Is a German consular office not considered German soil, as embassies are? No matter. The happenstance of you escaping into this world on US soil makes you in no way an American, regardless of technicalities or your own delusions. So now you're in Costa Rica. Many criminals and fugitives end up there. I'm sure you consort with the lowest of them, being of their sort. Somewhere along the sordid path of your life you have come to believe that the US is the big problem in the world and you have a quite obvious envy and jealousy of this country. Is it the stomping down of your Nazi forefathers that bothers you? Were you treated as a Miss Petty Officer in the Navy and forced to service the men? Exactly what is the genesis of your hatred, Herr Bullshit?
On Jul 19, 12:49 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > See, honesty does not work with the obviously ignorant and US educated (read > indocrinateda) flag waver.I was literally and legally born in two countries > , Germany and the US. I was born in a german consulare office in trhe US of > German parents (my father was the consul) I was a citizen of both when my > little head first popped out. > > I served in the US Navy as and was discharged as a Petty Officer (MM3) and > was in the German Army immediately on my discharge from the US Navy. I hold > two PhDs. > > I was awarded Costa Rican citizenship for the work I did in the Central > American theater in the 80's. > > Just what have you wasted your life on. > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Coward. I couldn't care less about your various documents. I'm an > > American. I'm proud of my country. You are a snake. You hide in > > deception and commit to nothing. You are the worst sort. I feel sorry > > for whatever place you currently infest. > > > On Jul 19, 12:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh, the reason your question was left un answered was simple ... its very > > > form is wrong. It was asked in the singular. > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Still unwilling to reveal the canker sore of a nation that spawned > > > > you, I see. I don't blame you. Why saddle them with that burden? > > > > > It really kills you that you don't measure up to us, doesn't it? It > > > > kills you even more that we know it too. Don't worry, Bunky, we'll > > > > still save your ass when the chips are down. > > > > > On Jul 19, 12:08 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > and losing ground faster than Zimbabwe in the 90's thanks to > > attitudes > > > > just > > > > > like that. "Say it ain't so, Joe, say it ain't so!!!!" > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Only me? LOL! There are plenty of people who realize that the US is > > > > > > the pre-eminent nation in the world. Superior to all, in every way. > > > > > > Especially whatever sink hole you hail from. > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 10:59 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > They weren't there either.... seems no one can find any evidence > > as > > > > to > > > > > > why > > > > > > > the US invaded... only you seem to find that odd or out of US > > > > character. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Have you checked up your ass? > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 10:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > AND WE ARE ALL STILL WAITING TO SEE THEM.... where are they > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Zebnick <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > How the hell do YOU know how "tight" the formations were or > > > > were > > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE stop this inane pretending that you know more about > > > > tactics > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > strategy than our generals because you were "in the > > service." > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > > >Our invasion was honestly about WMDs. > > > > > > > > > > > You starting to make me think that you're a teenager on the > > > > bosses > > > > > > > > > > computer in the office between your shift as fry cook at > > > > McDonalds. > > > > > > > > > > Were you in a coma in the year prior to the Iraq war? It > > sounds > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > I can understand "moderates" disagreeing with the invasion > > of > > > > Iraq > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > any number of grounds. But you spout the whacko leftie lies > > > > like a > > > > > > > > > > good little commrade. Stop pretending. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 7:08 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > "> We thought he had poison gas. Our soldiers were > > equipped > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > confront > > > > > > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Everybody thought he had WMDs, mostly because he not > > only > > > > HAD > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > because he used them against his enemies." > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone who's been through basic strategic training knows > > that > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > don't go into Iraq with divisions in tight formations (as > > we > > > > did) > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > > you think the enemy has WMD's (at least not ones that are > > > > still > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > > good - we knew the ones WE gave thme were no longer a > > > > threat). > > > > > > > > > > > But okay I get it. You guys really want to believe a > > certain > > > > way > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > that's fine. I can understand not wanting to believe that > > > > your > > > > > > > > leaders > > > > > > > > > > > had motives other than those publicly stated. So fine. > > Bush > > > > never > > > > > > > > lied > > > > > > > > > > > or spun a thing. Our invasion was honestly about WMDs. > > And > > > > our > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > for the Iraqi people who needed Liberation. Because the > > role > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > American government is to ust invade anyone country that > > > > isn't > > > > > > nice. > > > > > > > > > > > Besides, according to those same leaders, the Iraqis > > would > > > > > > welcome us > > > > > > > > > > > with open arms. > > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing else, I can understand your wanting to believe > > the > > > > way > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > do. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 11:07 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in the > > way we > > > > > > did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a nuclear > > nation > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, they were. Iraq had completed construction of > > a > > > > > > nuclear > > > > > > > > > > > > reactor (That makes you a nuclear nation state) but > > Israel > > > > > > > > immediately > > > > > > > > > > > > blew it up. (Thank you Israel). > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people would say that a leader who builds a > > nuclear > > > > > > reactor > > > > > > > > > > > > despite worldwide protests and has and uses poison gas > > on > > > > > > > > neighboring > > > > > > > > > > > > countries and his own people was a dangerous guy. Other > > > > people > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > deluding themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 1:42 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in the > > way > > > > we > > > > > > did. > > > > > > > > > > Large, > > > > > > > > > > > > > tight formations are easy targets and we know that. > > Not > > > > to > > > > > > > > mention > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we would have sent a least one division to sweep > > and > > > > > > search > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > area where we "knew" the WMD's were for residual (or > > any > > > > > > other) > > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence they ever existed. We never did. Not one > > peek. > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > former > > > > > > > > > > > > > navy intel and i can assure you, even though Bush > > screwed > > > > our > > > > > > > > Humint > > > > > > > > > > > > > network fro some time to come, we still would have > > been > > > > able > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence - if believed it was ever there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I get it. You really, really, really want to > > believe > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > > > > WMD's there. Okay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a nuclear > > > > nation > > > > > > state > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, if you really want to believe it is or was, > > okay > > > > > > dokey. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Talk about wanting to believe lies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've lost five friends in Iraq. All of them Psy-Ops > > and a > > > > > > couple > > > > > > > > > > Force > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recon. They've made it clear for years that Iraq will > > > > never > > > > > > > > > > appreciate > > > > > > > > > > > > > what we've done and no matter how long we're there, > > > > they'll > > > > > > > > regress > > > > > > > > > > > > > shortly after we leave. Two thousand years of > > culture. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq has already made clear they view US as outsiders > > and > > > > > > went > > > > > > > > out of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the way to spit in Bush's face before he could get > > out of > > > > > > office. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > > > > you believe what you want to believe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 7:23 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> We also had the certainty that there really > > were no > > > > > > WMD's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not true. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Urban warfare, their commitment to keep > > fighting > > > > people > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > viewed as invaders, and the complete lack of any kind of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exit strategy, created a no-win situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once again you show little understanding... Both > > AQ > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Americans are outsiders... As is the harsh form > > of > > > > > > Radical > > > > > > > > > > Islam... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As is the lowland Pakistani... The question here > > is > > > > not > > > > > > > > fighting > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outsider BUT WHICH OUTSIDER... The exit strategy? > > > > > > Stability > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > non Radical Islamic government in a nuclear > > > > nation-state... > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
