LOL, Gee Fred, my opinion of you went up considerably. Not because you agreed with me, but because you seem to be your own man....
On Jul 16, 7:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate <[email protected]> wrote: > jgg1000a, > You're reasoning is exactly why Republicans / Conservatives got their > asses handed to them in the last election. I agree with you on the > issue of this post BUT your comments below are why ConservRepubs are > about as popular as AIDS. Examples: > > "Except using the UNSC's definition of WMD, Saddam had WMD in 2002 and > 2003..." > EXCUSE ME? Would that be the same UN that would not give Bush approval > to go? The same UN that Bush said does not control and has no bearing > on the security of the US? Only an idiot would think this had anything > to do with the UN and guess what? There WERE NO WMD's by anyone's > definition. Wonder why only the faithful few bought this line of bs in > '06 & '08? > > "And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was not a > CIA undercover operative..." > Plame was an active operative. Operational cover or no, your > rationalization is that this was okay to Conservatives. Wonder why all > us former military (and in my case, intel services) voters went > elsewhere? > > "> Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action > while it is going through the courts and congress is the proper > process... And that is the appropriate course of action..." > Wow, and I thought the bullshit couldn't get any deeper. Sorry but no, > it is not proper to violate the 4th Amendment. IF the 4th Amendment > has been changed or legislation has already been passed to make > certain cases legal, then fine. But that wasn't the case with Bush. He > violated the 4th Amendment. Period. No legal right. Wonder why voters > walked away from a party trying to rationalize this bs? > > "> Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia..." > You forgot Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Yemen and Libya. Yeah, THAT's the > standard we want to hold ourselves to! Conservatives want to make sure > we're just like the slimiest countries in the world! Great! How'd that > idea work for ya in the last election? > > In case you think otherwise, I have no problem with the GOP or > Conservatives. Or Dems or Liberals. But I have HUGE problems with > people who will justify anything in the name of Party over Country. > The GOP needs an overhaul. The Dems may need one if Pelosi continues > to open her mouth. And it is the extremists in each that lose all of > us in the middle. > > > > On Jul 16, 3:28 pm, > > > >>> There were no WMD's in Iraq > > > >>> Outing a CIA operative is Treason > > > And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was not a > > CIA undercover operative... > > > >>> Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action while > > it is going through the courts and congress is the proper process... > > And that is the appropriate course of action... > > > >>> Torturing captives is against US and international Law > > > Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia... > > > On Jul 16, 5:20 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > No what is insanity is the willfully blind ignorance > > > of the Bush Apologists. > > > > There were no WMD's in Iraq. > > > Outing a CIA operative is Treason. > > > Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal. > > > Torturing captives is against US and international Law. > > > > And now we may have unsanctioned Hit Squads killing > > > Non combatant foreign citizens who gave moral or financial > > > support to al qaeda in foreign countries and the Hit Squads > > > may have targeted the wrong people! > > > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > I find no reason to > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > --- > > > > I do and so did Cheney. > > > > > so, the military was given a green light to kill our enemies but not > > > > the CIA? > > > > that's insanity > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches. > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their supporters. > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al qaeda > > > > > > > hit team illegal? > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign > > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda? > > > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
