.  Elected to a
> > > > > seat by the people should be the only way one should hold a public
> > > > > office.  Maybe one day American will see that and change from the
> > > > > monarchy ways of old.
>
> > > > > On Dec 29, 9:39 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Why not run for office and get ELECTED.  Why even ask for an
> > > > > > appointment to a seat, "
> > > > > > Because the seat is being vacated in th middle of a term, and there
> > > > > > is no election. The governor of the state has sole authority to
> > > > > > appoint a successor to the seat, who will hold the office until the
> > > > > > next election in 2010. This is the way it's done by both Republicans
> > > > > > and Democrats, by law.
>
> > > > > > What is a stap?
>
> > > > > > On Dec 29, 9:25 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Mornin' Wncs,
>
> > > > > > > I'll take a stap at that question for rigsy for $200.00 please.
>
> > > > > > >  With all of her experience as a mother,  school fund raising and 
> > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > *deep political ties* Caroline Kennedy is asking Clinton for the
> > > > > > > appointment.  In other words, she is wanting it handed to her.  
> > > > > > > Why?
> > > > > > > Why not run for office and get ELECTED.  Why even ask for an
> > > > > > > appointment to a seat, when voting should be the only way one 
> > > > > > > holds a
> > > > > > > public office? (Appointment to me is more like a Monarchy) Her
> > > > > > > bloodline shouldn't excuse her from having to run for office and 
> > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > experience as a mother, community volunteering and Kennedy 
> > > > > > > bloodline
> > > > > > > doesn't quailify her for the job.  The Dems nailed Palin to the 
> > > > > > > cross
> > > > > > > for using her experience as a mother and school volunteer as part 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > her resume`.  Why does Caroline Kennedy get a free pass from the
> > > > > > > Dems?
>
> > > > > > > :o)
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 29, 8:06 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Let's apply your standards to another president, shall we? This 
> > > > > > > > time,
> > > > > > > > rather than the complete failure Bush, we will apply your 
> > > > > > > > criteria to
> > > > > > > > someone who is considered (by some anyway) to be one of our 
> > > > > > > > greatest
> > > > > > > > presidents:
>
> > > > > > > > "One of my favorite lessons in the world of overcoming failures 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > understanding the value of persistence is what can be learned 
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > looking at the life of Abraham Lincoln. Born into poverty, Mr. 
> > > > > > > > Lincoln
> > > > > > > > was faced with defeat throughout most of his life. He twice 
> > > > > > > > failed in
> > > > > > > > business, lost eight different elections and suffered a nervous
> > > > > > > > breakdown. The following bullet points represent Lincoln’s path 
> > > > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > > White House:
>
> > > > > > > > 1816: Lincoln’s family lost their home and he had to quit 
> > > > > > > > school to
> > > > > > > > support them.
> > > > > > > > 1818: His mother passed away.
> > > > > > > > 1831: He failed in business.
> > > > > > > > 1832: He ran for state legislature and lost, also lost his job, 
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > while he wanted to go to law school he couldn’t get in.
> > > > > > > > 1833: He borrowed money to start a new business and was 
> > > > > > > > bankrupt by
> > > > > > > > the end of the year. He spent the next 17 years paying off the 
> > > > > > > > debt.
> > > > > > > > 1834: He ran for state legislature again and this time he won.
> > > > > > > > 1835: He was engaged to be married and his fiance died.
> > > > > > > > 1836: Mr. Lincoln suffered a total nervous breakdown and spent 
> > > > > > > > six
> > > > > > > > months in bed.
> > > > > > > > 1838: He sought to become speaker of the state legislature and 
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > again defeated.
> > > > > > > > 1840: He sought to become elector and was defeated.
> > > > > > > > 1843: Lincoln ran for Congress and lost.
> > > > > > > > 1846: He ran for Congress again and this time he won.
> > > > > > > > 1848: Lincoln lost his re-election race for Congress.
> > > > > > > > 1849: He sought the position of land officer in his home state 
> > > > > > > > and was
> > > > > > > > turned down.
> > > > > > > > 1854: Lincoln ran for the US Senate and lost.
> > > > > > > > 1856: He sought the Vice-Presidential nomination and lost 
> > > > > > > > receiving
> > > > > > > > less than 100 votes.
> > > > > > > > 1858: He ran yet again for the US Senate and lost.
> > > > > > > > 1860: Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United 
> > > > > > > > States. "
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.n2growth.com/blog/fear-failure-risk-and-success
>
> > > > > > > > It just goes to show that bloodline means nothing, and even a 
> > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > "nobody" can be influential and successful. Your comment about 
> > > > > > > > Obama
> > > > > > > > being a nobody in comparison to Bush's political legacy 
> > > > > > > > suggests you
> > > > > > > > might be happier under a monarch rather than a democracy.
> > > > > > > > By the way, how do you feel about Caroline Kennedy seeking a 
> > > > > > > > senate
> > > > > > > > seat? After all, her family has had a political presence, so 
> > > > > > > > she must
> > > > > > > > be qualified, right?
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 28, 10:10 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > What bloodline? You mean someone who never built a company? 
> > > > > > > > > Had
> > > > > > > > > executive experience? Served in the military? Didn't use the 
> > > > > > > > > System?
> > > > > > > > > Gravitate to Illinois? Dangerous friends and ministers?
>
> > > > > > > > > On Dec 28, 8:52 pm, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Isn't that what America is all about... letting the people 
> > > > > > > > > > pick their
> > > > > > > > > > leader rather than allowing bloodline to determine it? I 
> > > > > > > > > > believe
> > > > > > > > > > that's one of the reasons we split from England. Ain't it 
> > > > > > > > > > great?
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 28, 9:48 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > At least the Bush family existed in American politics. 
> > > > > > > > > > > Obama is the
> > > > > > > > > > > biggest nobody to become a somebody since Jesus Christ.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 28, 8:27 pm, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.goodnightbush.com/-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to