lol - well Keith like I said, your bias is pretty evident. In this very thread (let alone others), Sage loves to call names like morons Demwits etc... and "The Gall to talk about Bruce" came from little phrases like "Dick sucking shit eater". But of course when delivered by anyone whose ideology is not identical to you and Sir Bruce the Classy, that's nothing compared to what? "Kinda stupid"? Hmm. Very Palinesque! I get it! It is only the sins of OTHERS that are "crass". Yes, completely objective. You'll make a fine Conservative or Republican buddy! Umm hmmm. Absolutely. You need only start telling others their opinions to complete your journey down the Dark Side of the Force. ;-) Pretty funny.
On Jul 16, 6:12 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Fred, > > I don't need to know. I was offended by your crass less than polished > attack on Sage. And you have the gall to talk about Bruce??? > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > LOL Very funny Keith. Um, do you even know my position on the issue of > > this thread? > > > On Jul 16, 6:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sage: > > > > Look, three things are becoming obvious: > > > > 1. You drink the extreme right kool-aid. Fine. Bush never did ANYTHING > > > > wrong! Oh nooooo. You betcha ;-) He was a great president and that's > > > > why they used him so much during the campaign rofl. > > > > 2. You're kinda stupid. Well that's okay too. This would explain your > > > > love of Bush, Palin and inability to comprehend that I never said > > > > Bush's war was illegal. I said the soldier in 2006 made that > > > > contention. So fine. This would also help explain why you're so apt to > > > > believe what the GOP has told you to and follow blindly like a good > > > > little sheeple. > > > > 3. There are people here who are actually worth reading. Then there's > > > > people who use phrases like "idiotic boobery". lol. That's you. Well, > > > > that's fine. So, you're easily upset and prone to tantrums & insults. > > > > (have you EVER posted or replied without insulting someone?). Who > > > > knows, you might be low on meds... Well that's just oooookay now. I'm > > > > sure you are a swell and special person. God loves you. It will all be > > > > okay. Just breathe deeply and feel the good in the universe. Let out > > > > some of that negativity. Eat some bran flakes or something. > > > > People who can engage in intelligent and civil discourse have been > > > > source of new insights and perspectives for me. Idiotic boobery > > > > (really, thanks for that!) types never offer anything of substance, > > > > anything of value or anything that will be seriously considered by > > > > anyone who doesn't already share their point of view. They're not > > > > worth responding to, are they? > > > > > On Jul 16, 5:37 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mod-man, > > > > > > If Bush had broken any laws the libs would have proved > > > > > their case by now and impeached him. Unfortunately neither you nor > > the > > > > > libs can provide the silver bullet. Can you?! Put up, or as they say > > > > > " shut up". Conspiracy theory, Bush derangement syndrome, and > > hearsay > > > > > does not a CASE make. You think the Republicans took a fall, wait > > till > > > > > the 2010 elections. Any way you spin it, whatever Bush did the > > > > > Congress signed on, ergo; they are accomplices and by signing on they > > > > > gave him the " big green light ' and away he go. Not a darn thing > > they > > > > > can do about it except to politicize it. Which anyone with have a > > > > > brain knows is exactly what the Demwits are doing. Duhhhhhh! > > > ******************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > On Jul 16, 7:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > jgg1000a, > > > > > > You're reasoning is exactly why Republicans / Conservatives got > > their > > > > > > asses handed to them in the last election. I agree with you on the > > > > > > issue of this post BUT your comments below are why ConservRepubs > > are > > > > > > about as popular as AIDS. Examples: > > > > > > > "Except using the UNSC's definition of WMD, Saddam had WMD in 2002 > > and > > > > > > 2003..." > > > > > > EXCUSE ME? Would that be the same UN that would not give Bush > > approval > > > > > > to go? The same UN that Bush said does not control and has no > > bearing > > > > > > on the security of the US? Only an idiot would think this had > > anything > > > > > > to do with the UN and guess what? There WERE NO WMD's by anyone's > > > > > > definition. Wonder why only the faithful few bought this line of bs > > in > > > > > > '06 & '08? > > > > > > > "And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was > > not a > > > > > > CIA undercover operative..." > > > > > > Plame was an active operative. Operational cover or no, your > > > > > > rationalization is that this was okay to Conservatives. Wonder why > > all > > > > > > us former military (and in my case, intel services) voters went > > > > > > elsewhere? > > > > > > > "> Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action > > > > > > while it is going through the courts and congress is the proper > > > > > > process... And that is the appropriate course of action..." > > > > > > Wow, and I thought the bullshit couldn't get any deeper. Sorry but > > no, > > > > > > it is not proper to violate the 4th Amendment. IF the 4th Amendment > > > > > > has been changed or legislation has already been passed to make > > > > > > certain cases legal, then fine. But that wasn't the case with Bush. > > He > > > > > > violated the 4th Amendment. Period. No legal right. Wonder why > > voters > > > > > > walked away from a party trying to rationalize this bs? > > > > > > > "> Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia..." > > > > > > You forgot Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Yemen and Libya. Yeah, THAT's the > > > > > > standard we want to hold ourselves to! Conservatives want to make > > sure > > > > > > we're just like the slimiest countries in the world! Great! How'd > > that > > > > > > idea work for ya in the last election? > > > > > > > In case you think otherwise, I have no problem with the GOP or > > > > > > Conservatives. Or Dems or Liberals. But I have HUGE problems with > > > > > > people who will justify anything in the name of Party over Country. > > > > > > The GOP needs an overhaul. The Dems may need one if Pelosi > > continues > > > > > > to open her mouth. And it is the extremists in each that lose all > > of > > > > > > us in the middle. > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 3:28 pm, > > > > > > > > >>> There were no WMD's in Iraq > > > > > > > > >>> Outing a CIA operative is Treason > > > > > > > > And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was > > not a > > > > > > > CIA undercover operative... > > > > > > > > >>> Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > > > > > > Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action > > while > > > > > > > it is going through the courts and congress is the proper > > process... > > > > > > > And that is the appropriate course of action... > > > > > > > > >>> Torturing captives is against US and international Law > > > > > > > > Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia... > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 5:20 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > No what is insanity is the willfully blind ignorance > > > > > > > > of the Bush Apologists. > > > > > > > > > There were no WMD's in Iraq. > > > > > > > > Outing a CIA operative is Treason. > > > > > > > > Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > > > > > > Torturing captives is against US and international Law. > > > > > > > > > And now we may have unsanctioned Hit Squads killing > > > > > > > > Non combatant foreign citizens who gave moral or financial > > > > > > > > support to al qaeda in foreign countries and the Hit Squads > > > > > > > > may have targeted the wrong people! > > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I find no reason to > > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > I do and so did Cheney. > > > > > > > > > > so, the military was given a green light to kill our enemies > > but > > > > not > > > > > > > > > the CIA? > > > > > > > > > that's insanity > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to > > > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their > > > > supporters. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an > > Al > > > > qaeda > > > > > > > > > > > > hit team illegal? > > > > > > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign > > > > > > > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Moonbat2..jpg > > > 60KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
