They undercut the family as a unit of society and I think there is
undercurrent of revenge or psychotic reaction to heterosexuals. Lord
knows the family is a complicated affair along with sex made worse by
the theories of shrinks but I think of gays and lesbians as spoiled
fruits.

On May 3, 6:00�pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Keith how does a civil union endanger YOUR marriage,
> answer that one for me.
>
> On May 2, 11:27�am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > As I said in another thread, I am catching up, its been a busy week.
>
> > Hey Rigs!!
>
> > �I only wish that I had a whole lotta women hangin' out here at the Keith In
> > Tampa Hacienda. �I would be delighted to put on a little show!! �No, Renee
> > still comes around, mainly to bitch, gripe, and make me take her out
> > somewhere expensive. �She would definitely be quashing/putting the hiatus on
> > gals coming over here in the front lawn....It ain't gonna happen I don't
> > think.....
>
> > Sugarshack and Holly,
>
> > The standard still exists in this Nation, �which is that most, the majority
> > of Americans, believe that it is wrong by a bunch of secularist far left
> > socialists attempting to change the definition of marriage. � Marriage is
> > still to this day, an ecclisiastical function, there is no such thing as a
> > "civil marriage" as hard as secularists want to make it so.
>
> > Most Americans have no problem with civil unions, in fact, California has a
> > civil union law in place now. �That was not good enough for folks like Perez
> > Hilton, they want to redefine marriage, and they want to shove their
> > lifestyle down our throats, if you disagree, then you are immediately
> > branded a "homophobe". �It has nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights.
> > NOTHING!!!
>
> > My point being, is your "standards" from the mid to late 19th century is
> > misplaced Holly, and Sugarshack, �wake up and smell the coffee!!! �Put down
> > the cocktails, step away from the pharmaceuticals, and no more ganja for
> > you!!!
>
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > Let's rewind the tape, The STANDARD is stupidity
> > > and that is the dumb blond and YOU identify with
> > > the dumb blond's ideas. So the TWO of you have the
> > > same STANDARDS, So if attaining the STANDARD is
> > > Nirvana, do you need me to continue connecting the dots, or are you
> > > to stupid to make it to nirvana, Dick?
>
> > > On Apr 30, 7:51 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Nirvana is when you attained the standard. �Since stupidity is the
> > > > standard, you are not being intelligent and I am not being stupid. �You
> > > > really need to think things through before you respond.
>
> > > > VT VirtualTruth wrote:
> > > > > And you are merely average, Nirvana meaning in my case
> > > > > being intelligent and in your case, stupid.
>
> > > > > On Apr 30, 7:32 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> You must have attained nirvana then.
>
> > > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote:
>
> > > > >>> Stupidity is a standard we should all be striving for?
>
> > > > >>> On Apr 30, 7:25 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >>>> You really are a putz. �The US had standards for a long while and
> > > this
> > > > >>>> girl reflected those standards well. �They served us just fine 
> > > > >>>> until
> > > the
> > > > >>>> people like Perez Hilton came along. �Believe it or not California
> > > has
> > > > >>>> been a part of the US for a good long while and a lot of the 
> > > > >>>> country
> > > > >>>> does agree with the standards Miss California talked about.
>
> > > > >>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>> California is a country?
> > > > >>>>> That made sense to you?
>
> > > > >>>>> On Apr 30, 7:02 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>>> She sure made a lot of sense to anyone who cares about the
> > > standards the
> > > > >>>>>> country lived by when it was building this nation. �She made a 
> > > > >>>>>> lot
> > > of
> > > > >>>>>> sense to anyone who stands for their beliefs rather than spin in
> > > the
> > > > >>>>>> wind to point whatever direction is the latest fad. �Maybe you
> > > just
> > > > >>>>>> failed to understand anyone with standards?
>
> > > > >>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>>>> The fact that the woman made no sense had nothing to do with
> > > > >>>>>>> her losing? So made the dumb blond stereotype seem to �be a
> > > reality.
>
> > > > >>>>>>> When did the Miss America contest become an important issue?
>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/29/finding-her-new-cause/- 
> > >Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to