Hey Jonathan!!

Thanks for sharing this!!!

Uhm......Tom??  Any response????




On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  In October 2009, the Democratic Socialists of America released in its
> newsletter a list of 70 members of the U.S. Congress who are members of the
> organization:
>
> *Co-Chairs*
>
> Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
> Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
>
> *Vice Chairs*
>
> Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
> Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
> Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
> Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
>
> *Senate Members*
>
> Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)
>
> *House Members*
>
> Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
> Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
> Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
> Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
> Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
> Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
> Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
> Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
> Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
> Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
> Hon. William "Lacy" Clay (MO-01)
> Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
> Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
> Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
> Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
> Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
> Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
> Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
> Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
> Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
> Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
> Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
> Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
> Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
> Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
> Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
> Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
> Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
> Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
> Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
> Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
> Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
> Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
> Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
> Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
> Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
> Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
> Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
> Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
> Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
> Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
> Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
> Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
> Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
> Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
> Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
> Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
> Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
> Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
> Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
> Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
> Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
> Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
> Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
> Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
> Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
> Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
> Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
> Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
> Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
> Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
> Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
> Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
> Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
> Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
> Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
> Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
> Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
> Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)
>
>
> On 9/21/2010 9:34 AM, Tommy News wrote:
>
>   *I am out of time and I will waste no more of it on this today. *
> *Democrats are not Marxists, Communists, or Socialists.*
> **
> *You are mistaken. *
>
> **
>
> * *
>
>
>
> On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tom,  since you seem to have a little time on your hands this
>> afternoon:
>>
>> Here is a post by Travis from yesterday, which is captioned, "Communist
>> Goals - 1963 Congressional Record.   In the Congressional Record,  an
>> excerpt from, "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen is read and quoted.
>>
>> Why don't you take the time to see how your Senators compare to this track
>> record?   How many of the current Democrats have supported the tenets and
>> platform from this excerpt in 1963?   I bet it would shock you to learn the
>> truth.
>>
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bbc1dd23fc80d8c1
>> #
>>
>>  On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> *Wrong again.*
>>> *Democrats are not Marxists.*
>>> **
>>> *Calling them such is not the truth, it is false slander.*
>>>
>>>
>>>  On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>> *Democrats are not Marxists. *
>>>> **
>>>> *That is as offensive as calling Republicans "Grand Oppressive Party
>>>> Rethugicans" and Tea Partiers "Teabaggers". *
>>>> **
>>>> *======================*
>>>> **
>>>> Which you do, at every opportunity that you get.   There is a
>>>> distinction however,   Those who I identify as "Marxists"  have a track
>>>> record of their votes and policies.
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes the truth hurts Tom, but when politicians vote in a Marxist
>>>> fashion, what else would one call them?
>>>>  **
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some
>>>>>> secondary issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and determine
>>>>>> how repeal of DADT will effect the military.  Second, and more
>>>>>> importantly, the goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out
>>>>>> of amending the proposed Defense  Appropriations bill now before the
>>>>>> Congress.  I don't trust the likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a
>>>>>> host of other Marxists controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations.
>>>>>> You shouldn't either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  From CNN:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins
>>>>>> (Confused, Maine)  said she would side with the rest of the GOP because 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans out of 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> debate."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
>>>>>> Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said
>>>>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and
>>>>>> Democrats "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the
>>>>>> majority leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an 
>>>>>> agreement so
>>>>>> that the Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a
>>>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full 
>>>>>> debate on
>>>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on repeal
>>>>>> before the military has completed its review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is to
>>>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the
>>>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy bill,
>>>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon 
>>>>>> completes
>>>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due in
>>>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification by the
>>>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at 
>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>>>> Have a great day,
>>>>> Tommy --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at 
>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>
>>>> * Visit our other community at 
>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> Have a great day,
>>> Tommy --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at 
>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at 
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
> Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
> http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html
>
>
> --
> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
> Government*
>
> *"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really
> happening. What
> separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public
> relations."
> - Marc Stevens
>
> "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that
> cannot be."
> - Thomas Jefferson*
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to