Well Tom, you just echoed the court on why DOMA is unconstitutional.
It IS.

On Jan 7, 8:22 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
> Markie Mark-
>
> Your statements are naive and you are clearly uneducated.
>
> At the time the Constitution was written in the late 18th Century, "gay"
> simply meant festive, happy, or beautiful, and the term had nothing to do
> with sexuality whatsoever. Since the term did not refer to same-gendered
> "friendship", which was the term used for same gender relationships at that
> time, the term "gay" does not exist in the Constitution at all, as the term
> as we now use it did not exist. In fact, in the 1780's, Sex was rarely ever
> discussed or mentioned at all outside of close private encounters between
> "friends" and couples behind closed doors. The Constitution does, however,
> state in the 14th amendment that discrimination against any citizen is
> unlawful: " All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
> subject to the jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> thereof, are citizens of
> the United States and of the State wherein they reside.( No ) State shall
> make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
> citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
> deprive<glossary.html#DEPRIVE>any person of life, liberty, or
> property, without due
> process <consttop_duep.html> of law; nor deny to any person within its
> jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> the equal protection of the laws."
> Therefore, the current unequal second calss citizen status of gays in the
> United States is unlawful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory.
>
> So there you have it, Markie. I hope that this lesson in etymology and the
> Constitution enlightens you somewhat.
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tommy,
>
> > Please list all rights as enumerated in the Constitution that Gays
> > (etc) do not have.
>
> > You constantly harp about "RIGHTS" .... You never list them. Just what
> > are those "Rights" that you feel are absent in your life that others
> > have.
>
> > Please DO NOT list "Privileges" or "Licenses" that can only be granted
> > on a State level.
>
> > ONLY "Rights" are meant to be universal... The different "privileges"
> > and "licenses"  that are left to the "Several States" are not now nor
> > were they ever meant to be, "Rights".
>
> > Each State is in itself "Sovereign" with local rules being that which
> > makes a State attractive to one and repulsive to another. (I would
> > NEVER live in Texas)
>
> > Traffic laws, Domestic violence laws, noise laws, land use laws,
> > marriage/divorce laws, and even the death penalty laws ALL vary from
> > State to State because the "Several States" have the "Right" to make
> > it so. They must bow to to will of the people in that State as long as
> > it does not interfere with one of the Federally Guaranteed and
> > Constitutionally enumerated "Rights".
>
> > Just which of your Constitutionally Guaranteed and Enumerated "Rights"
> > are you lacking ??
>
> > I'll wait for the list and your personal explanation for each. Then we
> > can discuss it.
>
> > I am anxiously awaiting your well thought-out and accurate (remember,
> > Constitutionally Enumerated "Right") list to begin an earnest
> > discussion.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to