Quite simply put.... every where else the Mongols conquered they placed troops to occupy and hold the lands.... they took their due in taxes by doing so.
For your position to be more correct than mine you would need demonstrate an iota of evidence that said army did more than simply pass through killing as they went.... there is no evidence of the Mongol leaving anything more than scorched earth on their path. There is no documentation that the effort leave a taxpaying infrastructure as done in all other conquered lands was even considered. There is no evidence that the Mongol Army because of its magnitude (tracks still appear as a trail on satellite imagery) did more than take a direct route to somewhere else. It was simple policy to destroy that which could not be held or that which was undesirable There are just so many traversable mountain passes that are great enough to ride and walk an Army through. So for all practical purposes they did go around. There is NO evidence that they busied themselves with the four corners of this area as they did with all others as YOUR argument suggests. The vast majority, for lack of any other evidence, was left to itself. ALL, that would be each and every one, of your supposed invasions were all done by what would be considered a local.... Your one attempt at correctness lists Timurid who by that time was also a Muslim...... and a local regardless of bloodline. On 12/5/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > Once again you spin history... You said at first > >>>> The largest and most fierce army ever assembled had the good sense to >>>> "go around" because the leader KNEW that this was a people so > religiously, tribally and economically split that "he could take yet > never hold" this land.. > > Now you say > >>>> No, I got it right..... The shah or caliph was a despotic man who ruled >>>> by the bloody sword. > > Then came the Mongols who destroyed and left it to the ghosts... they > did NOT occupy. > > Which is it, "go around" or "left it to the ghosts"??? Let me > instruct > > Timorlame came from just to the North of Afghanistan (Turkish non > Pashtun tribes) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Timurid_Dynasty_821_-_873_%28AD%29.PNG > > Or what about the Mughal Empire which was Afghani Tribes invading > India (1526-1856)??? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire > > Or ths Sultans of Delhi (1206-1526)??? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan_of_Delhi > > Or the Sakis and other pre-Islamic invaders who settled in Afghanistan > and to raid the lowlands... The point is your claim that "Just as > no outside army has ever been able to do." is simplely not true... > Tribes have routinely invaded, conquered, and settled in parts of > Afghanistan and the tribe of Afghanistan have routinely invaded > neighbors... > > Now what is true that post Mughal Empire, no one has invaded and > conquered... But that is only the last 150 years... Those who have > controlled Afghanistan have been strong brutal rulers... > > On Dec 5, 1:05 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, I got it right..... The shah or caliph was a despotic man who >> ruled by the bloody sword. >> >> Then came the Mongols who destroyed and left it to the ghosts... they >> did NOT occupy. Just as no outside army has ever been able to do. Why >> ?? Because of the tribal/religious/economic rift that has always been >> Afghanistan. >> >> Afghanistan has always reverted to its core when left alone and the >> only times in it history that is seemingly at peace is when everyone >> is ignoring what happens within its borders. >> >> Leave the Afghans to their own butchery... just close off the drug and >> arms trade to them and allow no international flights/travel to anyone >> with an Afghan passport. >> >> On 12/5/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Study your history Mark again... The Mongols invade Afghanistan >> > ( then part of the Khwarazmian Empire) in 1219 -1221.... It was the >> > Mongol destruction of Afghanistan which turned Afghanistan into such a >> > lawless tribal area (and not for the first or last time)... >> >> >http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... >> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_India >> >> >http://historymedren.about.com/library/text/bltxtafghan5.htm >> >> >http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/mongols.htm >> >> >>>> On the eastern borders of the Khwarizm Empire a Mongol chieftain by >> >>>> the >> >>>> name of Temujin, later entitled Genghis Khan, was busily >> >>>> consolidating >> >>>> his power. From him the Khwarizm Shah received the following note: "I >> >>>> am >> >>>> the sovereign of the sun-rise, and thou the sovereign of the sun-set. >> >>>> Let there be between us a firm treaty of friendship, amity, and peace >> >>>> and let traders and caravans on both sides come and go, and let the >> >>>> precious products and ordinary commodities which may be in my >> >>>> territory >> >>>> be con-veyed by them into thine, and those in thine into mine." With >> >>>> the >> >>>> notebearer he sent five hundred camels laden with gold, including a >> >>>> nugget of pure gold as big as a camel's neck, silver, silks, furs, >> >>>> sable >> >>>> and other "elegant and ingenious" rarities (Juzjani). >> >> > Such riches were just too tempting for the Shah's avaricious bor-der >> > commander. He seized the treasure and, in an attempt to pre-vent news >> > of his perfidious act from reaching the ears of the Khan, killed all >> > those accompanying the caravan. Or so he thought. He had in fact >> > missed one young camel boy who, taking a steam bath, succeeded in >> > escaping through the chimney to return with the fateful news to his >> > master. Furious, Genghis Khan demanded that the Shah turn over the >> > border commander for punishment but the Shah, sublimely confident of >> > his supreme power, answered by returning the Khan's messengers with >> > singed beards. Insult having thus been added to theft and murder, the >> > flood gates opened for one of the most catastrophic episodes recorded >> > in the annals of mankind. >> >> > Two hundred thousand Mongols marched west to chastise the Khwarizm >> > Shah in the year 1219. By 1221 Balkh, Herat, the Seistan, Ghazni, >> > Bamiyan and all points in between had fallen before the onslaught and >> > " . . . with one stroke a world which billowed with fertility was laid >> > desolate, and the regions thereof became a desert and the greater part >> > of the living dead and their skins and bones crumbling dust; and the >> > mighty were humbled and immersed in the calamities of perdition." So >> > says Juvaini, an eloquent eye-witness chronicler writing only thirty >> > years later. The ruined citadel of the Shansabani capital in Bamiyan >> > is a poignant, visual monument to the presence of Genghis Khan in >> > Afghanistan. Its name, Shahr-i-Gholghola, "City of Noise," refers to >> > the tumult of that final massacre during which the conqueror fulfilled >> > a vow to kill every man, woman and child, every animal and plant in >> > the valley of Bamiyan. >> >> > Recovery was slow. The great irrigation works which had en-abled this >> > land to produce an abundance lay broken and useless, purposely >> > destroyed by Genghis Khan; anarchy so frightened traders that they >> > turned to the sea, and the great cities of the desert and the plain, >> > robbed of their livelihood, became mounds of sand. Only in the rich >> > province of Khurasan was there a return to law and order under an >> > extremely skillful local family, known as the Karts. Appointed >> > Governors by the Mongol Il-Khans of Persia in 1245, they expanded from >> > their capital at Herat to include Kandahar (1281), prominent since the >> > destruction of Bost by Alauddin Ghori, within their realm. When, >> > therefore, they de-clared their independence in 1332 they seemed well >> > on their way toward a long and prosperous reign. The huge bronze >> > cauldron in the courtyard of the great mosque in Herat is a stunning >> > ex-ample of their sophisticated tastes. A new storm was, however, >> > already brewing in Central Asia. >> >> > On Dec 4, 10:07 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The largest and most fierce army ever assembled had the good sense to >> >> "go around" because the leader KNEW that this was a people so >> >> religiously, tribally and economically split that "he could take yet >> >> never hold" this land.. >> >> >> That would be Genghis Khan and he was an expert at uniting tribes... >> >> >> On 12/4/09, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > On 12/4/09, Harry B. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Harry B. >> >> >> DOS 7/5/08 >> >> >> Capt.US Army, Ret. >> >> >> New York >> >> >> >> These people are way different than anything you've ever >> >> >> experienced. >> >> >> >> This statement is right on the money! >> >> >> >> The Afghan people deserve a real chance at Peace, >> >> >> that is why I support President Obama and the Troop increase. >> >> >> >> Study their history, in my opinion the only thing the Afghan people >> >> >> deserve >> >> >> is each other. >> >> >> >> To TRULY stabilize the region so that the population >> >> >> has a real opportunity to establish their own government >> >> >> >> you're dreaming! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> >> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> >> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> >> > -- >> >> > Mark M. Kahle, , >> >> >www.filacoffee.com >> >> >> -- >> >> Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com >> >> > -- >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> -- >> Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Mark M. Kahle, , www.filacoffee.com -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
