Show me the quotes from the convention. Then we will continue on a
fact only basis.




On 1/18/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> what the israelites are doing is covered in the Geneva convention
> under war crimes .
>
> On Jan 18, 10:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > No, Mike. War crimes and that which makes them so is carefully defined
> > in the covenants. Nothing you are proffering meets the requirements.
> >
> > I am not justifying anything. I am saying your logic is flawed and
> > that it is NOT supported by fact.
> >
> > By using the acts of Hamas I am pointing out things that DO qualify as
> > war crimes. It is, for me, an arguement over legalities.
> > confrontations like these have no good and bad, just bad and worse.
> > legal definitions do NOT contain or allow room for emotions. I suggest
> > you check yours at the door and take another look.
> >
> > On 1/18/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > the one small detail as you call it is that they are committing war
> > > crimes !
> > > and you are trying to justify the indefensible by saying but the
> > > Palestinians are bad people too . so fucking what ? they are all bad
> > > people people and the war crimes are still being committed !
> > > On Jan 17, 4:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Mike, on this issue you are NO different than Gaar. you are paying
> > > > attention to one SMALL but not insignificant part of the story and
> > > > considering that which sticks in your craw as the ONLY point of view.
> >
> > > > Phosphorous is legal. Bombing a house where there are combatants is
> > > > NOT a crime. Throwing a grenade into your living room is illegal
> > > > EXCEPT when an overt threat is directed at me.... it does NOT MATTER
> > > > who is there with you. There were shots fired from the UN compound
> > > > (not the first time, I have seen it in the Congo) The UN (my
> > > > employers) were NOT allowed in the compound yet were (and are),
> > > > responsible for those that enter and what is on their persons, they
> > > > are trying to deny their responsibilities. To take action against
> > > > shots from within or from nearby that compound is NOT a crime. To stop
> > > > a boat from entering Israeli waters when that is its STATED and
> > > > MANIFESTED purpose is NOT a crime. Israel gave notice to the
> > > > international community and shipping about hours and places of
> > > > admission... and have complied with that schedule.... the people on
> > > > that boat CHOSE to ignore it, they could have been legally sunk.
> >
> > > > NEXT !!!!!
> >
> > > > By definition these are NOT in any sense of the word, war crimes.
> >
> > > > It is Hamas that is steadfastly refusing the cease fire and demanding
> > > > unchecked admission to Israel.
> >
> > > > On 1/17/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > mark are you saying the Israelis have not used phosphorus or bombed
> > > > > civilian houses ? oh and lets not forget about bombing the UN camp as
> > > > > well as attacking ships in international waters .
> > > > > each and every one of these things is a war crime as you well know and
> > > > > nothing the palestinians do or did will justify the Jews committing
> > > > > war crimes .
> > > > > On Jan 17, 3:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > You have yet to point to one FACT confirming your position.... you 
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > starting to sound just like Gaar.
> >
> > > > > > On 1/17/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >  Do you think Hamas did NOT realize that offensive action would be
> > > > > > > > taken when the Israelis were fired on ??
> > > > > > > that has nothing to do with the fact that the Jews are committing 
> > > > > > > war
> > > > > > > crimes ! nothing can justifie commiting war crimes nothing !
> > > > > > > On Jan 17, 12:35 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > It seems that you overlooked this one small point.
> >
> > > > > > > > Do you think Hamas did NOT realize that offensive action would 
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > taken when the Israelis were fired on ?? They knew. They did 
> > > > > > > > not care.
> >
> > > > > > > > Mike, if you shoot at me from your family room and it is full of
> > > > > > > > peole... I'm shooting back. Where the confrontation takes place 
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > your choice and the results (based on location) on your head.
> >
> > > > > > > > Israeli PM Olmert said Hamas militants had fired at Israeli 
> > > > > > > > troops
> > > > > > > > from the location.
> >
> > > > > > > > Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the military fired 
> > > > > > > > artillery
> > > > > > > > shells at the U.N. compound after Hamas militants opened fire 
> > > > > > > > from the
> > > > > > > > location. Three people were wounded.
> >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, liberal mike532  !
> >
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Israeli Forces Shell UN Headquarters in Gaza
> > > > > > > > >http://www.truthout.org/011509C
> > > > > > > > > Ibrahim Barzak and Amy Teibel, The Associated Press: "Israeli 
> > > > > > > > > forces
> > > > > > > > > shelled the United Nations headquarters in the Gaza Strip on
> > > > > > > > > Thursday,
> > > > > > > > > setting fire to the compound filled with hundreds of refugees 
> > > > > > > > > as U.N.
> > > > > > > > > chief Ban Ki-moon was in the region on a mission to end 
> > > > > > > > > Israel's
> > > > > > > > > devastating offensive against the territory's Hamas rulers."
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jan 17, 10:15 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> What proof do you have of that Mike??
> >
> > > > > > > > >> The crime being committed is the use of non-combatants as 
> > > > > > > > >> fodder.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> There is no proof Israel has used a single illegal weapon, 
> > > > > > > > >> targeted a
> > > > > > > > >> single spot without proof a combatant was there, or 
> > > > > > > > >> prosecuted the war
> > > > > > > > >> with unnecessary force.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> Yet Hamas demands unfettered access to Israel as one of 
> > > > > > > > >> their demands.
> > > > > > > > >> Hell, it takes a passport to enter canada and mexico now.... 
> > > > > > > > >> no one
> > > > > > > > >> gets unfettered access to anyone elses country. Talk about 
> > > > > > > > >> unreal and
> > > > > > > > >> knowing it !!
> >
> > > > > > > > >> On 1/17/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > not one word of that has anything to do the Jews 
> > > > > > > > >> > committing war
> > > > > > > > >> > crimes !
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > On Jan 17, 9:46 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > Margareth,
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Being nice did not work. The Moslem fanatics can not 
> > > > > > > > >> > > allow it to work.
> > > > > > > > >> > > It is absolutely counter to their goals and hoped for 
> > > > > > > > >> > > control of every
> > > > > > > > >> > > aspect of the lives of every Moslem to allow it to do so.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Just imagine what would happen to their doctrine if rule 
> > > > > > > > >> > > of
> > > > > > > > >> > > non-secular law were to function in the very heart of 
> > > > > > > > >> > > their
> > > > > > > > >> > > territories.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > On 1/17/09, margareth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > If you check the map of Palestine, and Gaza, it would 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > be useful if you
> > > > > > > > >> > > > remember that the country is smaller than most North 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > American
> > > > > > > > >> > > > counties, and holds 1.4 million residents. Of course 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > they are aiming
> > > > > > > > >> > > > at civilian targets.... it would be hard to miss them. 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > Having said
> > > > > > > > >> > > > that,  the Israelis are their own worst enemies in 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > this situation, The
> > > > > > > > >> > > > destruction of Gaza and all the people in it is the 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > most likely result
> > > > > > > > >> > > > if they persist with the bombs, etc. It is the 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > Israelis who seem to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > have a surplus of armaments for this purpose.  Just 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > who is likely to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > profit from this war?
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jan 17, 3:16 am, "liberal mike532  !" 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > can you dispute an of the points i have made with 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > facts?
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Jan 16, 3:49 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > That is just NOT true, It is very unlike you.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > That's kinda funny, actually. I think this is very 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > much like Mike, who
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > will exaggerate, embellish or fabricate whatever 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > is required to make
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > his point.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Jan 16, 1:45 pm, Mark <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > That is just NOT true, It is very unlike you.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The phosphorous is allowed as an obscurant. 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > There has been no proof of
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > TARGETING civilians. If the UN (my ex boss) does 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > not want its camps
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > hit then they need to keep them free of 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > combatants (it is one of their
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > responsibilities).
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It is completely legal to target combatants 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > regardless of where they
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > set up camp. This includes day care centers and 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > schools and hospitals
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > and nursing homes.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 1/16/09, liberal mike532  ! 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the Jews have been using white phoperous on 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > civilians which is a war
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > crime and have been targeting civilians not to 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > mention a UN refuge
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > camp .
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 11:36 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Mike, they are not. They have not used a 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > single banned weapon or
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > tactic.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > They have not targeted a single location 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > that did not have
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > combatants.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > There is no proof to the contrary. This can 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > NOT be said for Hamas or
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > the Gazan people.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The fact that women and children are in the 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > locations where the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Palestinian combatants set up shop speaks to 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > the value they place on
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > their own people. It also shows the 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > non-combatants basic intelligence
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > for staying with their women and children 
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > (or actually bringing them
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
Mark M. Kahle
Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to