jgg,

Go back and read BOTH of your posts I refer to.

On May 26, 11:08 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes Hollywood fear-mongering 24/7...   And please learn to read...  I
> said
>
> >>> Taking extremist statements and broad brush it to all
>
> of the opposition IS part of the typical fear-monger done by extreme
> wings of both sides...
>
> Now how did you spin this???
>
> >>> Oh? And when you clowns do it I suppose it's an ACCIDENT of some sort,
>
> as opossed to beling PLANNED?  LMFAO!
>
> I said both sides,  you restricted my statement to one side so you
> could ridicule...   Typical straw-man...
>
> On May 26, 10:08 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > jjg,
>
> > Oh? And when you clowns do it I suppose it's an ACCIDENT of some sort,
> > as opossed to beling PLANNED?  LMFAO!
>
> > You've gone in one post from "yet the fear-mongering was 24/7 by the
> > left" to "some on the left do fear-mongering...." And you want to talk
> > about the "broad brush" I am using?
>
> > There are extremists on both sides? No shit!
>
> > On May 26, 8:58 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes Hollywood...   Some on the Left often do fear-mongering in the
> > > PLANNED demonization of their opponents...   That you refuse to
> > > confront that very human and partisan aspect of the Left is
> > > telling...   Also that you seek to characterize the Right by
>
> > > >>> "do what we say, give us what we want or the terorists will come and 
> > > >>> kill you all in your beds".
>
> > > is telling...   Taking extremist statements and broad brush it to all
> > > of the opposition IS part of the typical fear-monger done by extreme
> > > wings of both sides...
>
> > > And the plain fact is on 9/12 there was real uncertainty as to the
> > > scope and nature of the threat of AQ...   Reasonable men in those
> > > circumstances  do change behavior and limit potential unknown
> > > threats...   That simple fact is normally ignored by the Left in this
> > > country.
>
> > > On May 24, 9:35 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > jgg,
>
> > > > Fear-mongering by the LEFT????
>
> > > > Oh BTW, I lost track, what is the TERRORIST DANGER ALERT COLOR today.
> > > > orange, yellow, hot pink?
> > > > Pul-eeeeze, the right has been screaming for 8 years now "do what we
> > > > say, give us what we want or the terorists will come and kill you all
> > > > in your beds".
>
> > > > On May 22, 12:59 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Very true...   My point is the real reason often dictates what happens
> > > > > after the fact...   Hence after WWI we did the Marshall Plan and the
> > > > > Russians did satellite states...
>
> > > > > In much of the opposition to the US in Iraq, one claim was American
> > > > > Imperialism and lust after oil --- ie we wanted to steal Iraqi oil...
> > > > > Clearly this is not going to be a result PRINCIPALLY due to that was
> > > > > never an aim...   Yet the fear-mongering was 24/7 by the Left...
>
> > > > > On May 22, 1:25 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > Your simply impossible. The WHY is determined by what the individual
> > > > > > country thinks is in it's best interests at any given time. That's
> > > > > > what I've been saying all along.
> > > > > > There are almost always TWO reasons for what a country does. The 
> > > > > > REAL
> > > > > > reason and thwe reason given to the public in order to gain their
> > > > > > support or at least nullify resistence/opposition.
>
> > > > > > On May 22, 11:36 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Once again
>
> > > > > > > At the end of the day WHY a great power acts matters at times...  
> > > > > > >  It
> > > > > > > helps to determine WHAT they do AFTER the deed...    Hence The
> > > > > > > Marshall plan post WWII verses European Retributions demanded from
> > > > > > > Germany post WWI...   Or Russia after WWII...
>
> > > > > > > On May 22, 11:31 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > > > SO? I'll ask you again, what is the point you are trying to 
> > > > > > > > make?
>
> > > > > > > > On May 22, 10:15 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > You forget Pakistani ISI...
>
> > > > > > > > > On May 21, 5:41 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > > > > > So? The Russians invaded Afghanistan at one point, we did 
> > > > > > > > > > at another
> > > > > > > > > > point and AQ did at yet another. What's your point here? 
> > > > > > > > > > And yes, all
> > > > > > > > > > parties had their own resons for doing so.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 21, 11:55 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Techinically, AQ invaded Iraq and Afghanistan...   Unless 
> > > > > > > > > > > you buy into
> > > > > > > > > > > the notion that their universial world governemnt self 
> > > > > > > > > > > proclaimed by
> > > > > > > > > > > definition makes that impossible...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 21, 11:35 am, Hollywood 
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Uh yeah, they changed from killing Russians invading 
> > > > > > > > > > > > their land to
> > > > > > > > > > > > killing Americans & Brits invading their land. Thought 
> > > > > > > > > > > > I had explained
> > > > > > > > > > > > that.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On May 21, 9:54 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Or maybe it depends on the circumstance...  Like how 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > OBL and AQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > changed over the years...   Another example is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > supporting Stalin in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1942-45 and fighting him from 1948-1953...   Why the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > change???  Simple
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stalin's actions post WWII...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 21, 10:26 am, Hollywood 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT arguement of "because we helped S.H. we are 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > responsible for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > end result?" Look at my posts, what I ACTUALLY 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > said. Where did I say
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > any such thing?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > OF course our political policy is based on what is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > convient for us at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the moment. One decade Osama Bin Laden is a "deeply 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > religious freedom
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fighter" another decade the same man is a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "murdering Muslim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > terrorist". All depends on wheter he's killing 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Russians or Brits and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Americans. Duuuuuuh.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 10:31 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another of your straw-men Hollywood...  
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Especially as I never have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > been of the attitude ""your either for us or 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against us"...   Neither
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was Bush for that matter...  Now the LW anti-war 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fringe WAS and IS...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence Pelosi's new dance step...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now my point with Russia IS and was, geopolitical 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alliance normally
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are temporary based on convenience...    As was 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our help to Saddam,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our interest was not to let either Iraq nor Iran 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > win...   And that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > policy drove our actions...   Second, the arms we 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supplied helped us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the Russians defeat Hitler ---  the question 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here is the refusal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Russia to WITHDRAWAL to its pre war borders 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WAS a consequence of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that win...  This included incorporating the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Baltic and much of Poland
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into USSR...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  ANd the argument used with with Saddam is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BECAUSE we helped him, WE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are responsible for the end result...    Applying 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that logic to WWII,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we were responsible for 40 years of repression in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eastern Europe...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I reject that line of reasoning in the cases 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Russia during WWI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Saddam post 1987...   The issue here do you 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also reject the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasoning???  If so the issue of our limited help 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to Saddam in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 80's is a none issue...  If you accept that 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > logic, then you logically
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > must hold we are guilty of repressing Eastern 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Europe for 40 years...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 10:16 am, Hollywood 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOW you want to resign the black/white world of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "your either for us or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against us" George Bush?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OH, we didn't want Russia it win against 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany, we only wanted to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > help them avoid defeat? When Russian tanks were 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rumbling thru the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > street of Berlin, hundreds of miles west of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > their borders, we were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merely helping them avoid defeat and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > destruction? Read a history book,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Russia help US to avoid defeat in Europe.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 8:55 am, jgg1000a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Hollywood, in the grown-up game of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > geopolitics that is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > significant difference...   In your Ivory 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tower of perfection,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ideology must remain pure by using only 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "moral" methods...   In WWII,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we allied with a Totalitarian tyrant not 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quite as dangerous as Hitler,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stalin, to beat Hitler...  We supplied him 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arms so he would not be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > defeated...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And Stalin used them to take over Eastern 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Europe after the war...   By
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your standards, we are responsible for Stalin 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > post war, even though he
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to