Folks: MJ is 'crashing' my party for the purpose of hawking his big- letter quotations and his nothing of a constitution. Should I call... the police? MJ is certainly undeserving of being read, and undeserving of being replied to regarding anything he writes. Crazies like him should be in an institution. Agreed? — J. A. A. —
On Feb 19, 10:27 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > <sigh> > And yet two (2) times a reply is provided. > HOWEVER, we have YET to see this panacea Constitution. > Pity. > Regard$, > --MJThe power of the statists to exercise unrestrained force against people > goes to the essence of all political systems. Being defined even by > political “scientists” as an entity that exercises a monopoly on the use of > violence within a given geographic area, the state must continue to exercise > such unquestioned powers, particularly at times when its credibility and > respect are in rapid decline. The people employed to carry out such powers > be they police officers, TSA employees, militarists, bureaucrats of various > stripes, etc. are the kinds of sociopaths who are eager to exercise such > unrestricted violence against others. The state is the playground bully writ > large, and state officials are unwilling to hold their bullies accountable > for their wrongs because, to do so, would be to deny the very monopoly status > that defines their system. -- Butler ShafferAt 10:00 AM 2/19/2011, you > wrote:MJ is undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > > > On Feb 18, 10:00 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > <sigh> > > And yet three (3) times a reply is provided. > > HOWEVER, we have YET to see this panacea Constitution. > > Pity. > > Regard$, > > --MJThe power of the statists to exercise unrestrained force against people > > goes to the essence of all political systems. Being defined even by > > political “scientists” as an entity that exercises a monopoly on the use > > of violence within a given geographic area, the state must continue to > > exercise such unquestioned powers, particularly at times when its > > credibility and respect are in rapid decline. The people employed to carry > > out such powers be they police officers, TSA employees, militarists, > > bureaucrats of various stripes, etc. are the kinds of sociopaths who are > > eager to exercise such unrestricted violence against others. The state is > > the playground bully writ large, and state officials are unwilling to hold > > their bullies accountable for their wrongs because, to do so, would be to > > deny the very monopoly status that defines their system. -- Butler > > ShafferAt 09:51 AM 2/18/2011, you wrote:MJ is undeserving of a reply. — J. > > A. A. — > > > > > On Feb 17, 11:24 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hoping for a Patriot Act setting? > > > Why are you so FEARFUL of allowing others to see it? > > > HERE is the US > > > Constitution:http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txtThevariousconventions > > > (at the time of its ratification) reviewed, discussed, etc. > > > Your FEAR of allowing the Members of this Group READ it is quite telling. > > > Your incessant and endless fallacious replies tell an even greater story. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJ "...whatever power you give the State to do things for you carries > > > with it the equivalent power to do things to you." -- A. J. NockAt 11:00 > > > AM 2/17/2011, you wrote:Dear J. A.: You have a bossy tone. My New > > > Constitution will be voted > > > on, up-or-down, without discussion. "A 'camel' is a HORSE designed in > > > a committee!" The following reply to MJ also applies to you: > > > Folks: This MJ fellow has a friendly salutation, "Regard$". But he > > > is shallow-minded to suppose that my New Constitution is like a book > > > to be reviewed. The functionality of my document has withstood the > > > tests of events in the news that raise one's ire. If there is some > > > apparent injustice, I check to see if that same injustice would > > > prevail under my New Constitution. Over thirteen plus years, changes > > > were required in the wording, until, finally, few if any injustices > > > being told in the news would prevail. The latter thirteen year > > > process was my objective "review". No person on Earth could be more > > > objective than me, in what I've written, and why. — John A. Armistead > > > — Patriot > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 4:36 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > > > > > Post your "New Constitution" and engage in meaningful discussion or quit > > > > complaining. > > > > > > > > On 2/16/2011 1:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, MJ. Go jump in a lake! No reader of my posts wants to hear the > > > > > dribble of a loser like you. Quotations of others just don't impress > > > > > the reader. So, learn and leave. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > > On Feb 15, 9:56 am, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> It is an endless circle of fallacy spew ... yet > > > > >> NO posting yet of this 'fabulous' Constitution. > > > > >> Go figure. > > > > > > > > >> Regard$, > > > > >> --MJ > > > > > > > > >> It is amazing how many people think that they can > > > > >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > > > >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > > > >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe > > > > >> anything about anything, without having to bother > > > > >> to deal with facts or logic. -- Thomas Sowell > > > > > > > > >> At 12:47 AM 2/15/2011, you wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > > > >>> with > > > > >>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > > > >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > > > >>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, I > > > > >>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual approval > > > > >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > > > >>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > >>> On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy? > > > > >>>> Why not simply posit your Constitution > > > > >>> instead so it can be discussed and we might get somewhere? > > > > >>>> Regard$, > > > > >>>> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can > > > > >>>> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to > > > > >>>> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of > > > > >>>> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything > > > > >>>> about anything, without having to bother to deal > > > > >>>> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 > > > > >>> PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, > > > > >>> MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par > > > > >>>> with > > > > >>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein covered > > > > >>>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things > > > > >>>> when apt. Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure. So, > > > > >>>> I > > > > >>>> must decline to reply to you in the future. You individual > > > > >>>> approval > > > > >>>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the > > > > >>>> ratification process. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > >>>>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown. > > > > >>>>> I can certainly understand WHY you would > > > > >>> prefer NOT to support (or attempt to) your efforts or claims. > > > > >>>>> Regard$, > > > > >>>>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive > > > > >>>>> minds. But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the > > > > >>>>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret > > > > >>>>> the loss of their pleasing vision. > > > > >>>>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the > > > > >>> Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM 2/13/2011, you > > > > >>> wrote:Dear MJ: Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a > > > > >>> par with > > > > >>>>> your library of worthy quotes from others. Albert Einstein > > > > >>>>> covered... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
