KIT,,
Plain's post 11:05 CT this date: "it all boils down to socialism vs capitalism." KIT's post 11:06 CT this date: "Well said PlainOl" What do you call that? Sorry, not up to you to decide who is and who is not contributing to our society. On Mar 4, 6:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly, > > Again, I never claimed that executive branch agencies were, "Socialist"; > you are confusing my posts with someone elses. > > I have no problem with what Missouri is doing, as a matter of fact, what > Missouri is doing is none of my business. It might be a wonderful > organization. > > I want the Federal DOT dissolved, banished, and all of its current employees > given a pink slip, wherein they can join the ranks of productive Americans, > by manufacturing, selling, servicing, generating, producing, marketing, or > somehow contributing to our society. > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > KIT, > > > Will you be serious? Did you Goggle the DOT and see what their duties > > are or not? > > Mainly they use the trucks to haul around equipment and materials for > > road repair. That's what the MODOT does, repair and maintain roads > > within the state.What did you think they used them for? > > > WHAT SUDDENLY MAKES ANY OF THESE AGENCIES SOCIALIST??? > > > On Mar 4, 4:54 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why do we need a federal DOT, when the Misouri DOT is the one soliciting > > the > > > bids, and riding around in the trucks with MODOT?? > > > > What does the Missouri DOT need with a truck? > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > KIT, > > > > > Really? A construction compay owner just looks out his window one day > > > > and says "what the fuck are we going to do with all this fucking > > > > concrete?" "Hey, I know, let's build an 8 lane highway fron St. Louis > > > > to Kansas City". That should be a hoot. > > > > No agency makes a study concerning the need for such a highway, when > > > > it should be built or what route it should take? No one solicits bids > > > > for the construction of same and sets standards, qualifications, > > > > deadlines, nothing? > > > > > Those orange trucks in my state with MODOT (Missouri Dept. Of > > > > transportation) painting on their sides have absolutely > > > > no connection with the U.S. DOT? > > > > > What has happened to your statement that ALL these agencies were > > > > socialist? Why, all the sudden, is the focus of your posts are on the > > > > effeciency of these agencies? I don't believe I was talking about > > > > their particular effeciency. > > > > > WHAT MAKES THOSE AGENCIES, THAT HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR DECADES, SUDDENLY > > > > SOCIALIST???? > > > > Have you forgotten the subject of the film clip you posted to start > > > > this thread? > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:37 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > The DOT has never built a street, a highway, a bridge, much less a > > > > sidewalk > > > > > in this Nation, EVER!!! > > > > > > The Department of Energy has yet to build a power plant, or design a > > > > nuclear > > > > > station.....The purpose of the DOE was to reduce our dependency on > > > > foreign > > > > > oil.....How's that working out for us?? > > > > > > The Department of Education??? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!! > > > > > > These agencies are nothing more than "Job Fare" and a drain on the > > > > American > > > > > tax payer! They do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! (Except continue to grow, > > > > with > > > > > their budgets getting bigger each and every year.....Eventually, each > > one > > > > of > > > > > these agencies wants their own law enforcment division, where they > > can > > > > bully > > > > > the folks who pay their salaries!) > > > > > > Wake up and smell the coffee Holly!! > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > C'mon KIT you are smart enough to Google those agencies and find > > out > > > > > > what their duties are. Why should I do your work for you? If you > > don't > > > > > > know what they do how did you reach the conclusion they do it > > poorly? > > > > > > > You STLL don't want to discuss how all those agencies suddenly > > became > > > > > > socialist????? > > > > > > > Who do you propose build and maintain our highways and streets if > > not > > > > > > the DOT? > > > > > > Who would regulate the trucking industry? > > > > > > > Why are you suddenly omitting the ATF? > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 2:55 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > I never made such a claim, that the Department of Education, the > > > > > > Department > > > > > > > of Transportation, or the DOEnergy are socialist. They are > > > > bureaucratic > > > > > > > quagmires, that do nothing! They are a drain on our economy, > > and > > > > should > > > > > > be > > > > > > > done away with. > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of Education does? > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of Transportation does? > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of Energy does? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > Pay attention KIT. Where did I suggest having a EXCLUSIVELY > > > > SOCIALIST > > > > > > > > CONTROLLED government in the United States? > > > > > > > > > Don't you want to address how the govt. agencies you > > > > mentioned,which > > > > > > > > have been in existance for fucking decades, suddenly became > > > > socialist > > > > > > > > under THIS administration but were not during the PREVIOUS > > > > > > > > administration? > > > > > > > > > NO? Thought not. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 2:19 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > Show me any socialist Nation-State, or communist Nation-State > > > > that is > > > > > > > > > working successfully. Show me one successful socialistic > > program > > > > in > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > Nation that is working well. Just one, pick any one that you > > > > think > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > defend. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Hollywood < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > Soooo, you're saying American are stupid? Many govt. have > > > > active > > > > > > > > > > socialist parties that are active in govt. You are rigid > > and > > > > > > > > > > unimaginative and insist of simply bleating slogans and > > talking > > > > > > > > > > points. Almost EVERY govt. has agencies that perform the > > duties > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > agencies you mention, some with more efficiency than > > others. > > > > Just > > > > > > > > > > because those agencies are NOW within the Obama > > administration > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > not suddenly make them "socialist". The same agencies > > existed > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > the previous administration, doing the functions as they do > > > > now. > > > > > > > > > > You're talking partisan bullshit. > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 12:27 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > > Horse Hockey! > > > > > > > > > > > > It is very, "black and white". There is no socialistic > > > > program > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > worked in this Nation, period. There is no socialistic > > form > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > government, > > > > > > > > > > > that has been successful, anywhere, period. > > > > > > > > > > > > Take it to the bank my friend! Your comments the other > > day, > > > > that > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > believed we needed government bureauacracies such as the > > DOT, > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > DOEnergy, > > > > > > > > > > > The DOEducation, and the ATF, shows why socialists and > > those > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > left > > > > > > > > > > > cannot be left to their own, "innovations". They all > > want, > > > > > > > > "Something > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing"; and for you and I to pay for it..... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Hollywood < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonesense, your thinking is too black/white. Why do > > things > > > > have > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > ONLY free-market capitalism OR rigid socialism? Take > > the > > > > best > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > two (or more) political/sociall/economic models and use > > > > them to > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage. America is the great adapter, the > > innovator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 11:01 am, Keith In Tampa < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Worth a watch: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=G44NCvNDLfc > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google > > Groups. > > > > > > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > > > > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp:// > > > >www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>< > >http://www.politicalforum.com/>< > > > >http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our > > > > polls. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google > > Groups. > > > > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp:// > >www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>< > >http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > > > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our > > polls. > > > > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
