*I am out of time and I will waste no more of it on this today. *
*Democrats are not Marxists, Communists, or Socialists.*
**
*You are mistaken. *
**
* *
On 9/21/10, *Keith In Tampa* <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hey Tom, since you seem to have a little time on your hands this
afternoon:
Here is a post by Travis from yesterday, which is captioned,
"Communist Goals - 1963 Congressional Record. In the
Congressional Record, an excerpt from, "The Naked Communist," by
Cleon Skousen is read and quoted.
Why don't you take the time to see how your Senators compare to
this track record? How many of the current Democrats have
supported the tenets and platform from this excerpt in 1963? I
bet it would shock you to learn the truth.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bbc1dd23fc80d8c1#
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*Wrong again.*
*Democrats are not Marxists.*
**
*Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.*
On 9/21/10, *Keith In Tampa* <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
*Democrats are not Marxists. *
**
*That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand
Oppressive Party Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". *
**
*======================*
**
Which you do, at every opportunity that you get. There
is a distinction however, Those who I identify as
"Marxists" have a track record of their votes and policies.
Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote
in a Marxist fashion, what else would one call them?
**
**
On 9/21/10, *Keith In Tampa* <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No Tom, you're missing the real issue here,
blinded by some secondary issue.
First, the Pentagon should have every right to
review and determine how repeal of DADT
will effect the military. Second, and more
importantly, the goal by the Marxists is to lock
the Republicans out of amending the proposed
Defense Appropriations bill now before the
Congress. I don't trust the likes of Chuck
Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other
Marxists controlling the vote over Defense
Appropriations. You shouldn't either.
From CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html
But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator
Susan Collins (Confused, Maine) said she would
side with the rest of the GOP because the
Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to
shut Republicans out of the debate."
Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, that the
law is "simply not fair." But she said Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give
Republicans and Democrats "an equal opportunity"
to offer amendments to the defense bill.
"Now is not the time to play politics, and I again
call on the majority leader to work with
Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement so
that the Senate can debate the defense bill this
week," Collins said.
In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she
would support a Republican filibuster, saying the
chamber should be allowed a full debate on the
measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate
would vote on repeal before the military has
completed its review.
"We should all have the opportunity to review that
report which is to be completed on December 1, as
we reevaluate this policy and the implementation
of any new changes," Snowe's statement said.
The defense authorization act, which is a broad
defense policy bill, would not rescind "don't ask,
don't tell" until after the Pentagon completes a
review of the repeal's impact on the military. The
review is due in December and would serve as the
basis for necessary certification by the
president, defense secretary and chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff that the military could
handle repealing the policy.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at
Google Groups.
For options & help see
http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at
http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in
our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google
Groups.
For options & help see
http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at
http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our
polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see
http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at
http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see
http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
<%20http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html>
