Tommy guns are one thing but "timmy guns" can never be banned. On Jun 28, 9:14 pm, The Supreme Turtle <[email protected]> wrote: > what is wrong with a tommy gun? If cops are issued it for self defense > why shouldn't other civilians be able to own one? > > On Jun 28, 10:55 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well, you can't usually go wrong if you agree with Richard! He's the > > last of the good ole boys! (note to Richard, I said ole, not OLD!) > > > Everyone should have the right to own a gun, not a Tommygun, but a > > shotgun or handgun. I have no problems with concealed weapons. I > > would much rather have mine concealed, than in plain view. But hey, > > that's just me! > > > On Jun 28, 10:24 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here I go agreeing with Richard again! > > > I don't recall the Constitution saying the right to bear arms means > > > the right to do so secretly. Why is that a right we need to protect. > > > And then, if some Blood gets caught with a glock downtown, lock him up > > > for 10 years! > > > > On Jun 28, 6:48 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > I hate the gun arguments. The conservatives act as if the > > > > constitution bans private organizations or companies from setting > > > > their own rules. Hells bells, there is no reason at all that a > > > > baseball stadium could not ban guns. On the other hand, liberals > > > > attempt to disguise efforts at limitation with the use of the word > > > > registration. Personally, I think every gun should be registered and > > > > logged in a central database along with ballistic records. Those > > > > steps in no way infringe on the freedom to own a gun and they assist > > > > the authorities in catching criminals who use guns in their crimes. > > > > Call me crazy, but I think both sides are wrong. > > > > > On Jun 28, 7:10 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I like owning a gun. I don't think people should be able to take Uzi's > > > > > to baseball games or nightclubs. I could say that you have been > > > > > "brainwashed" by right wing extremists who seem to deny the fact that > > > > > the Constitution has evolved over time but unlike those on the extreme > > > > > right, I don't have to insult or demean everyone who disagrees with > > > > > me. So I'll just assume that like me, you formed your opinion based on > > > > > personal insights and experiences. > > > > > Me? I've been stabbed once and shot twice by gang-bangers in high > > > > > school. So what is the solution? Arm all the kids in high school? How > > > > > about my friend who was shot in a bar? Arm all the drunks? > > > > > When the Constitution was written, there was no such thing as a police > > > > > force in America. We'd just fended off the British. Guns were needed > > > > > for food every bit as much for protection. "Wild savages" were killing > > > > > settlers all over the place. > > > > > Now, for every crime stopped with a gun, over 10,000 are committed > > > > > with one. > > > > > So while I respect your opinion, I simply disagree with it. This has > > > > > nothing to do with liberal left-wing brainwashing or whatever other > > > > > crap you care to hurl in my direction. It is just my opinion. > > > > > > On Jun 28, 1:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Fred, > > > > > > > I am not sure where you are going with this, and I read your > > > > > > message in > > > > > > another post; something to the effect that the government should > > > > > > restrict > > > > > > folks from bringing firearms (I think you referenced a bazooka) to a > > > > > > baseball game.....Or something or other. > > > > > > > You have literally been brainwashed by far left extremists who > > > > > > don't like > > > > > > our Constitution, especially the Clause that allows for Americans > > > > > > to defend > > > > > > themselves. The Second Amendment has worked just fine throughout > > > > > > our > > > > > > History, and has proven to be one of the reasons that we continue > > > > > > to remain > > > > > > a vibrant, free Nation-State. > > > > > > > I strongly encourage you to go and read the Federalist, as well as > > > > > > the > > > > > > Anti-Federalist Papers, both of which supported the language > > > > > > contained > > > > > > within the Second Amendment. > > > > > > > There were three major reasons for placing and documenting this > > > > > > unalienable > > > > > > right on paper: > > > > > > > 1. For Americans to be able to protect their homes and personal > > > > > > affects > > > > > > from domestic threats, to include, thieves, rogues, bandits, > > > > > > wildlife, axe > > > > > > murderers, etc.; > > > > > > > 2. For Americans to deter any acts of aggression from foreign > > > > > > invaders; > > > > > > but most importantly, > > > > > > > 3. To insure that our government was kept in check. > > > > > > > This third prong is the part that folks like Chuckie Schumer, DiFi, > > > > > > Babs > > > > > > Boxer, Maxine Waters, Bella Pelosi, and a host of other confused > > > > > > socialist-elitists who have an Anti-American agenda cannot stand, > > > > > > and wish > > > > > > to see done away with. > > > > > > > In other words, if the government has a tank, then I should have > > > > > > the right > > > > > > to have a tank. > > > > > > > There should be no restrictions on any law abiding citizen from > > > > > > owning > > > > > > whatever firearm he so chooses, it has nothing to do with hunting, > > > > > > it has to > > > > > > do with deterrence!! > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Frederick > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > [image: Right to Bear Amrs.JPG] > > > > > > > Right to Bear Amrs.JPG > > > > > > 450KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
