J. Ashley: Has anyone posted any comments in support of your caveman anarchy? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. — > On May 16, 5:42 pm, Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: > I find it extremely interesting that the only comments on John's New > Constitution come from those who are able to poke holes in it. I have > yet to see anyone post any comments in support of his diatribe. > > On 05/16/2011 01:41 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Do this MJ: Spend nearly 15 years of your life pinning and polishing > > a New Constitution. On the day of the referendum, the voters will get > > to decide whose has the most appeal to them. Your ideas of the worth > > of my document don't matter. � J. A. A. � > > On May 16, 2:11 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Again you attempt to change the subject. > >> Whether I read or have read Atlas Shrugged is irrelevant ... just like the > >> remainder of your response. > >> Regard$, > >> --MJ "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or > >> religious or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. > >> Government should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure > >> liberty by protecting the equal rights of each from aggression...[when] > >> governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of > >> defeating the very ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 07:44 > >> PM 5/12/2011, you wrote:MJ: You should read 'Atlas Shrugged.' Government > >> could NEVER > >> orchestrate an entire economy, the way "the law of supply and demand" > >> can. Our biggest problem with government is that those out-of-touch, > >> career politicians have zero real-world experience. They actually > >> BELIEVE that they are necessary to determine how everything on Earth > >> gets done. Within four total years of the ratification my New > >> Constitution there won't be a single "career path" politician in > >> Washington! � J. A. A. � > >> On May 12, 1:47 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> At 08:18 PM 5/11/2011, you wrote:Dear Jonathan: No! Only "schemes" that > >>> have the strings being pulled > >>> by government would be socialist. My New Constitution includes these > >>> and other protections to require "fairness" (not... equality) from > >>> businesses: > >>> Government REQUIRING any business, individual, collection of individuals > >>> that serves ANYTHING other than securing EVERYONE's right to life; their > >>> own life; self-ownership serves to provide advantage to some at the > >>> expense of others AND necessarily interferes with the use of one's > >>> private property -- you know, socialism. > >>> You STILL do not see how you are endorsing and promoting what you claim > >>> to be eliminating."Businesses and professions shall be fair to their > >>> employees and to > >>> their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the > >>> charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be > >>> discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor > >>> shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who > >>> perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business > >>> practices require that management be forthright with employees and > >>> customers without coercion." > >>> This is socialism in any of its many forms. > >>> Take 'discriminatory' -- which necessarily occurs whenever more than one > >>> person seeks an available position ... > >>> What about the discrimination against the Business Owner that occurs when > >>> people choose NOT to work for him?And... "Only laws, rules, regulations > >>> and procedures that are in the > >>> best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed, > >>> enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed > >>> to prosper." > >>> MORE Socialism in any of its many forms. > >>> Regard$, > >>> --MJ"Daily experience proves clearly to everybody but the most bigoted > >>> fanatics of socialism that governmental management is inefficient and > >>> wasteful" -- Ludwig von Mises in "Economic Freedom and Interventionism," > >>> 1990. > >> -- > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > > Freedom is always illegal! > > When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we > declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we > have any possibility of being free. > > "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological > refuge of unthinking patriotism?" > Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
