actually the only thing that really interests me in this group are dick thompson's posted links
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, d.b.baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Time to establish a thread limit? For example, if prolific posters > want to aggregate/disseminate numerous news stories, it's more > advantageous to the group that they be confined to one or two daily > threads - as opposed to cluttering the board with numerous threads > (topics). Especially when the same news topics are widely available on > the net. > > I try to follow this approach myself, especially when posting quotes/ > links to/in a related topic. This doesn't guarantee "discussion" of > the specific subject per se, but it does acknowledge and respect the > fact that other members may not share a similar interest. > > It's also helpful to the group when we revive dormant threads to re- > address specific subject matter that's already posted, especially if > the thread generated a discussion (i.e., interest). > > In the end, it's a lot easier to scan a single topic/header than to go > back and forth between numerous threads. > > If you agree, we could to do this as a [voluntary] courtesy. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
