As I recall, Keith did not say ALL Dems are Marxists.... just those that vote that way or have said they were indeed Marxists.
Please get the facts straight. On Sep 21, 10:34 am, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > *I am out of time and I will waste no more of it on this today. * > *Democrats are not Marxists, Communists, or Socialists.* > ** > *You are mistaken. * > > ** > > * > > * > > On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Tom, since you seem to have a little time on your hands this > > afternoon: > > > Here is a post by Travis from yesterday, which is captioned, "Communist > > Goals - 1963 Congressional Record. In the Congressional Record, an > > excerpt from, "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen is read and quoted. > > > Why don't you take the time to see how your Senators compare to this track > > record? How many of the current Democrats have supported the tenets and > > platform from this excerpt in 1963? I bet it would shock you to learn the > > truth. > > >http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bb... > > # > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> *Wrong again.* > >> *Democrats are not Marxists.* > >> ** > >> *Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.* > > >> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> *Democrats are not Marxists. * > >>> ** > >>> *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive Party > >>> Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". * > >>> ** > >>> *======================* > >>> ** > >>> Which you do, at every opportunity that you get. There is a distinction > >>> however, Those who I identify as "Marxists" have a track record of > >>> their > >>> votes and policies. > > >>> Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a Marxist > >>> fashion, what else would one call them? > >>> ** > >>> ** > > >>>> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some > >>>>> secondary issue. > > >>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and determine how > >>>>> repeal of DADT will effect the military. Second, and more importantly, > >>>>> the > >>>>> goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out of amending the > >>>>> proposed > >>>>> Defense Appropriations bill now before the Congress. I don't trust the > >>>>> likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other Marxists > >>>>> controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations. You shouldn't either. > > >>>>> From CNN: > > >>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html > > >>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins > >>>>> (Confused, Maine) said she would side with the rest of the GOP because > >>>>> the > >>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of > >>>>> the > >>>>> debate." > > >>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, > >>>>> Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said Senate > >>>>> Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and > >>>>> Democrats > >>>>> "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill. > > >>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the majority > >>>>> leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement so > >>>>> that the > >>>>> Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said. > > >>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a > >>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full > >>>>> debate on > >>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal > >>>>> before the military has completed its review. > > >>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to > >>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the > >>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said. > > >>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill, > >>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon > >>>>> completes > >>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in > >>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the > >>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff > >>>>> that > >>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy. > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>>> * Visit our other community > >>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>>> -- > >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > >>>> Have a great day, > >>>> Tommy > > >>>> -- > >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> * Visit our other community > >>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>> -- > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> * Visit our other community > >>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >> -- > >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > >> Have a great day, > >> Tommy > > >> -- > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >> * Visit our other community > >> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. > Have a great day, > Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
