Thanks, you're the greatest!


On Dec 29, 7:22 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mrs R !!!
>
> I agree with governors filling vacancies about as much as I agree wth
> the "War Poweres Act" and "Free Speech Zones".
>
> However those laws have been in the constitutions of the various
> states for (in NY"s case) centuries.
>
> It is the office of an "elected" official.
>
> Yes, I vote in the US, Arizona, Maricopa County, Tempe elections as
> well as Germany / Kreiss-Bingen, Mainz and Costa Rica, Puntarenas,
> Bahia-Ballena elections.
>
> The ability to do so in so many areas is why I would not ever consider
> running for elected office in any of them... simply not fair as my
> bias would show, I'm sure (though I'm not sure what that bias would
> be).
>
> Pick away at the brain. I love helping the honestly inquisitive.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Mrs. Rabbit <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> > No Mark, I do not live in NY, but my Grandmother, two uncles, aunt and
> > many cousins do live in NY.
> > And yes, they should be able to vote for whom they would like to hold
> > the seat.  They will have to live with what is given to them, like a
> > monarchy, they will be told who will have that seat until 2010.  Like
> > I have said before, the law needs to be change so the people can vote
> > in all elections.  There should be NO Appointment, only elections.
> > Let the true voice of the people be heard.
>
> > Do you vote in the US elections?
>
> > btw, it's good to see you.  Been meaning to shoot you an email, the
> > oldest rabbit is talking senior trip!  Thought I would pick your
> > brain, if ya don't mind.  :o)  You helped out so well on the food
> > project last year!  Thanks!
>
> > On Dec 29, 4:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Mrs R,
>
> >> She will not be a breath away from the oval office. She will NOT
> >> represent you. She would represent the State of New York in the
> >> Senate, and frankly (and legally) it is a question to be answered by
> >> the Constitution of that particular state alone. Who gets the seat is
> >> NOT a direct national issue. You are not from New York, are you ??
>
> >> On Dec 29, 2:22 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Stop it Mike, you make my sides hurt from LOL @ U!
>
> >> > I was just pointing it out that her experience wasn't being attacked
> >> > such as Palin's was.  No need to answer, I already know it's because
> >> > she is in favor with the Dem party.  Not because she is *REALLY*
> >> > qualified!
>
> >> > :o)
>
> >> > On Dec 29, 2:33 pm, "mike [never forget] 532"
>
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > you guys said experience didn't matter when you picked palin so we
> >> > > took you at your word .
>
> >> > > On Dec 29, 1:26 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Read the articles, she wants to be appointed now.  She can't wait and
> >> > > > RUN for the office.  If an appointment is the only means to fill such
> >> > > > a position, then by all means, appoint someone with EXPERIENCE, not
> >> > > > just *deep political ties* and a family curse over their head.
>
> >> > > > Where is all the outrage of lack of experience from the Dems on this
> >> > > > one?
>
> >> > > > On Dec 29, 10:53 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > "I never implied it was *just the dems*, spare me the drama. "
>
> >> > > > > "Why does Caroline Kennedy get a free pass from the Dems? "
>
> >> > > > > It's not a free pass, it's the way things are done routinely.
>
> >> > > > > *****************
>
> >> > > > > "It is tacky to say the least for Kennedy to even announce she
> >> > > > > is seeking appointment but states she will not run for office."
>
> >> > > > > Where do you get that?
> >> > > > > " Asked whether she would run for the office if Gov. David Paterson
> >> > > > > doesn't appoint her, she replied: 
> >> > > > > "Absolutely."http://www.progressiveinvolvement.com/progressive_involvement/2008/12...
>
> >> > > > > On Dec 29, 10:46 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > I never implied it was *just the dems*, spare me the drama.
>
> >> > > > > > It is the law and to prevent appointment (monarchy style 
> >> > > > > > government),
> >> > > > > > the law should be changed to allow elections in situtations such 
> >> > > > > > as
> >> > > > > > this.  It is tacky to say the least for Kennedy to even announce 
> >> > > > > > she
> >> > > > > > is seeking appointment but states she will not run for office.  
> >> > > > > > Says
> >> > > > > > much about her character, or should I say, lack of?
>
> >> > > > > > Where is the outrage from the Dems about her lack of 
> >> > > > > > *experience* in
> >> > > > > > politics?  Her *strong* political ties?  Which, btw, scare me to
> >> > > > > > death...maybe it's the whole family curse thingy.  Her 
> >> > > > > > experience as a
> >> > > > > > mother and community volunteer are two experiences she list and 
> >> > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > being ignored by the dems.  Why is that?
>
> >> > > > > > On Dec 29, 10:24 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > So are you proposing special elections for vacated seats?
> >> > > > > > > I'm not sure I agree with appointments but right now there 
> >> > > > > > > doesn't
> >> > > > > > > seem to be a better way. But, it is the law, and it's not just 
> >> > > > > > > Dems
> >> > > > > > > that do it.
>
> >> > > > > > > On Dec 29, 9:49 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > stab....not stap  Why use spell check, when we have you?  =D
>
> >> > > > > > > > Doesn't matter if the seat is being vacated in the middle of 
> >> > > > > > > > a term or
> >> > > > > > > > not, the law should be changed to prevent appointment.  
> >> > > > > > > > Elected to a
> >> > > > > > > > seat by the people should be the only way one should hold a 
> >> > > > > > > > public
> >> > > > > > > > office.  Maybe one day American will see that and change 
> >> > > > > > > > from the
> >> > > > > > > > monarchy ways of old.
>
> >> > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 9:39 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > "Why not run for office and get ELECTED.  Why even ask for 
> >> > > > > > > > > an
> >> > > > > > > > > appointment to a seat, "
> >> > > > > > > > > Because the seat is being vacated in th middle of a term, 
> >> > > > > > > > > and there
> >> > > > > > > > > is no election. The governor of the state has sole 
> >> > > > > > > > > authority to
> >> > > > > > > > > appoint a successor to the seat, who will hold the office 
> >> > > > > > > > > until the
> >> > > > > > > > > next election in 2010. This is the way it's done by both 
> >> > > > > > > > > Republicans
> >> > > > > > > > > and Democrats, by law.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > What is a stap?
>
> >> > > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 9:25 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" 
> >> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Mornin' Wncs,
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > I'll take a stap at that question for rigsy for $200.00 
> >> > > > > > > > > > please.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > >  With all of her experience as a mother,  school fund 
> >> > > > > > > > > > raising and her
> >> > > > > > > > > > *deep political ties* Caroline Kennedy is asking Clinton 
> >> > > > > > > > > > for the
> >> > > > > > > > > > appointment.  In other words, she is wanting it handed 
> >> > > > > > > > > > to her.  Why?
> >> > > > > > > > > > Why not run for office and get ELECTED.  Why even ask 
> >> > > > > > > > > > for an
> >> > > > > > > > > > appointment to a seat, when voting should be the only 
> >> > > > > > > > > > way one holds a
> >> > > > > > > > > > public office? (Appointment to me is more like a 
> >> > > > > > > > > > Monarchy) Her
> >> > > > > > > > > > bloodline shouldn't excuse her from having to run for 
> >> > > > > > > > > > office and her
> >> > > > > > > > > > experience as a mother, community volunteering and 
> >> > > > > > > > > > Kennedy bloodline
> >> > > > > > > > > > doesn't quailify her for the job.  The Dems nailed Palin 
> >> > > > > > > > > > to the cross
> >> > > > > > > > > > for using her experience as a mother and school 
> >> > > > > > > > > > volunteer as part of
> >> > > > > > > > > > her resume`.  Why does Caroline Kennedy get a free pass 
> >> > > > > > > > > > from the
> >> > > > > > > > > > Dems?
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > :o)
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 8:06 am, wncs <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Let's apply your standards to another president, shall 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > we? This time,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > rather than the complete failure Bush, we will apply 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > your criteria to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > someone who is considered (by some anyway) to be one 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > of our greatest
> >> > > > > > > > > > > presidents:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > "One of my favorite lessons in the world of overcoming 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > failures and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > understanding the value of persistence is what can be 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > learned from
> >> > > > > > > > > > > looking at the life of Abraham Lincoln. Born into 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > poverty, Mr. Lincoln
> >> > > > > > > > > > > was faced with defeat throughout most of his life. He 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > twice failed in
> >> > > > > > > > > > > business, lost eight different elections and suffered 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > a nervous
> >> > > > > > > > > > > breakdown. The following bullet points represent 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Lincoln's path to the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > White House:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1816: Lincoln's family lost their home and he had to 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > quit school to
> >> > > > > > > > > > > support them.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1818: His mother passed away.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1831: He failed in business.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1832: He ran for state legislature and lost, also lost 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > his job, and
> >> > > > > > > > > > > while he wanted to go to law school he couldn't get in.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1833: He borrowed money to start a new business and 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > was bankrupt by
> >> > > > > > > > > > > the end of the year. He spent the next 17 years paying 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > off the debt.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1834: He ran for state legislature again and this time 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > he won.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1835: He was engaged to be married and his fiance died.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1836: Mr. Lincoln suffered a total nervous breakdown 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > and spent six
> >> > > > > > > > > > > months in bed.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1838: He sought to become speaker of the state 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > legislature and was
> >> > > > > > > > > > > again defeated.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1840: He sought to become elector and was defeated.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1843: Lincoln ran for Congress and lost.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1846: He ran for Congress again and this time he won.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > 1848: Lincoln lost his re-election
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to