On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Is a German consular office not considered German soil, as embassies
> are?


Yes.


> No matter.



> So very sorry you are wrong as you do not list the exceptions...



> The happenstance of you escaping into this world on US
> soil makes you in no way an American,


which type of American are you talking about?? there are two continents and
over thirty countries that are American.


> regardless of technicalities or
> your own delusions.


It ,makes me just as Gringo as you.


> So now you're in Costa Rica. Many criminals and
> fugitives end up there. I'm sure you consort with the lowest of them,
> being of their sort.


No where near as many as you home grow.


> Somewhere along the sordid path of your life you
> have come to believe that the US is the big problem in the world


and they bhave and continue to create the problems themselves.


> and
> you have a quite obvious envy and jealousy of this country.


None whatsoever. If I have anything it is disappointment. You could easily
be so much more yet prefer to wallow.


> Is it the
> stomping down of your Nazi forefathers that bothers you?


Hardly, many of their policies and attitudes are glowing brilliantly in your
government and populace.


> Were you
> treated as a Miss Petty Officer in the Navy and forced to service the
> men?


Actually, I had a wonderful time. Truly fluent bi-lingual white men were and
still are an extreme rarity in the US and the military knew my value.


> Exactly what is the genesis of your hatred, Herr Bullshit?


As I said, it is disappointment... your attitude as displayed is one of the
root causes for the failings in Gringolandia but it's OK, ignorance can be
forgiven.

>
>
> On Jul 19, 12:49 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > See, honesty does not work with the obviously ignorant and US educated
> (read
> > indocrinateda) flag waver.I was literally and legally born in two
> countries
> > , Germany and the US. I was born in a german consulare office in trhe US
> of
> > German parents (my father was the consul) I was a citizen of both when my
> > little head first popped out.
> >
> > I served in the US Navy as and was discharged as a Petty Officer (MM3)
> and
> > was in the German Army immediately on my discharge from the US Navy. I
> hold
> > two PhDs.
> >
> > I was awarded Costa Rican citizenship for the work I did in the Central
> > American theater in the 80's.
> >
> > Just what have you wasted your life on.
> >
>  > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Coward. I couldn't care less about your various documents. I'm an
> > > American. I'm proud of my country. You are a snake. You hide in
> > > deception and commit to nothing. You are the worst sort. I feel sorry
> > > for whatever place you currently infest.
> >
> > > On Jul 19, 12:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Oh, the reason your question was left un answered was simple ... its
> very
> > > > form is wrong. It was asked in the singular.
> >
> > >  > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Still unwilling to reveal the canker sore of a nation that spawned
> > > > > you, I see. I don't blame you. Why saddle them with that burden?
> >
> > > > > It really kills you that you don't measure up to us, doesn't it? It
> > > > > kills you even more that we know it too. Don't worry, Bunky, we'll
> > > > > still save your ass when the chips are down.
> >
> > > > > On Jul 19, 12:08 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > and losing ground faster than Zimbabwe in the 90's thanks to
> > > attitudes
> > > > > just
> > > > > > like that. "Say it ain't so, Joe, say it ain't so!!!!"
> >
> > > > >  > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Only me? LOL! There are plenty of people who realize that the
> US is
> > > > > > > the pre-eminent nation in the world. Superior to all, in every
> way.
> > > > > > > Especially whatever sink hole you hail from.
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 18, 10:59 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > They weren't there either.... seems no one can find any
> evidence
> > > as
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > the US invaded... only you seem to find that odd or out of US
> > > > > character.
> >
> > > > > > >  > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Have you checked up your ass?
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 10:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > AND WE ARE ALL STILL WAITING TO SEE THEM.... where are
> they
> > > ??
> >
> > > > > > > > >  > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Zebnick <
> [email protected]
> >
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > How the hell do YOU know how "tight" the formations
> were or
> > > > > were
> > > > > > > not.
> > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE stop this inane pretending that you know more
> about
> > > > > tactics
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > strategy than our generals because you were "in the
> > > service."
> > > > > LOL!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >Our invasion was honestly about WMDs.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > You starting to make me think that you're a teenager on
> the
> > > > > bosses
> > > > > > > > > > > computer in the office between your shift as fry cook
> at
> > > > > McDonalds.
> > > > > > > > > > > Were you in a coma in the year prior to the Iraq war?
> It
> > > sounds
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can understand "moderates" disagreeing with the
> invasion
> > > of
> > > > > Iraq
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > any number of grounds. But you spout the whacko leftie
> lies
> > > > > like a
> > > > > > > > > > > good little commrade. Stop pretending.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 7:08 pm, Frederick The Moderate
> > > > > > > > > > >  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > "> We thought he had poison gas. Our soldiers were
> > > equipped
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > confront
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Everybody thought he had WMDs, mostly because he
> not
> > > only
> > > > > HAD
> > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > because he used them against his enemies."
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone who's been through basic strategic training
> knows
> > > that
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > don't go into Iraq with divisions in tight formations
> (as
> > > we
> > > > > did)
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > > > > you think the enemy has WMD's (at least not ones that
> are
> > > > > still
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > good - we knew the ones WE gave thme were no longer a
> > > > > threat).
> > > > > > > > > > > > But okay I get it. You guys really want to believe a
> > > certain
> > > > > way
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > that's fine. I can understand not wanting to believe
> that
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > leaders
> > > > > > > > > > > > had motives other than those publicly stated. So
> fine.
> > > Bush
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > lied
> > > > > > > > > > > > or spun a thing. Our invasion was honestly about
> WMDs.
> > > And
> > > > > our
> > > > > > > love
> > > > > > > > > > > > for the Iraqi people who needed Liberation. Because
> the
> > > role
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > American government is to ust invade anyone country
> that
> > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > nice.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Besides, according to those same leaders, the Iraqis
> > > would
> > > > > > > welcome us
> > > > > > > > > > > > with open arms.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If nothing else, I can understand your wanting to
> believe
> > > the
> > > > > way
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > do.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 11:07 am, Zebnick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in
> the
> > > way we
> > > > > > > did.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a nuclear
> > > nation
> > > > > > > state
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, they were. Iraq had completed
> construction of
> > > a
> > > > > > > nuclear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reactor (That makes you a nuclear nation state) but
> > > Israel
> > > > > > > > > immediately
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blew it up. (Thank you Israel).
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people would say that a leader who builds a
> > > nuclear
> > > > > > > reactor
> > > > > > > > > > > > > despite worldwide protests and has and uses poison
> gas
> > > on
> > > > > > > > > neighboring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > countries and his own people was a dangerous guy.
> Other
> > > > > people
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > deluding themselves.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 1:42 pm, Frederick The Moderate
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in
> the
> > > way
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > did.
> > > > > > > > > > > Large,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > tight formations are easy targets and we know
> that.
> > > Not
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > mention
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we would have sent a least one division to
> sweep
> > > and
> > > > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > area where we "knew" the WMD's were for residual
> (or
> > > any
> > > > > > > other)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence they ever existed. We never did. Not one
> > > peek.
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > former
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > navy intel and i can assure you, even though Bush
> > > screwed
> > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > Humint
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > network fro some time to come, we still would
> have
> > > been
> > > > > able
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence - if believed it was ever there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I get it. You really, really, really want to
> > > believe
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > WMD's there. Okay.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a
> nuclear
> > > > > nation
> > > > > > > state
> > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, if you really want to believe it is or
> was,
> > > okay
> > > > > > > dokey.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Talk about wanting to believe lies.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've lost five friends in Iraq. All of them
> Psy-Ops
> > > and a
> > > > > > > couple
> > > > > > > > > > > Force
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recon. They've made it clear for years that Iraq
> will
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > what we've done and no matter how long we're
> there,
> > > > > they'll
> > > > > > > > > regress
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shortly after we leave. Two thousand years of
> > > culture.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq has already made clear they view US as
> outsiders
> > > and
> > > > > > > went
> > > > > > > > > out of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the way to spit in Bush's face before he could
> get
> > > out of
> > > > > > > office.
> > > > > > > > > But
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you believe what you want to believe.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 18, 7:23 am, jgg1000a <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> We also had the certainty that there really
> > > were no
> > > > > > > WMD's
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not true.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Urban warfare, their commitment to keep
> > > fighting
> > > > > people
> > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > viewed as invaders, and the complete lack of any kind
> of
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exit strategy, created a no-win situation.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once again you show little understanding...
> Both
> > > AQ
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Americans are outsiders...   As is the harsh
> form
> > > of
> > > > > > > Radical
> > > > > > > > > > > Islam...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As is the lowland Pakistani...   The question
> here
> > > is
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > fighting
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outsider BUT WHICH OUTSIDER...   The exit
> strategy?
> > > > > > >  Stability
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > non Radical Islamic government in a nuclear
> > > > > nation-state...
> >
>  > ...
> >
> > read more ยป
> >
>


-- 
Mark M. Kahle,  ,
www.filacoffee.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to