KIT, You're still a kid, I'll be 61 this coming July 2nd. Happy birthday to you.
My point exactly. You know as well as I do that in another 48 hours no one will remember the thread ever wxisted or you ever made the statement to Studio....except for me of course. Whether or not it's misguided is YET to be proven., THAT'S the point. On Mar 7, 10:10 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Good Morning Holly! > > It was my birthday yesterday.....I hit the big, "Five Dash Three". I was > screwing off on Friday, and yesterday.....Although I have been revisiting > with a little more frequency, the posts here in PF, I still have a life > Holly!! > > My point being, is that I know that you have been on the edge of your seat, > atwitter with excitement and anticipation, awaiting my response. I am > currently at my fiance's home, but I will be going over to the office > shortly, and will take the time to sit down and respond to Stu-Stu-Studio's > misguided rhetoric here shortly! > > Stay tuned!! > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > KIT, > > > A point i'd wish to make. In the posts of yours I'm responding to you > > state that Studio's post will take time & effort to research in order > > for you to post a reasoned response. > > You know and I know that very few threads live much more than 72 hours > > here. About 48 hours have passed and you've posted nothing on this > > thread. No one has posted anything on this thread (until now) since > > early friday evening. For all intents and purposes this thread is > > pretty much dead and forgotten. > > I propose you never intended to even attempt to logically refute > > Studio's post because you knew you could not and the "will take time > > to research" was simply a ruse to buy time. > > > On Mar 5, 10:53 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Holly, > > > > I didn't mean to offend you, I apologize. > > > > I enjoy this board and its members, and occasionally, I toss out a few > > > barbs. I didn't think that my barbs were all that hurtful or mean > > > spirited. I had forgotten about your recovery, and please know that I > > > meant no offense. > > > > Studio's post will take some time and research in order to post a well > > > thought out response. Again, no offense, but you are just arguing, for > > > argument's sake! (I sometimes enjoy that too!!) > > > > Have a great weekend, and again, lighten up!! > > > > Keith > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > KIT, > > > > > You first Keith. You started with the "you are a little slow" and then > > > > the "crack" comment. > > > > You know i respond in kind. You play nice and I will, you want to be > > > > ugly I'll go there to. Your choice. > > > > > You're "too rushed" to respond to Studio's comments concerning Chile > > > > (two hours ago) but have time to tell me to "lighten up" because I > > > > talked to you in the manner you talked to me? WTF? > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:26 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > Lighten up! > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > Fine, you want to pretend your stupid be my guest. You added the > > DOT > > > > > > and other agencies to the subject. You said they were not needed > > and > > > > > > complained about ineffeciency and, judging from your ranting about > > > > > > anything having to do with socialism, the implication was because > > > > > > those agencies were socialist and anything socialist was doomed to > > be > > > > > > a failure. > > > > > > Now, if those agencies were gone tomorrow who or what would perform > > > > > > their duties/functions and why would their doing it NOT be > > socialism? > > > > > > > You know god-damn good and well that I'm a recovering > > alcoholic/addict > > > > > > with 24 plus years clean. I have not yet stooped to person insults > > to > > > > > > you. > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 8:20 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > I realize that you are a little slow, as most liberals are. > > > > PlainOl' > > > > > > was > > > > > > > talking about the video, and I was referencing his comments about > > the > > > > > > > video. PlainOl didn't make any comment about the Missouri DOT > > being > > > > > > > socialist!! > > > > > > > > No more crack rock for you Holly!!! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > KIT,, > > > > > > > > > Plain's post 11:05 CT this date: > > > > > > > > > "it all boils down to socialism vs capitalism." > > > > > > > > > KIT's post 11:06 CT this date: > > > > > > > > > "Well said PlainOl" > > > > > > > > > What do you call that? > > > > > > > > > Sorry, not up to you to decide who is and who is not > > contributing > > > > to > > > > > > > > our society. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > Again, I never claimed that executive branch agencies were, > > > > > > "Socialist"; > > > > > > > > > you are confusing my posts with someone elses. > > > > > > > > > > I have no problem with what Missouri is doing, as a matter of > > > > fact, > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > Missouri is doing is none of my business. It might be a > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > organization. > > > > > > > > > > I want the Federal DOT dissolved, banished, and all of its > > > > current > > > > > > > > employees > > > > > > > > > given a pink slip, wherein they can join the ranks of > > productive > > > > > > > > Americans, > > > > > > > > > by manufacturing, selling, servicing, generating, producing, > > > > > > marketing, > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > somehow contributing to our society. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Hollywood < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > Will you be serious? Did you Goggle the DOT and see what > > their > > > > > > duties > > > > > > > > > > are or not? > > > > > > > > > > Mainly they use the trucks to haul around equipment and > > > > materials > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > road repair. That's what the MODOT does, repair and > > maintain > > > > roads > > > > > > > > > > within the state.What did you think they used them for? > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT SUDDENLY MAKES ANY OF THESE AGENCIES SOCIALIST??? > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 4:54 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Why do we need a federal DOT, when the Misouri DOT is the > > one > > > > > > > > soliciting > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > bids, and riding around in the trucks with MODOT?? > > > > > > > > > > > > What does the Missouri DOT need with a truck? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Hollywood < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? A construction compay owner just looks out his > > > > window > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > day > > > > > > > > > > > > and says "what the fuck are we going to do with all > > this > > > > > > fucking > > > > > > > > > > > > concrete?" "Hey, I know, let's build an 8 lane highway > > fron > > > > St. > > > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > to Kansas City". That should be a hoot. > > > > > > > > > > > > No agency makes a study concerning the need for such a > > > > highway, > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > it should be built or what route it should take? No one > > > > > > solicits > > > > > > > > bids > > > > > > > > > > > > for the construction of same and sets standards, > > > > > > qualifications, > > > > > > > > > > > > deadlines, nothing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those orange trucks in my state with MODOT (Missouri > > Dept. > > > > Of > > > > > > > > > > > > transportation) painting on their sides have absolutely > > > > > > > > > > > > no connection with the U.S. DOT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > What has happened to your statement that ALL these > > agencies > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > > > socialist? Why, all the sudden, is the focus of your > > posts > > > > are > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > effeciency of these agencies? I don't believe I was > > talking > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > their particular effeciency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT MAKES THOSE AGENCIES, THAT HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR > > > > DECADES, > > > > > > > > SUDDENLY > > > > > > > > > > > > SOCIALIST???? > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you forgotten the subject of the film clip you > > posted > > > > to > > > > > > start > > > > > > > > > > > > this thread? > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:37 pm, Keith In Tampa < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The DOT has never built a street, a highway, a > > bridge, > > > > much > > > > > > less > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > sidewalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this Nation, EVER!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Department of Energy has yet to build a power > > plant, > > > > or > > > > > > > > design a > > > > > > > > > > > > nuclear > > > > > > > > > > > > > station.....The purpose of the DOE was to reduce our > > > > > > dependency > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > foreign > > > > > > > > > > > > > oil.....How's that working out for us?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Department of Education??? > > HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These agencies are nothing more than "Job Fare" and a > > > > drain > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > > > > > > tax payer! They do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! (Except > > > > continue > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > grow, > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > their budgets getting bigger each and every > > > > > > year.....Eventually, > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > these agencies wants their own law enforcment > > division, > > > > where > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > bully > > > > > > > > > > > > > the folks who pay their salaries!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wake up and smell the coffee Holly!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Hollywood < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon KIT you are smart enough to Google those > > agencies > > > > and > > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > > > > out > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
