Got this posting from Jim Miller.  He expresses the point I have been 
trying to make the Holly if I can get past his failure to interpret what 
is actually being said.



        
        



*Barack Obama Will Make A Campaign Speech To School Kids Next Week:  * 
Michael and Diane Medved are not pleased 
<http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelMedved/2009/09/02/abusing_school_kids_with_pro-obama_propaganda?page=full>.
 


    My wife Diane seldom gets upset about politics.  But President
    Barack Obama's recent demonstration of megalomania in insisting on
    beginning the school year by simultaneously addressing all public
    school kids in the United States elicited a concise response:  "it's
    sick."

    In addition to her Ph.D. in psychology, Diane holds an M.A. in
    Education, and both primary and secondary teaching credentials in
    California.  She has raised and educated our three kids, each of
    whom received some combination of home schooling, parochial
    education, and public schools.  What bothers her (and many
    courageous teachers across the country) is the crude attempt by the
    Department of Education and the White House to blur all distinctions
    between education and cult-of-personality propaganda. 

How do I know it's a campaign speech, since I haven't read it?  By 
reading the lesson plan 
<http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10582301/President-Obama%E2%80%99s-Address-to-Students-Across-America-September-8-2009>.
 
 The worst part of the plan is one of the things the students may be 
asked to do after the speech:

    Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the
    president.  These would be collected and redistributed at an
    appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable
    to their goals. 

It is legitimate to ask students what they can do to help the country. 
 It is not legitimate --- in a republic --- to ask students what they 
can do to help a particular leader.

(One thing Obama's team seems to have missed:  This speech to school 
kids will provide a great straight line for many comedians, and some of 
those comedians will accept Obama's offer.  If you think of a good one, 
or hear a good one, let me know about it.)
- 2:49 PM, 2 September 2009
*The White House* is "clarifying" 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/02/wh-withdraws-call-students-help-obama/>
 
the language in the lesson plan, presumably in order to remove the more 
political parts.  Most likely, Obama's speech will just be an 
interruption of school time, not a full-blown campaign speech.

For amusement, you may want to read about reactions from Democratic 
leaders in 1991, when President George H. W. Bush made a speech from a 
school 
<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/09/03/flashback-1991-gephardt-called-bushs-speech-students-paid-political-a>.

A few conservatives have said that they would keep their kids out of 
school during Obama's speech.   That's silly in my opinion; if there is 
anything offensive in the speech, it is better to explain that to kids 
after they hear it.
- 11:04 AM, 3 September 2009   [link] 
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/September2009_1.html#jrm7790>



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to