Good Morning Mark!

You just answered your own question.

The twenty eight detainees were not prisoners of war, in the sense of a foot
soldier,  as the clause you are referencing is referring to.  These
individuals where enhanced interrogation tactics were utilized, (and no, I
do not believe that the enhanced interrogation tactics resulted in torture,
I don't think anyone in good conscience can believe that if they read the
Memoranda)   were homicidal murderers intent on killing Americans.

Further, out of the over nine hundred that were captured and detained, based
on the information that has been released to date, only 28 of them were
exposed to any coercive interrogation tactics in order to obtain
information.  The remaining nine hundred plus, were treated no differently
than any other American prisoner in the federal Bureau of Prisons' system,
as can be witnessed at both Baghdad Central Prison and Guantanamo.

Folks keep forgetting the era also.  At the time that these enhanced
interrogation tactics were being utilized, on the twenty eight that are
being referenced, our intelligence departments literally did not know who,
or what we were dealing with, and especially where or when the next wave of
attacks were coming.  All Americans were fearful of dirty bombs, chemical
attacks, or planes being flown into our skyscrapers.  It wasn't a question
of "if" but a question of "when".   Our federal government by the mandate of
the United States Constitution, has a duty to "insure domestic tranquilty,
provide for the common defense, and promote the general welfare..."

Had the Bush Administration failed to have done as much as they did, we very
well might not be having this converstaion right now.



On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Keith,
>
> How is this for Myth ??
>
> QUOTE<<<<No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of
> coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them
> information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to
> answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant
> or disadvantageous treatment of any kind.>>>>>UNQUOTE  Part III :
> Captivity #Section I : Beginning of captivity ARTICLE 17
>
> Now we are back to discussing the POW definition. The law is VERY
> specific.       NEXT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> On Apr 23, 8:20 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Waterboarding as it was applied to THE THREE HOMICIDAL MURDERERS THAT
> WERE
> > ATTEMPTING TO KILL YOU was not specifically against any international law
> or
> > treatise that the United States was a signatory.
> >
> > Waterboarding as we applied it, was not torture!
> >
> > MoonbatMyths!!!!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Apr 22, 10:21 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I think a better way of framing your question Studio, is, "That if
> the
> > > > enhanced interrogation technique of waterboarding is 'torture', then
> how
> > > > does one survive the procedure after 183 times?"
> >
> > > I don't know, let's try it on you to make sure.
> >
> > > The fact is the US was a International signatory against torture,
> > > which also
> > > includes water boarding.
> > > It was and is against the law, period.
> >
> > > It's really nice how you conservative moralists love telling everyone
> > > how
> > > moral and effective torture is.
> >
> > > INTERROGATOR:
> > > Have you been ripping the American people off for the last eight
> > > years?
> >
> > > BUSH - CHENEY:
> > > No, we were protecting...
> >
> > > INTERROGATOR:
> > > Fill 'em up boys, they'll tell us what we want to hear even if it
> > > takes 183 times.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to