I try to post items that are not from the usual sources such as NYT and WAPOOP. And a few cartoons as well that need no reply. I space them out over the day so as to not look like I am spamming which I am not doing. That is all.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:06 PM, bruce majors <[email protected]>wrote: > actually the only thing that really interests me in this group are dick > thompson's posted links > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, d.b.baker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Time to establish a thread limit? For example, if prolific posters >> want to aggregate/disseminate numerous news stories, it's more >> advantageous to the group that they be confined to one or two daily >> threads - as opposed to cluttering the board with numerous threads >> (topics). Especially when the same news topics are widely available on >> the net. >> >> I try to follow this approach myself, especially when posting quotes/ >> links to/in a related topic. This doesn't guarantee "discussion" of >> the specific subject per se, but it does acknowledge and respect the >> fact that other members may not share a similar interest. >> >> It's also helpful to the group when we revive dormant threads to re- >> address specific subject matter that's already posted, especially if >> the thread generated a discussion (i.e., interest). >> >> In the end, it's a lot easier to scan a single topic/header than to go >> back and forth between numerous threads. >> >> If you agree, we could to do this as a [voluntary] courtesy. >> >> >> >> -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
