Mod-man,
If Bush had broken any laws the libs would have proved
their case by now and impeached him. Unfortunately neither you nor the
libs can provide the silver bullet. Can you?! Put up, or as they say
" shut up". Conspiracy theory, Bush derangement syndrome, and hearsay
does not a CASE make. You think the Republicans took a fall, wait till
the 2010 elections. Any way you spin it, whatever Bush did the
Congress signed on, ergo; they are accomplices and by signing on they
gave him the " big green light ' and away he go. Not a darn thing they
can do about it except to politicize it. Which anyone with have a
brain knows is exactly what the Demwits are doing. Duhhhhhh!
********************************************************************************************************************************************
On Jul 16, 7:20 pm, Frederick The Moderate
<[email protected]> wrote:
> jgg1000a,
> You're reasoning is exactly why Republicans / Conservatives got their
> asses handed to them in the last election. I agree with you on the
> issue of this post BUT your comments below are why ConservRepubs are
> about as popular as AIDS. Examples:
>
> "Except using the UNSC's definition of WMD, Saddam had WMD in 2002 and
> 2003..."
> EXCUSE ME? Would that be the same UN that would not give Bush approval
> to go? The same UN that Bush said does not control and has no bearing
> on the security of the US? Only an idiot would think this had anything
> to do with the UN and guess what? There WERE NO WMD's by anyone's
> definition. Wonder why only the faithful few bought this line of bs in
> '06 & '08?
>
> "And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was not a
> CIA undercover operative..."
> Plame was an active operative. Operational cover or no, your
> rationalization is that this was okay to Conservatives. Wonder why all
> us former military (and in my case, intel services) voters went
> elsewhere?
>
> "> Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action
> while it is going through the courts and congress is the proper
> process... And that is the appropriate course of action..."
> Wow, and I thought the bullshit couldn't get any deeper. Sorry but no,
> it is not proper to violate the 4th Amendment. IF the 4th Amendment
> has been changed or legislation has already been passed to make
> certain cases legal, then fine. But that wasn't the case with Bush. He
> violated the 4th Amendment. Period. No legal right. Wonder why voters
> walked away from a party trying to rationalize this bs?
>
> "> Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia..."
> You forgot Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Yemen and Libya. Yeah, THAT's the
> standard we want to hold ourselves to! Conservatives want to make sure
> we're just like the slimiest countries in the world! Great! How'd that
> idea work for ya in the last election?
>
> In case you think otherwise, I have no problem with the GOP or
> Conservatives. Or Dems or Liberals. But I have HUGE problems with
> people who will justify anything in the name of Party over Country.
> The GOP needs an overhaul. The Dems may need one if Pelosi continues
> to open her mouth. And it is the extremists in each that lose all of
> us in the middle.
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 3:28 pm,
>
>
>
> > >>> There were no WMD's in Iraq
>
> > >>> Outing a CIA operative is Treason
>
> > And outing a CIA program is not by your thinking... Plame was not a
> > CIA undercover operative...
>
> > >>> Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal.
>
> > Except when approved by the courts... Doing a course of action while
> > it is going through the courts and congress is the proper process...
> > And that is the appropriate course of action...
>
> > >>> Torturing captives is against US and international Law
>
> > Define Torture and then apply it to China and Russia...
>
> > On Jul 16, 5:20 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > No what is insanity is the willfully blind ignorance
> > > of the Bush Apologists.
>
> > > There were no WMD's in Iraq.
> > > Outing a CIA operative is Treason.
> > > Spying on US Citizens in the US is illegal.
> > > Torturing captives is against US and international Law.
>
> > > And now we may have unsanctioned Hit Squads killing
> > > Non combatant foreign citizens who gave moral or financial
> > > support to al qaeda in foreign countries and the Hit Squads
> > > may have targeted the wrong people!
>
> > > On Jul 16, 10:03 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I find no reason to
> > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
> > > > ---
> > > > I do and so did Cheney.
>
> > > > so, the military was given a green light to kill our enemies but not
> > > > the CIA?
> > > > that's insanity
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 7:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to
> > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
>
> > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches.
>
> > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their supporters.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al qaeda
> > > > > > > hit team illegal?
>
> > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign
> > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda?
>
> > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
