Hollywood, the mastermind was NOT captured by police methods or actions... Try to get your head around that concept...
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=46949 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/09/60II/main524947.shtml On Jun 2, 11:32 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Zeb, > > One man's STOOGES are another man's PERPETRATORS. > Ah but grasshopper, without the hands and feet the brains are helpless > OOOMMMMMMM... > You're waaaay too tense dude. > > On Jun 2, 7:47 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Holly, > > > As I said, the STOOGES were captured. These were NOT the people > > RESPONSIBLE for the bombings any more than the slaves who pulled the > > rocks were responsible for building the pyramids. I see you like to > > fool yourself with the flimsiest of premises. > > > On Jun 1, 7:21 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Zeb, > > > > Don't care if it was the I.R.A. or the Boy Scouts. I merely pointed > > > out that by using proper law enforcement techniques the criminals/ > > > terrorists/bad guys/whatever were captured, tried and imprisoned. > > > > On Jun 1, 12:01 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The first WTC bombing was an al Queda action. Omar Abdel Rahman acted > > > > on orders of al Queda commanders (bin Laden) and the guys who were > > > > convicted with him were stupid pawns who not only rented the van used > > > > in the bombing in their own name, they went back and tried to claim it > > > > was stolen. You call this "getting it done", when it comes to bringing > > > > the guys responsible for the bombing to justice? Worse than that, > > > > Clinton's people were so fixated on keeping intelligence and law > > > > enforcement from talking to each other for fear that it would harass > > > > illegal immigrants that they missed the seriousness and implications > > > > of the increasing frequency and ferocity of al Queda's attacks on our > > > > country. > > > > > On Jun 1, 12:31 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > Yeah he did treat it as a law enforcement problems. The result being > > > > > catching, trying and jailing the men who did the first WTC bombing. > > > > > Where's Osama? > > > > > Certainly not rotting in a U.S. Federal prison. > > > > > > On Jun 1, 11:27 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I give credit where credit is due. Clinton gets credit for signing > > > > > > welfare reform (something which Obama is currently looking to > > > > > > reverse). I give Clinton credit for negotiating a much needed peace > > > > > > in > > > > > > Northern Ireland. But Clinton also treated an Islamic jihad against > > > > > > our country like it was an international law enforcement problem. > > > > > > One > > > > > > of his administrators, Jamie Gorelik, actively sought to deter > > > > > > various > > > > > > US law enforcement and intelligence agencies from sharing > > > > > > information. > > > > > > Clinton's justice department threatened banks that resisted making > > > > > > risky loans and his administration pressured Fannie Mae and Freddie > > > > > > Mac to lower lending standards, which allowed poisonous, risky loans > > > > > > to be packaged with good loans into mortgage backed securities that > > > > > > would eventually collapse and bring the world financial industry > > > > > > down > > > > > > with them. > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 11:45 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > > Anything you DON'T wish you could blame Bill Clinton for? > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 8:59 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How about this; what if terrorists hijack some planes and ram > > > > > > > > > them in buildings? > > > > > > > > > We can thank Mr. Clinton for inviting these terrorists into our > > > > > > > > country and letting them train here.....................right > > > > > > > > after we > > > > > > > > thank him and his perverted henchmen Franks and Dodd for > > > > > > > > causing a > > > > > > > > worldwide financial meltdown. > > > > > > > > > On May 29, 4:13 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 28, 5:06 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do not under estimate Japan's willingness to build nukes IF > > > > > > > > > > they think > > > > > > > > > > America will not be there in 5 years... And Obama if he > > > > > > > > > > follows some > > > > > > > > > > of the Democratic Left's thought will do just that... And > > > > > > > > > > there is > > > > > > > > > > some in Japan openly questioning just that... > > > > > > > > > > Who is under estimating Japan's ability to build nukes? > > > > > > > > > Obama and/or the democratic party according to you and the > > > > > > > > > article? > > > > > > > > > Get real. > > > > > > > > > Yeah, they'll sacrifice Japan and South Korea for better > > > > > > > > > China and > > > > > > > > > North Korea relations....you're living in a world of fantasy > > > > > > > > > paranoia. > > > > > > > > > You can thank Bush Jr. for that. > > > > > > > > > What if this, what if that....and none of your what if's ever > > > > > > > > > come > > > > > > > > > true. > > > > > > > > > > How about this; what if terrorists hijack some planes and ram > > > > > > > > > them in > > > > > > > > > buildings? > > > > > > > > > Ops, sorry, that already happened on Bush Jr's watch. > > > > > > > > > > What if the economy suffered a meltdown? > > > > > > > > > My bad, that already happened on Bush Jr's watch also. > > > > > > > > > > > Take the ABM technology. If Obama cuts thats that budget, > > > > > > > > > > Japan may > > > > > > > > > > think the US is NOT serious about the defense of Japan... > > > > > > > > > > Many in the > > > > > > > > > > Democratic Party want to cut this out of the budget... > > > > > > > > > > Problem is > > > > > > > > > > they just do not think in geo-political strategic terms... > > > > > > > > > > More paranoia fear mongering from the right as far as I can > > > > > > > > > see. > > > > > > > > > > And since when should a real Republican like you read > > > > > > > > > articles from a > > > > > > > > > phony > > > > > > > > > republican economic news service like Bloomberg news covering > > > > > > > > > military > > > > > > > > > strategy? > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't you be getting all your military strategy from Rush > > > > > > > > > Limburger?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
