Holly, Lighten up! On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> KIT, > > Fine, you want to pretend your stupid be my guest. You added the DOT > and other agencies to the subject. You said they were not needed and > complained about ineffeciency and, judging from your ranting about > anything having to do with socialism, the implication was because > those agencies were socialist and anything socialist was doomed to be > a failure. > Now, if those agencies were gone tomorrow who or what would perform > their duties/functions and why would their doing it NOT be socialism? > > You know god-damn good and well that I'm a recovering alcoholic/addict > with 24 plus years clean. I have not yet stooped to person insults to > you. > > > > > > On Mar 5, 8:20 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Holly, > > > > I realize that you are a little slow, as most liberals are. PlainOl' > was > > talking about the video, and I was referencing his comments about the > > video. PlainOl didn't make any comment about the Missouri DOT being > > socialist!! > > > > No more crack rock for you Holly!!! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > KIT,, > > > > > Plain's post 11:05 CT this date: > > > > > "it all boils down to socialism vs capitalism." > > > > > KIT's post 11:06 CT this date: > > > > > "Well said PlainOl" > > > > > What do you call that? > > > > > Sorry, not up to you to decide who is and who is not contributing to > > > our society. > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Holly, > > > > > > Again, I never claimed that executive branch agencies were, > "Socialist"; > > > > you are confusing my posts with someone elses. > > > > > > I have no problem with what Missouri is doing, as a matter of fact, > what > > > > Missouri is doing is none of my business. It might be a wonderful > > > > organization. > > > > > > I want the Federal DOT dissolved, banished, and all of its current > > > employees > > > > given a pink slip, wherein they can join the ranks of productive > > > Americans, > > > > by manufacturing, selling, servicing, generating, producing, > marketing, > > > or > > > > somehow contributing to our society. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > Will you be serious? Did you Goggle the DOT and see what their > duties > > > > > are or not? > > > > > Mainly they use the trucks to haul around equipment and materials > for > > > > > road repair. That's what the MODOT does, repair and maintain roads > > > > > within the state.What did you think they used them for? > > > > > > > WHAT SUDDENLY MAKES ANY OF THESE AGENCIES SOCIALIST??? > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 4:54 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Why do we need a federal DOT, when the Misouri DOT is the one > > > soliciting > > > > > the > > > > > > bids, and riding around in the trucks with MODOT?? > > > > > > > > What does the Missouri DOT need with a truck? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > Really? A construction compay owner just looks out his window > one > > > day > > > > > > > and says "what the fuck are we going to do with all this > fucking > > > > > > > concrete?" "Hey, I know, let's build an 8 lane highway fron St. > > > Louis > > > > > > > to Kansas City". That should be a hoot. > > > > > > > No agency makes a study concerning the need for such a highway, > > > when > > > > > > > it should be built or what route it should take? No one > solicits > > > bids > > > > > > > for the construction of same and sets standards, > qualifications, > > > > > > > deadlines, nothing? > > > > > > > > > Those orange trucks in my state with MODOT (Missouri Dept. Of > > > > > > > transportation) painting on their sides have absolutely > > > > > > > no connection with the U.S. DOT? > > > > > > > > > What has happened to your statement that ALL these agencies > were > > > > > > > socialist? Why, all the sudden, is the focus of your posts are > on > > > the > > > > > > > effeciency of these agencies? I don't believe I was talking > about > > > > > > > their particular effeciency. > > > > > > > > > WHAT MAKES THOSE AGENCIES, THAT HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR DECADES, > > > SUDDENLY > > > > > > > SOCIALIST???? > > > > > > > Have you forgotten the subject of the film clip you posted to > start > > > > > > > this thread? > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:37 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > The DOT has never built a street, a highway, a bridge, much > less > > > a > > > > > > > sidewalk > > > > > > > > in this Nation, EVER!!! > > > > > > > > > > The Department of Energy has yet to build a power plant, or > > > design a > > > > > > > nuclear > > > > > > > > station.....The purpose of the DOE was to reduce our > dependency > > > on > > > > > > > foreign > > > > > > > > oil.....How's that working out for us?? > > > > > > > > > > The Department of Education??? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!! > > > > > > > > > > These agencies are nothing more than "Job Fare" and a drain > on > > > the > > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > tax payer! They do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! (Except continue > to > > > grow, > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > their budgets getting bigger each and every > year.....Eventually, > > > each > > > > > one > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > these agencies wants their own law enforcment division, where > > > they > > > > > can > > > > > > > bully > > > > > > > > the folks who pay their salaries!) > > > > > > > > > > Wake up and smell the coffee Holly!! > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Hollywood < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > C'mon KIT you are smart enough to Google those agencies and > > > find > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > what their duties are. Why should I do your work for you? > If > > > you > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > know what they do how did you reach the conclusion they do > it > > > > > poorly? > > > > > > > > > > > You STLL don't want to discuss how all those agencies > suddenly > > > > > became > > > > > > > > > socialist????? > > > > > > > > > > > Who do you propose build and maintain our highways and > streets > > > if > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > the DOT? > > > > > > > > > Who would regulate the trucking industry? > > > > > > > > > > > Why are you suddenly omitting the ATF? > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 2:55 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > > I never made such a claim, that the Department of > Education, > > > the > > > > > > > > > Department > > > > > > > > > > of Transportation, or the DOEnergy are socialist. They > are > > > > > > > bureaucratic > > > > > > > > > > quagmires, that do nothing! They are a drain on our > > > economy, > > > > > and > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > done away with. > > > > > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of Education > does? > > > > > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of > Transportation > > > does? > > > > > > > > > > > > What is it that you think the Department of Energy does? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Hollywood < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pay attention KIT. Where did I suggest having a > EXCLUSIVELY > > > > > > > SOCIALIST > > > > > > > > > > > CONTROLLED government in the United States? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you want to address how the govt. agencies you > > > > > > > mentioned,which > > > > > > > > > > > have been in existance for fucking decades, suddenly > became > > > > > > > socialist > > > > > > > > > > > under THIS administration but were not during the > PREVIOUS > > > > > > > > > > > administration? > > > > > > > > > > > > > NO? Thought not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 2:19 pm, Keith In Tampa < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Show me any socialist Nation-State, or communist > > > Nation-State > > > > > > > that is > > > > > > > > > > > > working successfully. Show me one successful > socialistic > > > > > program > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > Nation that is working well. Just one, pick any one > that > > > you > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > defend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Hollywood < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Soooo, you're saying American are stupid? Many > govt. > > > have > > > > > > > active > > > > > > > > > > > > > socialist parties that are active in govt. You are > > > rigid > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > unimaginative and insist of simply bleating slogans > and > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > > > > > > points. Almost EVERY govt. has agencies that > perform > > > the > > > > > duties > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > agencies you mention, some with more efficiency > than > > > > > others. > > > > > > > Just > > > > > > > > > > > > > because those agencies are NOW within the Obama > > > > > administration > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > > > > not suddenly make them "socialist". The same > agencies > > > > > existed > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > > > > the previous administration, doing the functions as > > > they do > > > > > > > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're talking partisan bullshit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 12:27 pm, Keith In Tampa < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Horse Hockey! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is very, "black and white". There is no > > > socialistic > > > > > > > program > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > worked in this Nation, period. There is no > > > socialistic > > > > > form > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > government, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that has been successful, anywhere, period. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take it to the bank my friend! Your comments the > > > other > > > > > day, > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > believed we needed government bureauacracies such > as > > > the > > > > > DOT, > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOEnergy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The DOEducation, and the ATF, shows why > socialists > > > and > > > > > those > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > left > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot be left to their own, "innovations". > They > > > all > > > > > want, > > > > > > > > > > > "Something > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing"; and for you and I to pay for it..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Hollywood < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonesense, your thinking is too black/white. > Why do > > > > > things > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ONLY free-market capitalism OR rigid socialism? > > > Take > > > > > the > > > > > > > best > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two (or more) political/sociall/economic models > and > > > use > > > > > > > them to > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advantage. America is the great adapter, the > > > > > innovator. > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
