MJ is undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Feb 17, 11:24 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoping for a Patriot Act setting? > Why are you so FEARFUL of allowing others to see it? > HERE is the US Constitution:http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txtThe > various conventions (at the time of its ratification) reviewed, discussed, > etc. > Your FEAR of allowing the Members of this Group READ it is quite telling. > Your incessant and endless fallacious replies tell an even greater story. > Regard$, > --MJ "...whatever power you give the State to do things for you carries with > it the equivalent power to do things to you." -- A. J. NockAt 11:00 AM > 2/17/2011, you wrote:Dear J. A.: You have a bossy tone. My New Constitution > will be voted > on, up-or-down, without discussion. "A 'camel' is a HORSE designed in > a committee!" The following reply to MJ also applies to you: > Folks: This MJ fellow has a friendly salutation, "Regard$". But he > is shallow-minded to suppose that my New Constitution is like a book > to be reviewed. The functionality of my document has withstood the > tests of events in the news that raise one's ire. If there is some > apparent injustice, I check to see if that same injustice would > prevail under my New Constitution. Over thirteen plus years, changes > were required in the wording, until, finally, few if any injustices > being told in the news would prevail. The latter thirteen year > process was my objective "review". No person on Earth could be more > objective than me, in what I've written, and why. — John A. Armistead > — Patriot > > > On Feb 16, 4:36 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > John, > > > > Post your "New Constitution" and engage in meaningful discussion or quit > > complaining. > > > > On 2/16/2011 1:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, MJ. Go jump in a lake! No reader of my posts wants to hear the > > > dribble of a loser like you. Quotations of others just don't impress > > > the reader. So, learn and leave. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > On Feb 15, 9:56 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> It is an endless circle of fallacy spew ... yet > > >> NO posting yet of this 'fabulous' Constitution. > > >> Go figure. > > > > >> Regard$, > > >> --MJ > > > > >> It is amazing how many people think that they can > > >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe > > >> anything about anything, without having to bother > > >> to deal with facts or logic. -- Thomas Sowell > > > > >> At 12:47 AM 2/15/2011, you wrote: > > > > >>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > >>> with > > >>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > >>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > >>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > >>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>> On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > > >>>> Why not simply posit your Constitution > > >>> instead so it can be discussed and we might get somewhere? > > >>>> Regard$, > > >>>> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > > >>>> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > >>>> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > >>>> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > > >>>> about anything, without having to bother to deal > > >>>> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 > > >>> PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with > > >>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > >>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > >>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > >>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > >>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > >>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>>>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > > >>>>> I can certainly understand WHY you would > > >>> prefer NOT to support (or attempt to) your efforts or claims. > > >>>>> Regard$, > > >>>>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > > >>>>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > > >>>>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > > >>>>> the loss of their pleasing vision. > > >>>>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the > > >>> Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM 2/13/2011, you > > >>> wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > >>> with > > >>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > >>>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > >>>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > >>>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > >>>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > >>>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > >>>>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm > > >>>>>> doing. I invite your more specific comments, because time does not > > >>>>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies. Your "$" salutation > > >>>>>> amuses > > >>>>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to > > >>>>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US > > >>>>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something > > >>>>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had. > > >>>>>> Post the text already. > > >>>>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable. > > >>>>>> Regard$, > > >>>>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for > > >>> all the sorrows of the world is no reason for > > >>> my accepting yours. It simply supports the > > >>> strong probability that yours is a fake. -- H.L. Mencken > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>> -- > > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > -- > > Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges > > and lawyers <... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
