>"Dick sucking shit eater" That's Barney Frank's nickname in the cloakroom at the House.
On Jul 17, 12:56 pm, Frederick The Moderate <[email protected]> wrote: > lol - well Keith like I said, your bias is pretty evident. In this > very thread (let alone others), Sage loves to call names like morons > Demwits etc... and "The Gall to talk about Bruce" came from little > phrases like "Dick sucking shit eater". But of course when delivered > by anyone whose ideology is not identical to you and Sir Bruce the > Classy, that's nothing compared to what? "Kinda stupid"? Hmm. Very > Palinesque! I get it! It is only the sins of OTHERS that are "crass". > Yes, completely objective. You'll make a fine Conservative or > Republican buddy! Umm hmmm. Absolutely. > You need only start telling others their opinions to complete your > journey down the Dark Side of the Force. ;-) > Pretty funny. > > On Jul 16, 6:12 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Fred, > > > I don't need to know. I was offended by your crass less than polished > > attack on Sage. And you have the gall to talk about Bruce??? > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > LOL Very funny Keith. Um, do you even know my position on the issue of > > > this thread? > > > > On Jul 16, 6:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Sage: > > > > > Look, three things are becoming obvious: > > > > > 1. You drink the extreme right kool-aid. Fine. Bush never did ANYTHING > > > > > wrong! Oh nooooo. You betcha ;-) He was a great president and that's > > > > > why they used him so much during the campaign rofl. > > > > > 2. You're kinda stupid. Well that's okay too. This would explain your > > > > > love of Bush, Palin and inability to comprehend that I never said > > > > > Bush's war was illegal. I said the soldier in 2006 made that > > > > > contention. So fine. This would also help explain why you're so apt to > > > > > believe what the GOP has told you to and follow blindly like a good > > > > > little sheeple. > > > > > 3. There are people here who are actually worth reading. Then there's > > > > > people who use phrases like "idiotic boobery". lol. That's you. Well, > > > > > that's fine. So, you're easily upset and prone to tantrums & insults. > > > > > (have you EVER posted or replied without insulting someone?). Who > > > > > knows, you might be low on meds... Well that's just oooookay now. I'm > > > > > sure you are a swell and special person. God loves you. It will all be > > > > > okay. Just breathe deeply and feel the good in the universe. Let out > > > > > some of that negativity. Eat some bran flakes or something. > > > > > People who can engage in intelligent and civil discourse have been > > > > > source of new insights and perspectives for me. Idiotic boobery > > > > > (really, thanks for that!) types never offer anything of substance, > > > > > anything of value or anything that will be seriously considered by > > > > > anyone who doesn't already share their point of view. They're not > > > > > worth responding to, are they? > > > > > > On Jul 16, 5:37 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Mod-man, > > > > > > > If Bush had broken any laws the libs would have proved > > > > > > their case by now and impeached him. Unfortunately neither you nor > > > the > > > > > > libs can provide the silver bullet. Can you?! Put up, or as they > > > > > > say > > > > > > " shut up". Conspiracy theory, Bush derangement syndrome, and > > > hearsay > > > > > > does not a CASE make. You think the Republicans took a fall, wait > > > till > > > > > > the 2010 elections. Any way you spin it, whatever Bush did the > > > > > > Congress signed on, ergo; they are accomplices and by signing on > > > > > > they > > > > > > gave him the " big green light ' and away he go. Not a darn thing > > > they > > > > > > can do about it except to politicize it. Which anyone with have a > > > > > > brain knows is exactly what the Demwits are doing. Duhhhhhh! > > > > ******************************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 7:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > jgg1000a, > > > > > > > You're reasoning is exactly why Republicans / Conservatives got > > > their > > > > > > > asses handed to them in the last election. I agree with you on the > > > > > > > issue of this post BUT your comments below are why ConservRepubs > > > are > > > > > > > about as popular as AIDS. Examples: > > > > > > > > "Except using the UNSC's definition of WMD, Saddam had WMD in 2002 > > > and > > > > > > > 2003..." > > > > > > > EXCUSE ME? Would that be the same UN that would not give Bush > > > approval > > > > > > > to go? The same UN that Bush said does not control and has no > > > bearing > > > > > > > on the security of the US? Only an idiot would think this had > > > anything > > > > > > > to do with the UN and guess what? There WERE NO WMD's by anyone's > > > > > > > definition. Wonder why only the faithful few bought this line of > > > > > > > bs > > > in > > > > > > > '06 & '08? > > > > > > > > "And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was > > > not a > > > > > > > CIA undercover operative..." > > > > > > > Plame was an active operative. Operational cover or no, your > > > > > > > rationalization is that this was okay to Conservatives. Wonder why > > > all > > > > > > > us former military (and in my case, intel services) voters went > > > > > > > elsewhere? > > > > > > > > "> Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action > > > > > > > while it is going through the courts and congress is the proper > > > > > > > process... And that is the appropriate course of action..." > > > > > > > Wow, and I thought the bullshit couldn't get any deeper. Sorry but > > > no, > > > > > > > it is not proper to violate the 4th Amendment. IF the 4th > > > > > > > Amendment > > > > > > > has been changed or legislation has already been passed to make > > > > > > > certain cases legal, then fine. But that wasn't the case with > > > > > > > Bush. > > > He > > > > > > > violated the 4th Amendment. Period. No legal right. Wonder why > > > voters > > > > > > > walked away from a party trying to rationalize this bs? > > > > > > > > "> Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia..." > > > > > > > You forgot Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Yemen and Libya. Yeah, THAT's the > > > > > > > standard we want to hold ourselves to! Conservatives want to make > > > sure > > > > > > > we're just like the slimiest countries in the world! Great! How'd > > > that > > > > > > > idea work for ya in the last election? > > > > > > > > In case you think otherwise, I have no problem with the GOP or > > > > > > > Conservatives. Or Dems or Liberals. But I have HUGE problems with > > > > > > > people who will justify anything in the name of Party over > > > > > > > Country. > > > > > > > The GOP needs an overhaul. The Dems may need one if Pelosi > > > continues > > > > > > > to open her mouth. And it is the extremists in each that lose all > > > of > > > > > > > us in the middle. > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 3:28 pm, > > > > > > > > > >>> There were no WMD's in Iraq > > > > > > > > > >>> Outing a CIA operative is Treason > > > > > > > > > And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was > > > not a > > > > > > > > CIA undercover operative... > > > > > > > > > >>> Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > > > > > > > Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action > > > while > > > > > > > > it is going through the courts and congress is the proper > > > process... > > > > > > > > And that is the appropriate course of action... > > > > > > > > > >>> Torturing captives is against US and international Law > > > > > > > > > Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia... > > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 5:20 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > No what is insanity is the willfully blind ignorance > > > > > > > > > of the Bush Apologists. > > > > > > > > > > There were no WMD's in Iraq. > > > > > > > > > Outing a CIA operative is Treason. > > > > > > > > > Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > > > > > > > Torturing captives is against US and international Law. > > > > > > > > > > And now we may have unsanctioned Hit Squads killing > > > > > > > > > Non combatant foreign citizens who gave moral or financial > > > > > > > > > support to al qaeda in foreign countries and the Hit Squads > > > > > > > > > may have targeted the wrong people! > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I find no reason to > > > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > I do and so did Cheney. > > > > > > > > > > > so, the military was given a green light to kill our > > > > > > > > > > enemies > > > but > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > the CIA? > > > > > > > > > > that's insanity > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to > > > > > > > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > > > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their > > > > > supporters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make > > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > Al > > > > > qaeda > > > > > > > > > > > > > hit team illegal? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
