http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYvU0dBENOw




On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>wrote:

> Whoops!  I forgot to attach the attachment!
>
> Apologies!
>
> Keith
>
>   On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Keith In Tampa 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  Hey Michael,
>>
>> Maybe that great Irish American, Jude Wannanski might want to take up his
>> research, and resources with John Negroponte, and the United States
>> Congress.  (*See* Attachment, in .pdf format, from June 21, 2006).
>>
>> Below is info from the Congressional Research Office, of the weaponry that
>> was unaccounted for, and at the time that we invaded Iraq, none of these
>> biological weapons had been located.  Again, *See* Attachment....We did
>> find some of them.
>>
>> Below that, is other articles that conclusively prove that not only did we
>> discover that there had been biological weaponry and potential nuclear
>> weaponry in Iraq, but we still, to date, have not accounted for all of
>> Saddam Hussein's and the Baath Party's  weaponry.
>>
>> Anything else, is nothing but far left, liberal mainstream spin and bias,
>> which folks like Tom fall for and quote, hook, line and sinker.
>>
>> Tommy, there is some "special" information for you, as well as a You Tube
>> video clip for you to watch at the bottom of this message:
>>
>> ===========
>>
>> From the Congressional Research Service:  April, 1998:
>>
>> http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/98042705_npo.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Iraq has also acknowledged that prior to the 
>> Persian<http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/98042705_npo.html#>Gulf conflict 
>> it
>> manufactured 100 botulinum bombs, 50 anthrax bombs, and 7 aflatoxin bombs.
>> In addition, 16 missile warheads were filled with botulinum, five with
>> anthrax bacillus, and four with aflatoxin.
>>
>>
>> U.S. and British intelligence agencies believe that Iraq has hidden
>> stores of CBW agents, production equipment, ballistic missiles, and
>> missile warheads. UNSCOM has reported no firm evidence that Iraq still
>> retains weapons or materiel, but the Iraqi government has not provided
>> adequate evidence to support its claim that all its CBW arsenal has been
>> destroyed, nor has it accounted for CBW production materials known to have
>> been in its possession. These factors, coupled with Iraqi obstruction of
>> UNSCOM inspections, have led to strong suspicions. U.S. and British
>> intelligence agencies believe that Iraq still may possess tons of chemical
>> warfare agents and the necessary materials to produce thousands of liters of
>> biological agents. UNSCOM and U.S. intelligence differ in their estimates of
>> the number of actual missiles that may still be in Iraq. Again information
>> is  sketchy. In part, this is because much is classified, but even the
>> classified information is reportedly incomplete. A recent report issued by
>> the British government, however, provided some information (Foreign and
>> Commonwealth Office --
>> (http://193.114.50.5/texts/1998/feb/04/iraqppr.txt).
>>
>>
>> -- British intelligence believes that up to ten SCUD missiles capable
>> of carrying CBW warheads remain hidden.
>>
>> -- UNSCOM reports that between 40-70 CBW-capable missile warheads are
>> unaccounted for.
>>
>>
>> -- Iraq possessed enough growth medium to produce over 16,000 liters more
>> anthrax spores than has been acknowledged.
>>
>>
>> -- 4,000 tons of CW precursor chemicals are unaccounted for; enough to
>> produce several hundred tons of CW agents.
>>
>>
>> -- 31,000 CW munitions remain unaccounted for.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Essential CW production equipment remains unaccounted for.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- It is believed that Iraq may retain undetermined amounts of Ebola
>> virus, bubonic and pneumonic plague bacteria, and the toxin ricin.
>>
>>
>> ========================
>>
>> Thursday, 19 December, 2002, 16:35 GMT
>> *Iraq's 'unaccounted for' weapons*
>>
>>   By Paul Reynolds
>> BBC News Online world affairs correspondent
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2590265.stm
>>
>>
>> Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix has said Iraq's new declaration
>> contains little information that had not been declared by Baghdad before
>> 1998 when UN arms experts were last in Iraq.
>>
>> The US and UK have long had concerns about what is described as
>> unaccounted for chemical, biological and nuclear material. Their assessments
>> were partly based on a report by the weapons inspections organisation
>> Unscom, predecessor to Unmovic.
>>
>> In early 1999, Unscom gave the Security Council its own assessment of what
>> Iraq had destroyed and what remained unaccounted for.
>>
>> The US and UK want a full explanation of what happened to the following:
>>
>>
>>    - 360 tonnes of chemical warfare agents, including 1.5 tonnes of VX
>>    nerve agent;
>>
>>    - 3,000 tonnes of chemical precursors (which are developed into
>>    chemical weapons) including 300 tonnes uniquely used for VX.
>>
>> The 1999 Unscom report said:
>>
>> "According to Iraq, 1.5 tonnes of VX were discarded unilaterally by
>> dumping on the ground. Traces of one VX-degradation product and a chemical
>> known as a VX-stabilizer were found in the samples taken from the VX dump
>> sites. A quantified assessment is not possible."
>>
>>
>> *Biological*
>>
>> Britain and America want to know about:
>>
>> Growth media for 20,000 litres of biological warfare agents. Any Iraqi
>> claims that this will have degenerated will not be accepted as mustard gas
>> found in shells in 1997 was active;
>>
>> Shells for use in biological warfare - 20,000 are missing say the British,
>> 15,000 say the Americans;
>>
>>
>> Unscom said in 1999:
>>
>> "The commission has little or no confidence in Iraq's accounting for
>> proscribed items for which physical evidence is lacking or inconclusive,
>> documentation is sparse or nonexistent, and coherence and consistency is
>> lacking.
>>
>> These include, for example: quantities and types of munitions available
>> for biological weapons (BW) filling; quantities and types of munitions
>> filled with BW agents; quantities and type of bulk agents produced;
>> quantities of bulk agents used in filling; quantities of bulk agents
>> destroyed; quantities of growth media acquired for the programme; and
>> quantities of growth media used/consumed.
>>
>> In addition, the commission has no confidence that all bulk agents have
>> been destroyed; that no BW munitions or weapons remain in Iraq; and that a
>> BW capability does not still exist in Iraq."
>>
>> *Chemical warfare munitions*
>>
>> Washington and London demand disclosure on:
>>
>> 6,000 chemical warfare bombs.
>>
>>
>> Unscom said:
>>
>> The commission has accepted the destruction of about 34,000 munitions on
>> the basis of multiple sources, including physical evidence, documents
>> provided by Iraq etc. However, it has not been possible to achieve a
>> numerical accounting of destroyed munitions due to heavy bomb damage of the
>> CW storage 
>> facilities<https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#>,
>> where these munitions had been stored during the Gulf war. The destruction
>> of about 2,000 unfilled munitions remain uncertain, 550 filled munitions
>> remain unaccounted for.
>>
>> Other key concerns for the US and UK include the following:
>>
>>
>>    - Why did Iraq try to import 60,000 aluminium tubes? Rapidly spinning
>>    rotor tubes in centrifuges are used to separate weapons grade uranium,
>>    though both the British and American reports acknowledge that the tubes
>>    could be used for conventional weapons as well.
>>
>>
>> Why did it try to import other equipment, including vacuum 
>> pumps<https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#>,
>> a winding machine and special chemicals needed in gas 
>> centrifuge<https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#>cascades?
>>
>>
>>
>> =============================================
>>
>> I don't think there is any argument, by anyone who keeps abreast of
>> current affairs and world events, that all of the Western World believed at
>> the time of the United States'  invasion of Iraq, that Saddam Hussein
>> possessed biological and chemical weapons, and was attempting to obtain
>> nuclear weaponry.  Hell, we, (MNO's from Germany, the United States and
>> Great Britain) sold them to Hussein and his government!  Anthrax, VX nerve
>> agent, and a variety of other weapons of mass destruction were never
>> accounted for by Saddam Hussein and his Baath Party led Iraqi government, as
>> late as 2003.
>>
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/jan-june03/wmd_5-29.html
>>
>> As stated, I attached a declassified file from the United States Senate
>> where 500 canisters for missile armament tips  of nerve agent were found in
>> 2006.
>>
>> No major media outcry over that.  Hardly a peep from mainstream media when
>> 550 metric tons of yellow cake was  recently shipped to Canada from Iraq,
>> just this year:
>>
>> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2008/07/07/msm-yawn-550-met...
>>
>>
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-elliott/weapons-of-mass-destructi_b_23650.html
>>
>> http://stke.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/2003/203/pe42
>>
>> Former President Clinton believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass
>> destruction:
>>
>> http://www.spacewar.com/2004/040109015020.8ivyabdw.html
>>
>> Tom, you stated that President Bush lied, and that no one in their right
>> mind could have believed Saddam, however this video is pretty convincing to
>> me, that Iraq could have in fact possessed weapons of mass destruction:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FiD7xsSw6s
>>
>> But lets move on.
>>
>>
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to