I suspect the deliberate moratorium on nuclear energy, building refineries,
and tapping our own resources, including our giant natural gas resources, is
a deliberate government policy.
You can only demand power and money in government when you keep having a
failure you need to solve.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Richard,
>
> Very good post. It has always amazed me that we were first able to put
> a man in orbit in the summer of 1961 and only 8 years later sent men
> to the freakin' moon and safely returned them to home. And at a time
> when all of NASA had computer capabilities probably less than the one
> I'm using right now.
> We need to put that sort of priority on freeing us from dependence on
> fossile fuels to the point we can tell the middle east to just drink
> their damn oil and pound their sand up their asses for all we care.
>
> We seem to simply lack the political will to do so.
>
> On Jul 11, 7:05 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Call it liberal, call it conservative or just call it crazy.  Here is
> > what I think needs to be done.
> >
> > We are fixated on fossil fuels.  Whether fossil fuels cause global
> > warming (personally I think the entire issue is based on silly
> > science) nobody can argue that it does damage to the ecology.  More
> > importantly, fossil fuels are not renewable in any reasonable period
> > of time and the reserves will run out some day.  In the short-term,
> > our dependence on fossil fuels creates a national security problem and
> > we actually funnel money to the middle east, thus financing much of
> > the terrorist activity we so fear.  However, we have federal
> > legislation that limits our ability in the short-term to mitigate our
> > increasing foreign dependence and we have a tax system that makes it
> > unprofitable for the oil companies to explore alternative and
> > renewable energy sources at the pace that is needed.
> >
> > Therefore, I propose that a NASA-like program, focused on development
> > and deployment of alternative and renewable energy sources be
> > established.  The primary source of funding would come from the
> > elimination of redundant and unnecessary existing government
> > programs.  The life of the agency would be capped at ten years.  The
> > purpose would be to advance those technologies that the free-market
> > cannot justify pursuing at this time.  The added scientific research
> > might push the oil companies to re-evaluate their development models.
> > However, if that is not enough, increasing the taxes on the
> > distribution networks may provide added boost.  However, this must be
> > offset by reduced taxes on the production of current oil reserves as
> > well as the simplifying of rules related to refining of oil products
> > and drilling.  If we do all of these things, we will create a short-
> > term cushion against foreign dependence while simultaneously
> > eliminating in the long-term, a dependence that cannot continue for
> > many reasons.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to